UBBV_QKVNCH's Guestbook

183	Date: 2001-08-03 01:27:08 Tommy Tran ( tommy@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: TORTURE OF KOK KSOR'S MOTHER On 7 May 2001 the Vietnamese government security forces arrested an eighty-year old woman named Ksor H'Ble in her hill tribe village in Vietnam. The authorities threatened to kill her and had her beaten. She was hospitalized for three days after suffering from broken ribs. This brutal incident occurred at the communal village Bon Broai, district of Ayun Pa, Gia Lai province in Vietnam's Central Highlands. Why was she arrested, interrogated and beaten? The reason is that her son is a human rights activist in the United States who acts for the Montagnard/Degar hill tribes. This elderly woman however, hasn't seen her son "Kok Ksor" in over thirty years. Thus it is clear proof that Vietnam will use any inhumane practice to intimidate Montagnard people and persecute this race at any cost with no regard for human rights. This brutality has now become a standard practice by Vietnamese authorities as they continue threatening overseas Montagnards by targeting their relatives in Vietnam. ATTEMPTED POISONING OF REFUGEES BY VIETNAMESE SECURITY FORCES On June 7 2001 at 1:30 AM, the Vietnamese security forces entered the refugee's camp on motorbikes in Rattanakiri province of Cambodia. Here Montagnard refugees were seeking refuge from the martial law and severe repression inside Vietnam. The security forces throw tear-gas at them and poisoned the drinking water well of the Montagnard/Degar refugees there. In the morning, the refugees saw the water changed color. To make sure the water is safe for drinking, they made chicken drink the water and died immediately after. Now, the UNHCR has to get water from other sources to let the refugees use. This incident proves that how much more harm the Vietnamese government will do to the Montagnard refugees who want to return to Vietnam voluntarily. GENOCIDE OF THE MONTAGNARD (DEGAR PEOPLE) These are just some of the examples of the current communist government's genocidal policies toward this race of hill tribe people. In February 2001 the International Commission of Jurists distributed a report concluded that the Vietnamese government has committed gross human rights abuses against this race of people since 1975. The use of bounties in order to capture these fleeing refugees by Vietnam has already been condemned by Refugees International, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. Hundreds of Montagnards have been beaten, tortured and many have simply disappeared after being arrested. Now it seems even more cleared that Vietnam is intent on persecuting one of Asia's oldest races of people with no mercy. The Vietnamese government seems completely at ease in committing such human rights violations while also seeking trade benefits and aid money from Western nations and especially the United States of America. The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom and the European Commission have recently denounced the persecution in Vietnam. How long will Vietnam be allowed to continue in this manner? Will Vietnam be allowed to finish off the Montagnard/Degar race? Will their land confiscation schemes and sterilization policies be stopped? Will the world turn a blind eye to the plight of the indigenous Montagnard or Degar people? The Degar people in Vietnam are like babies in their mother's womb. They need people from outside to help their mothers to make right decision "to let die or to let live". So please help. Thank you.
182	Date: 2001-08-03 00:29:54 Tommy Tran ( tommy@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Hey! what the hell is going on here. I did not write these long biased-news on your guestbook but these idiots claimed that I did. You people are a bunch of desperate traitors who, unable to gain support from the Vietnamese community, resort to lies and deception in an attempt to portray these comments as true feelings of visiters to this site. By slandering the Vietnamese people and the Vietnamese people, you are NOT Vietnamese. No Vietnamese would defame his people and his homeland before the whole world. On behalf of all Vietnamese patriots, I have this to say to you: FUCK YOU TRAITORS !!!!! True Vietnamese patriots have nothing but contempt for you scums of the earth !!!!
181	Date: 2001-08-03 00:10:39 Steven Nguyen ( steven2000@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: I did not write these long articles such as the one titled "Reuters Wednesday, June 27 2001", yet your site attributed to yours truly. Either you (the owner or owners of this page) is spreading anti-Vietnamese propaganda disguising as legitimate public opinion. I hope that the viewers of this site is intelligent enough to distinguish this obvious lie. If the viewers of this site cannot trust you with the authenticity of the authors of published comments, then how can we possibly trust you with anything that you claim to represent. You ought to be ashame of yourselves !!!!!
180	Date: 2001-08-02 22:13:10 Tommy Tran ( tommy@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Reuters Tuesday, June 26 2001 Vietnam says to check Spratlys buildup reports HANOI, June 26 (Reuters) - Vietnam said on Tuesday it was paying great attention to and would check reports of stepped up Chinese naval activity around the disputed Spratly Islands. Monday's Washington Times newspaper quoted U.S. intelligence officials as saying China had deployed more than a dozen warships, including destroyers, around the Spratly Islands over the past weeks. Asked to comment, Vietnam's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Phan Thuy Thanh said in statement: "We are paying great attention to this and will check the information." On Tuesday China flatly denied it was stepping up naval activity around the islands. The Spratlys are a cluster of potentially oil-rich isles, reefs and shoals in the South China Sea claimed wholly or in part by China, Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei. Philippine officials said on Tuesday they were investigating the reported naval buildup.
179	Date: 2001-08-02 22:09:34 Tommy Tran ( tommy@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: South China Morning Post June 08 2001 Religious purge alienates allies Hanoi's continuing antipathy towards religious freedom is straining relations with a number of friendly nations that are becoming increasingly frustrated at its intolerance, foreign diplomats warned yesterday. Vietnam's Foreign Ministry declined to comment on the issue, but several embassies in Hanoi expressed concern at Wednesday's arrest and deportation of a member of the European Parliament after he made public his support for detained Buddhist monk Thich Quang Do. According to a statement released last night, Olivier Dupuis - a Belgian citizen and secretary of the little-known Transnational Radical Party - was held by security forces and deported after staging a demonstration outside Do's Thanh Minh Zen Monastery, in Ho Chi Minh City. "After being detained for several hours, he was expelled by the Vietnamese authorities and deported to Bangkok," the statement from the party's office in Brussels read. "[But] the Transnational Radical Party will continue its fight for religious freedom and democracy in Vietnam with the venerable Thich Quang Do and hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese people all over the world." Vietnam's Foreign Ministry spokesman Le Sy Vuong Ha said Mr Dupuis and his German assistant, Martin Schulthes, had carried out activities incompatible with their tourist visas. They were asked by immigration officials to sign a record and leave Vietnam on Wednesday, Mr Ha said, adding that Vietnam's action was in line with the country's law. "They acted in such a manner as to cause disorder in Ho Chi Minh City," he said. "They were asked to leave Vietnam before their visas expired." A Hanoi-based European diplomat said Mr Dupuis arrived in Vietnam this week as a tourist, but his expulsion had happened so quickly that diplomatic intervention had been impossible. "Over the last few years, the attitude has been that the tolerance of dissidence in Vietnam was improving. But events of the past few months show Vietnam is still ruled by a highly repressive regime and our position on that is hardening," he said. Those events include a diplomatic row over the fate of ethnic minorities who were granted refugee status in Cambodia after fleeing alleged persecution in Vietnam's Central Highlands; the arrest of Catholic priest Nguyen Van Ly; and the harassment and detention of Do and other devotees of the outlawed Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam. Do is deputy head of the church and has spent two decades in detention since 1975 for his outspoken demands for religious autonomy.
178	Date: 2001-08-02 22:05:20 Steven Nguyen ( steven2000@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Reuters Wednesday, June 27 2001 Vietnam assembly names reputed reformist new head HANOI, June 27 (Reuters) - Vietnam's National Assembly on Wednesday named a reputed reformist Nguyen Van An as its chairman in place of Nong Duc Manh, who resigned the post to concentrate on his new role as the chief of the ruling Communist Party. An gained 60 percent of votes at a session of the legislative body on Wednesday morning, a source at the session told Reuters. He took over as chairman with immediate effect and was due to hold a news conference at 4 p.m. (0900 GMT). The assembly session also voted to approve government proposals for new appointments to the ministerial-rank posts in charge of culture and sports. Earlier this month, the elite Politburo of the ruling Communist Party proposed An for the assembly post after Manh announced his resignation from the chair to concentrate on the party chief's job he was named to in April. An was born in October 1937 in the northern province of Nam Ha, now Nam Dinh province, and elevated to the Politburo in 1996. In his previous role as head of party's Organisation Commission, he had been considered a contender for the party chief's job himself in the run-up to the April congress. Aged 63 by the Western counting method or 64 by the Vietnamese, he is considered to belong to the reformist rather than conservative camp and has made tough statements in the past against rampant corruption. As such, his appointment should be welcomed by the business community, which hopes to see the new leadership push ahead with implementation of wide-ranging economic reforms and begin to revamp the administration and legal system. But diplomats say it remains to be seen whether An, who has a relatively spare public profile, will demonstrate both a commitment to reform and the administrative skills needed to push it through. While some Vietnamese political observers consider An to be a supporter of reform, they question if he will prove as effective as Manh in chairing an increasingly feisty assembly. Under Manh's nine-year stewardship, the National Assembly has been transformed from a toothless rubber-stamp body to an increasingly open forum for debate, with key sessions carried on live television. The official Voice of Vietnam radio said the assembly had also approved proposals to appoint Pham Quang Nghi as the new Culture and Information Minister and Nguyen Danh Thai as the ministerial-ranked chairman of the national sports committee. The source said Nghi won 76 percent backing and Thai 78 percent. Thai's predecessor, Ha Quang Du, was relieved of his position in May after being accused of mismanagement, amid a controversy over plans for a new national sports stadium. Former Information and Culture Minister Nguyen Khoa Diem was promoted to the Politburo in April and to head the party's Ideological and Cultural Department.
177	Date: 2001-08-02 21:58:41 Steven Nguyen ( steven2000@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Troubled Vietnam provinces get Uncle Ho portraits HANOI (Reuters) - Communist authorities in Vietnam have granted funds to step up propaganda work in central coffee growing provinces hit by ethnic unrest last month. Tuesday's official Saigon Giai Phong (Liberation Saigon) newspaper said the effort would include handing out portraits of late revolutionary hero Ho Chi Minh in the four central highlands provinces of Daklak, Gia Lai, Kontum and Lam Dong. It said three provinces -- Daklak, Gia Lai and Kontum -- would each be granted 100 million dong ($6,870) for propaganda work and 16 districts "in focus" would each receive 50 million dong ($3,437) to buy equipment. The four provinces would each receive a car for propaganda work and help in printing and editing pamphlets warning against "reactionary theories" and stressing the need for national unity, religious unity and the leading role of the Communist Party, the paper said. The Ministry of Culture would also provide educational programmes for local officials and documentary films, it said. Thousands of ethnic farmers staged anti-government protests in Gia Lai and Daklak in early February, the biggest known for years in communist Vietnam. Residents blamed the unrest on encroachment onto tribal lands by Vietnamese migrants and religious rights issues. Last week, a senior U.S. official in Hanoi said human rights, including suppression of the protests in the highlands, could make ratification of a key bilateral trade pact signed by Washington and Hanoi last year more difficult than expected. The issue has aroused particular interest in the United States as the tribespeople in the central highlands fought alongside U.S. forces during the Vietnam War and many later settled in America. Prospects for early ratification of the trade pact took a further knock at the weekend when authorities announced the detention of a Catholic priest, Father Nguyen Van Ly, after he urged the U.S. Congress not to ratify the trade agreement because of rights abuses.
176	Date: 2001-08-02 21:50:42 Steven Nguyen ( steven2000@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: In the House of Representatives Ms. Sanchez (for herself, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, and Mr. Davis of Virginia) submitted the following concurrent resolution: CONCURRENT RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of Congress that Dr. Doan Viet Hoat is to be praised and honored for his commitment to fight for democratic change in Vietnam. Whereas Doan Viet Hoat spent his life fighting for democratic change in Vietnam and has spent 19 of the last 21 years in Vietnamese prisons for his efforts to bring democracy to his homeland; Whereas Doan Viet Hoat, an educator, received a doctorate in Education and College Administration from Florida State University in 1971 and was Assistant to the Chancellor of Van Hanh University in Saigon from 1971to 1975; Whereas Doan Viet Hoat was denounced for his relationship with the United States and sentenced in 1976 to 12 years in Chi Hoa Prison without a trial, where he continued to write essays calling for democracy, human rights, and free elections in Vietnam; Whereas after his release from prison, Doan Viet Hoat founded the Dien Dan Tu Do (Freedom Forum) newsletter and continued to publish prodemocracy articles; Whereas in 1990, the Vietnamese authorities sentenced him to a 20-year prison sentence for attempting to overthrow the government by establishing a political organization and using the publication as an instrument to mobilize the public; Whereas Doan Viet Hoat received the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Award and the Golden Pen of Freedom Award of the World Association of Newspapers for his contributions to the cause of freedom; Whereas for nearly 20 years as a political prisoner, Doan Viet Hoat has been an example of great moral strength and courage for other political prisoners, refusing offers of freedom in exchange for a renunciation of his personal and politicla beliefs; Whereas Doan Viet Hoat was released on August 29, 1998, from prison in Vietnam, and was admitted to the United States as a refugee after considerable force was exerted upon the Vietnamese Government to release prisoners of conscience; Whereas Doan Viet Hoat called for the abolishment of the directive on "administrative detainment" which allows security forces to detain dissidents for up to 2 years without trial; and Whereas Dr. Doan Viet Hoat has dedicated his entire life to the cause of freedom and democracy for his fellow Vietnamese, at the price of his own freedom: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that Doan Viet Hoat is to be praised and honored for his contributions to the cause of democracy in Vietnam. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
175	Date: 2001-08-02 03:56:33 Steven Nguyen ( steven2000@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Imminent Confiscation of Thanh Quang Parish's Church and Land: Another Potential Confrontation over Religious Freedom (Vietnam) In mid-June 2001, the communist authorities of Quang Nam-Da Nang province sent a letter to Father Nguyen Huu Long, Pastor of Thanh Quang Parish, ordering him to surrender the church and the adjacent 2 hectares of land to the government for a museum project. The Thanh Quang Church, considered by many a sacred site like the La Vang Church in Quang Tri province, is located in the Tra Kieu area of the Duy Xuyen District, 30 km south of Da Nang City. The deadline set by the Government for the surrender of ownership was June 25, 2001. Months before this letter, the authorities had summoned Pastor Nguyen Huu Long and Archbishop Nguyen Binh Tinh of the Da Nang Archdiocese repeatedly to their office in an effort to force the transfer of ownership. The two Reverends steadfastly refused to comply. On the day of the deadline June 25, 2001, four priests in the surrounding parishes, Fr. Long, Fr. Hoa, Fr. Minh, and Fr. Khanh jointly said Mass before thousands of parishioners of Thanh Quang. Facing such a crowd, the Government's Public Security agents decided to not to take actions. They, however, took pictures and video-tapes the participants as measures of intimidation. On June 29, 2001, the Public Security again summoned Father Nguyen Huu Long to their office and demand an immidiate surrender of the properties. Father Long said he had not the authorities to do so and the decision rested with the parishioners and the Bishops Council of Vietnam. He also handed the Government a letter, signed by over 200 representatives of the parishioners, refusing to relinquish their church. The phone line to the Thanh Quang Church has been disconnected by the Government. From past experiences, disconnection of all means of communication signals an imminent attack by the Government force.
174	Date: 2001-08-02 03:54:27 Steven Nguyen ( steven2000@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: What Century Are We Living In ? By Tom Plate LOS ANGELES - It�s understandable. Now 85, Robert McNamara, in his new book "Wilson�s Ghost," is urging that America get involved in foreign crises only under the umbrella of multinational efforts. And you would take that view, too, if you had been the boss of the U.S. Defense Department under John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson and had led a bullheaded America into its Vietnam nightmare. But that philosophy � combined with China�s avowed policy of noninterference in other states� internal affairs and Europe�s predictable greediness to cultivate the 79-million-strong Vietnamese market � means that the Montagnards, one of Southeast Asia�s venerable highland tribes, will probably be extinguished from the face of the Earth. The Socialist Republic of Vietnam, it appears, is back to its old cruel and dirty tricks. While trying to burnish its image so as to entice foreign investment and trade, it has been hunting down and killing off this small ethnic minority of largely harmless agriculturists but also fierce warriors who sided with America during the Vietnam War. Says international refugee expert Lionel Rosenblatt, who recently returned from a fact-finding trip to Cambodia, where refugees try to flee: "The Vietnamese really think that the best kind of Montagnard is a dead one." Hanoi, it seems, is terrified of these legendary mountain people. Many are Christians, in a largely Buddhist land, and Vietnam is insecure in the face of any organized opposition. When the Montagnards do manage to escape police roundups into Cambodia, the Vietnamese cross that border and hunt them down � sometimes with the help of Cambodians, in tragic fact � to either slaughter them there or bring them back for severe and sometimes capital punishment. Not surprisingly, few if any outsiders are permitted into Vietnam�s Central Highlands these days. "Just when you thought the Vietnamese Communists were mellowing," comments a former high State Department official, "here you have the nasty side of the Vietnamese." That Montagnard persecution manifestly violates international accords unsettles neither Hanoi nor Phnom Penh, where pro-Hanoi Cambodian Prime Minister Hen Sen, save when prodded by international organizations or the United States, looks the other way. The Bush administration�s State Department has protested the Montagnard persecution, as has the office of Sen. Jesse Helms, R-N.C., who, however otherwise bombastic, is right on this anti-communist issue. And nonpartisan human rights groups, notably the Washington-based advocacy organization Refugees International, are doing heroic work in an effort to stem the mini-genocide. This current Hanoi government is the hardest to figure in all of Asia � or at least among the few remaining Communist regimes. North Korea, after all, is easy: Pyongyang and its economic system are a complete failure � end of story. Beijing isn�t hard to scope out, either � it�s simply a lumbering conglomerate of 1.3 billion people trying to feed, placate or intimidate its gargantuan population while quietly upgrading its antiquated system into one that�s more compatible with entrepreneurial capitalism. But Vietnam � now here�s a massive contradiction! On one level, change is in the air. Entrepreneurship is flourishing, the people are increasingly capitalistic, and outside investment is returning, along with Vietnamese expats from America, homesick for their beautiful country and deep culture. But then there�s that awful government: an old-fashioned Stalinist Communist one, dominated by men long past their intellectual prime. This past year Hanoi had its hands full suppressing large-scale anti-Hanoi riots. To be sure, America really doesn�t know what to do with the contradictions of Vietnam. Under President Clinton, we sought to bury the hatchet of the quarter-century-old Vietnam War by opening up trade and easing economic sanctions with a county that has a population larger than either Great Britain or France. Perhaps moving away from economic engagement in response to this emerging humanitarian tragedy will not much interest America�s European allies, entranced by visions of riches. But if McNamara is right in saying that unilateral moves by the United States are a mistake, who or what, then, will save the Montagnards? For unless Washington does something � retightens sanctions, protests even more loudly, beseeches European and Asian allies, including China, to do the same � the Montagnards will certainly die, one by one, until they are no more. What century are we living in? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FVA Home Page
173	Date: 2001-08-02 03:45:41 Tommy Tran ( tommy@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Arrested Vietnamese Priest Interrogated Daily VATICAN CITY, JULY 23, 2001 (Zenit.org) .- A Vietnamese priest arrested in May for his outspoken support of religious freedom in his country is being subjected to multiple interrogations every day, a U.S.-based commission says. Father Thaddeus Nguyen Van Ly, 54, is giving frank answers to captors at an unidentified location, said a report published by the Washington, D.C.-based Commission for Religious Liberty in Vietnam. The report cited sources in the Southeast Asian nation. In February Father Van Ly urged the U.S. government not to ratify a trade agreement with Vietnam because of its grave human-rights violations. In May, following his arrest by police who stormed a parish church, Hanoi rejected a plea by U.S. President George W. Bush for the priest's release. According to the July 16 issue of the Churches of Asia magazine, two priests of Hue, an area close to Father Van Ly, have reiterated their support for the detained priest. In an open letter dated June 24, Fathers Pierre Nguyen Huu Giai and Nguyen Van Loi say they have been "assigned to a residence and are closely watched," and express their solidarity with leaders and followers of Unified Buddhism and the original Hoa Hoa Buddhism (Thuan Tuy), currently being persecuted by the police. The two priests requested the Communist authorities to abandon their hostile policy on religious liberty and release Father Van Ly. On July 14, a month after a Vatican delegation to Vietnam pressed the Holy See's requests for new bishops there, John Paul II filled some vacancies. Bishops were selected for Bui Chu, which has been without a bishop for some time; for Phan Thiet, w! hose bishop is elderly; and for Ho Chi Minh City, formerly called Saigon. Father Joseph Hoang Van Tiem, a professor of moral theology at the Hanoi major seminary, was appointed bishop of Bui Chu. Father Paul Nguyen Thanh Hoan, from Ham Tan, was appointed coadjutor bishop of Phan Thiet. Father Joseph Vu Duy Thong, a professor at the major seminary in the Ho Chi Minh-Ville Archdiocese, was appointed auxiliary bishop. The appointments had been expected after Vatican officials in June reported some headway, with some of the Church's choices winning government approval but others being rejected. Among the Vatican choices reportedly rejected for the bishop's posts was one to replace an 82-year-old bishop in Hanoi, another for a diocese in the northeast which has been without a bishop since 1992 and another for a diocese lacking a bishop for three years, the Associated Press reported. Vietnam's 76 million people are predominantly Buddhist. The nation has 8 million Catholics. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
172	Date: 2001-08-02 03:41:25 Tommy Tran ( tommy@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Vietnam tops the list of corruption in Asia Reuters Hong Kong, March 19 CORRUPTION REMAINS a serious problem in most countries in Asia and few have paid heed to the lessons from Asia's 1997/1998 financial crisis, a recent study by the Political & Economic Risk Consultancy Ltd (PERC) showed. Corruption in some parts of the region was even growing worse, said the Hong Kong-based consultancy, which polled views from expatriates working in Asia in the first quarter of 2001. Of the 12 countries surveyed in Asia, Singapore was deemed least corrupt with a score of 0.83, Japan was second at 2.50 and Hong Kong third at 3.77. Zero was the best grade possible and 10 the worst. The rest of Asia scored over five, which showed that little cleaning up had been done despite the role that corruption played in the Asian financial crisis, PERC said. Vietnam, with a score of 9.75, was the most corrupt country in the region, according to those polled, followed by Indonesia. But PERC said it disagreed with that view, adding that Indonesia's situation was possibly the worst in Asia. "Vietnam's political system and structure as a country is not imminently threatened by corruption. Indonesia's is," it said. Indonesia, with a score of 9.5, fell into a category where "foreign investors and local companies often encounter corruption but governments are unwilling to admit that graft is a big problem," PERC said. India, whose coalition government is facing a raging arms bribery scandal, was listed as the third most corrupt nation in the region, followed by the Philippines, Thailand, China and South Korea. Taiwan and Malaysia tied for the eighth most corrupt places, the survey said. The Philippines and Thailand were listed among countries where corruption was serious and "no one seems to be in a big hurry to change the system and people, especially political leaders (who) seem to shrug off the problem as being just the way things are," it said. The PERC said corruption in both countries was getting worse. Though graft was still rampant in China, conditions seemed to be slowly improving, the survey showed. But it added that despite government recognition of the issue, "corruption runs so deep and is so intertwined with life at virtually all levels of the country that it is very difficult for any leader to make a lasting dent in the problem." Despite Hong Kong's healthy score, PERC said its biggest threat could come from external corruption, such as from Chinese companies. The consultancy recalled the collapse of the state-backed Guangdong Enterprises two years ago which delivered a huge blow to banks in the former British territory which returned to Chinese rule in mid-1997. It said: "Think what would happen if one or more of the major Chinese state-owned companies that are now raising tens of billions of dollars in the international capital market (often through a Hong Kong initial public offering) were to collapse through mismanagement and corruption." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
171	Date: 2001-08-02 03:38:42 Steven Nguyen ( steven2000@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM STRUGGLE IN VIETNAM FROM AUSTRALIA ... Statement of Reba Meagher Member for Cabramatta - NSW Australia 21.6.2001 New South Wales Parliament House Mr Speaker, I rise today to speak on an issue of great importance to the community I represent - and also an issue of fundamental relevance to this house. Whatever the differences between us in this parliament we all share the belief that every person should be free. Free to think what they like, free to speak their minds without fear and free to worship as their hearts dictate. We all hold these values as inalienable human rights. Governments- all governments should seek to preserve and extend them, and in places where they are denied - it is our responsibility as men and women of conscience - not to sit idly, but to act. Our role as a Member of this Parliament is very broad and every day we are confronted by issues of immediate and passionate concern to the people we represent that go beyond the national boundaries of our jurisdiction. Mr Speaker, as community representatives we are elected to do more than fine tune the levers of taxation and spending - we must also articulate the fears and support and support the aspirations of our constituents. As the Member for Cabramatta I represent the largest single community of Vietnamese Australians in the country. And as their representative in the State Parliament I speak for them on a range of issues like law and order, health, education and training- issues that are the traditional domain of a state legislature. However, the concern that unites Vietnamese Australians is that of Human Rights in their homeland. And they have asked for our support. Many of the people I represent were victims of torture and trauma - political refugees who were forced to flee a repressive and intolerant regime. They have faced things we can only conceive of in nightmares. I personally know many men and women, children who have faced the heartbreaking choice of leaving their family or losing their life. Mr Speaker, these Vietnamese Australians that I refer to - are good Australian citizens. They participate peacefully and enthusiastically in our democratic process. Many belong to volunteer community organisations that assist the elderly, the young or those that need help with the resettlement process. And while they have contributed immeasurably to Australia�s rich cultural heritage and helped build our reputation as a harmonious multicultural nation, many continue to campaign for the peaceful transition to democracy in Vietnam. Mr Speaker, their concern are fully justified. There has been a disturbing escalation of human rights breaches in recent times, particularly in the wake of the arrest of Father Van Ly by internal security forces on 17 May this year. Father Ly�s social, humanitarian and educational work in Vietnam has won the support of many of the Vietnamese people and also the respect of the international community. His arrest, coupled with the continued detention of the Venerable Thich Huyen Quang of the Unified Buddhist movement has led to an international outcry for their release and greater tolerance from the Vietnamese Government toward religious freedoms. Mr Speaker, on Sunday June 3 this year, I addressed a rally organised by Vietnamese Community in Australia protesting the growing religious oppression in Vietnam. The rally was also addressed by leaders of the Unified Vietnamese Buddhist Congregation, the Vietnamese Catholic Community, the Cao Dai Congregation and the Hoa Hao Congregation. It was a rally made significant by the fact that it was the first time in Australia that all of the Vietnamese religious leaders had come together, united in their protest. These too are men and women of conscience and their appeals to us on behalf of former countrymen can not be allowed to fall on deaf ears. Mr Speaker, I am sure that I speak for the vast majority of Honourable Members when I say that perhaps we take our freedom for granted. That is because we know that they are sacred and inviolate and protected by the full weight of the law and will of the people. But as the experience in Vietnam so clearly shows, there are people who are prepared to suffer great hardship, deprivation and cruelty to gain these same freedoms. Mr Speaker, we must support that struggle. It is because of men and women like them in OUR history that we have our liberty and the freedom to fully express our individuality. Mr Speaker, my electorate of Cabramatta is a shining example of how people from all walks of life, from nations all across the globe can live and work together in acceptance and harmony. This comes from the respect we have for each other as individuals and an acceptance, even joy, that comes from our differences. Let us do what we can do to foster these very Australian qualities in other nations. Mr Speaker, the NSW Parliament is the oldest democratic institution in the country and for that reason I consider it entirely appropriate that we extend such a profound statement of support to Vietnamese Australians. I commend the motion to the House. MOTION Commended by Reba Meagher MP for Cabramatta, and moved by the NSW Parliament on 21/6/01 That this House shares the concerns of the Australian Vietnamese Community in NSW over alleged abuses of Human Rights inVietnam. Further this House: a) Supports the Australian Vietnamese Community�s concerns about the Vietnamese Government�s continued detention, house arrest and harassment of political dissidents and religious leaders; b) Supports the Australian Vietnamese Community�s concerns with respect to the restriction of freedom of speech, the press, assembly and association in Vietnam. c) Supports the Australian Vietnamese Community�s call on the Australian Government to take concrete steps to monitor the human rights situation in Vietnam, including requesting the Vietnamese Government to allow Australian diplomats to visit those alleged to be prisoners of conscience and to do so on a regular basis; d) Supports the Australian Vietnamese Community�s call on the Australian Government to make regular representations to relevant Vietnamese Ministers and officials in Vietnam and the Vietnamese Embassy in Canberra for the immediate release of all prisoners of conscience and for accelerated progress in moves to wind back restrictions on democratic freedoms; e) Supports the Australian Vietnamese Community�s call on the Australian Government to provide the Parliament with regular reporting on its human rights representations to the Government of Vietnam on the responses by Vietnam and the overall human rights situation in Vietnam. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FROM EUROPE ... EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Session document 4 July 2001 RESOLUTION on religious freedom in Vietnam European Parliament resolution on religious freedom in Vietnam The European Parliament, � having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Vietnam of 19 January 1995, 15 May 1997, 16 March 1998 and 16 November 2000, A. whereas Vietnam as a state party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) has to uphold freedom of religious belief and worship as enshrined in its Article 18, B. whereas Article 70 of Vietnam�s constitution guarantees freedom of faith and religion, C. concerned at the further increase in tension between the government and the religious communities in Vietnam as well as the many instances of persecution of religious leaders, following the ninth Congress of the Vietnamese Communist Party from 19 to 22 April 2001, D. concerned at the criticism expressed in March 1999 on religious persecution in Vietnam by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Religious Intolerance, Mr Abdelfattah Amor, E. having regard to the persecution of leaders of the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam, including its Patriarch, the Very Venerable Thich Huyen Quang, detained without charge or trial for 20 years, set free in 1997, but still not allowed to leave his place of detention, and the Venerable Thich Quang Do, amnestied in 1998 after 20 years of detention, but again put under a two-year sentence of administrative detention after he tried to arrange for medical attention for the ailing Patriarch, F. having regard to the persecution suffered by Catholics, in particular the imprisonment of Father Nguyen Van Ly on 17 May for having practised his religion following a ban issued by the Vietnamese authorities, G. having regard to the persecution of all followers of so-called non-recognised churches, notably the Cao Dai Church, the Hoa Hao Church and Protestant Churches, H. having regard to the violent State repression in February 2001 of a massive protest by ethnic minorities of the high plains of central Vietnam, who were protesting against the confiscation of their ancestral lands, religious persecution and the ban on their conversion to Protestantism, I. whereas respect for human rights and democratic principles is an essential element in the 1995 cooperation agreement between the European Union and Vietnam, 1. Calls on the Government of Vietnam to implement the recommendations of the UN Special Rapporteur on Religious Intolerance, Abdelfattah Amor, and in particular to guarantee the right of all people in Vietnam to practise the religion of their choice, including the right to freedom of worship and the right of assembly; 2. Calls for the release of all prisoners of conscience, especially the Very Venerable Thich Huyen Quang, the Venerable Thich Quang Do and Father Nguyen Van Ly, and for them to be granted freedom of movement; 3. Calls on the Vietnamese authorities to respect the religious freedoms of Buddhists, Catholics, Protestants as well as all other so-called non-recognised churches and to stop all anti-religious campaigns throughout the country; 4. Calls on the Vietnamese Government to ensure the "safe, dignified and voluntary" return of those who fled from the high plains of central Vietnam to Cambodia, as agreed with the UNHCR, while guaranteeing freedom of faith and worship; 5. Calls on the ambassadors to Vietnam of the Member States and the European Union to follow developments in this connection with the closest attention and to report to it in the framework of relations between the Council, Commission and Parliament; 6. Asks its Delegation for relations with the Member States of Asean, South-East Asia and the Republic of Korea to plan a visit to Vietnam to meet religious leaders of all confessions, especially those who have been imprisoned; 7. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the representatives of the Vietnamese Unified Buddhist Church, the Cao Dai Church, the Hoa Hao Church, the Catholic Church and the Protestant Churches. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FROM THE US ... Vietnam Human Rights Act Introduced to US House of Representatives 03 July 2001 A bipartisan group of lawmakers submitted a bill June 28 that would seek to promote "freedom and democracy" in communist-ruled Vietnam. Representative Christopher Smith (Republican of New Jersey) introduced H.R. 2368, which would set up a Congressional-Executive Commission on Vietnam that would oversee how well the Hanoi regime lives up to internationally recognized human rights standards. The Commission "shall monitor the acts of the Government of Viet Nam which reflect compliance with or violation of human rights, in particular, those contained in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights," H.R. 2368 says. In language similar to the legislation that granted China Permanent Normal Trade Relations status, H.R. 2368 would establish a commission with members chosen by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President of the Senate, and the President of the United States to monitor conditions in Vietnam. Among the rights the Commission would follow are: the right to engage in free expression; the right to peaceful assembly; religious freedom, including the right to worship and to participate in religious activities and institutions free of involvement of and interference by the government; the right to liberty of movement, the freedom to choose a residence within Vietnam and the right to leave from and return to Vietnam; and the rights of a defendant in a criminal case to basic legal protections common in Western democracies. The proposed Commission would also monitor Vietnam�s progress in establishing a civil society based on the rule of law. In its findings, the proposed legislation says Vietnam is a one-party state, ruled and controlled by the Vietnamese Communist Party. H.R. 2368 also states that the Hanoi regime "denies the people of Viet Nam the right to change their government and prohibits independent political, social, and labor organizations." That nation�s government, it adds, "consistently pursues a policy of harassment, discrimination, and intimidation, and sometimes of imprisonment and other forms of detention, against those who peacefully express dissent from government or party policy." H.R. 2368 was co-sponsored by Representatives Frank Wolf (Republican of Virginia), the co-chairman of the Congressional Human Rights Caucus, Benjamin Gilman (Republican of New York), the chairman emeritus of the House International Relations Committee, Tom Davis (Republican of Virginia), Zoe Lofgren (Democrat of California), Dana Rohrabacher (Republican of California), Edward Royce (Republican of California, and Loretta Sanchez (Democrat of California). Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren Increases Pressure to Stop Vietnam Religious Persecution (Washington, DC) Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) has joined her colleagues Reps. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA) and Tom Davis (R-VA) in condemning the recent crack down on religious freedoms in Vietnam. Together, they wrote letters to Vietnamese Prime Minister Phan Van Khai, U.S. Ambassador Pete Peterson, and Secretary of State Colin Powell. The letters highlighted the persecution and harassment of religious leaders in Vietnam. In particular, they called attention to the cases of Father Nguyen Van Ly, Most Venerable Patriarch Thich Huyen Quang, and the Most Venerable Thich Quang Do. They also requested from Prime Minister Khai an update on the health and well being of these dissidents. Excerpts of the letter: "On May 16, 2001, the Congressional Human Rights Caucus and the Congressional Dialogue on Vietnam co-sponsored a hearing about religious freedom in Vietnam. Religious leaders from many different faiths testified about the continued violation of rights guaranteed to them under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights." "Father Nguyen Van Ly was arrested on May 17, 2001 and has been transferred to a military hospital near Hue, where his condition is uncertain. We understand that this is not the first time Father Ly has been punished by the authorities for the free practice of his religion. He has been under constant surveillance since 1977, when he was arrested for distributing two essays by Archbishop Nguyen Kim Dien that protested the lack of religious freedom in Vietnam." "The Most Venerable Thich Huyen Quang, Patriarch of the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam, has been under house arrest without trial since 1982. He is critically ill and in need of serious medical attention. When the Most Venerable Thich Quang Do attempted to escort him to Saigon for medical treatment, Venerable Do was formally placed under house arrest. Presently, the security police maintain a 24-hour cordon around the Venerable Do's pagoda. We respectfully request that you monitor these situations closely." "As we continue to move forward furthering relations between the United States and Vietnam, it is our hope that the United States will continue its scrutiny of Vietnam's human rights record and treatment of religious leaders. As you prepare to visit Vietnam in late July we urge you to remember these brave dissidents and the countless other Vietnamese who are prisoners of conscience." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
170	Date: 2001-08-01 22:30:17 Steven Nguyen ( steven2000@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: To all those Vietnamese who fought on the South and to those who support the Southern separatists, you guys are TRAITORS. Just like the Nazis collaborators in WWII, you are no better than those who sold their souls, their brothers and sisters, fathers and mothers and your country to the foreigners. Once a traitor, always a traitor. Once a cannibal always a cannibal. Don't get me wrong; I am not a communist. But thank God for the Vietnamese Communists who free the Vietnamese people from colonialism, slavery and bondage. It is the communists who stand tall and fought the French, the Japanese and the American to free their fellow Vietnamese from bondage. You, my friends, aided and abetted the enemies. You, my friends, sold your countries TWICE to the foreigners, are no longer Vietnamese. Without the Vietnamese communists, the Vietnamese people would still be under foreign domination and bondage. It is the Vietnamese communists who sacrificed their lives so that the Vietnamese people can be free men and free women. Therefore, with their contributions to the Vietnamese nation, I say: ********************************************* LONG LIVE THE VIETNAMESE COMMUNIST PARTY !!!! LONG LIVE PRESIDENT HO CHI MINH !!!!!!!!! *************************************** That is for you, my TRAITOROUS, friends.
169	Date: 2001-08-01 22:01:45 Tommy Tran ( tommy@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Just to remind your readers that the war was over more than 25 years ago and that the south lost. Take the American Civil War, for example. The south lost and that the country united under one flag and one national anthem. The south vietnamese regime lost because of many reasons. A few reasons obvious reasons are: 1. The southern army is not a professional army; it is made up of incompetent, untested and coward officers and generals. 2. Their cause was unjust. Let me explain. Since the dawn of vietnamese civilization (4000 years), Vietnam has always been one. The vietnamese people have always been one, united by their rich culture, language and customs. Yet the aim of the southern regime is to break up the country, dividing the people and weaken the nation. This is traitorous. 3. The southern regime relied completely on the American arm forces to fight the war for them. In short, without the actual American presence, the southern military is like a bunch of armed thugs. Ask any American officers or grunts who fought in the Vietnam war, they will tell you that the ARVN was probably is most incompetent and the most corrupt army in the world at that time. The American military furnished the southern regime with some of the most sophisticated military hardwares at that time, and yet, the moment they left, the ARVN fell apart. Let's face the facts. The southern regime lost the war because their army was controlled by a bunch of incompetent, idiots. The communists won the war!!!. Now that the communists have re-established a relationship with its one time enemy, the United States, you guys are still fighting the battle that you lost some 26 years ago. For the first time in more than 100 years, Vietnam is at peace with itself, yet you guys are still talk of war. Most American servicemen have made peace with themselves and with the war and you guys are still bitter of the past. As far as I am and the majority of the American servicemen are concerned, the war is history. We shall play the Star Sprangle along with the Tien Quan Ca (the united Vietnamese anthem); and let the Stars and Stripes and the Golden Star flags flutter side by side in the wind of change. It is simple. It has to do with making money stupid!. good day to you all.
168	Date: 2001-07-23 16:52:28 Anh Pham ( VtPassion129@yahoo.com / http://www.angelfire.com/va2/disguiseangelica/vietnamwar.html) wrote: My name is Anh, I'm was here a long time ago, now I'm back to visit again and sign your guest book. This page is really nice in a simple way. Maybe you should add more Vietnamese or American patriotic music and have a gallery with a lot of pictures. Xin chao`!
167	Date: 2001-07-17 20:14:06 Robert Carroll ( rcarroll@bellsouth.net / http://personal.mia.bellsouth.net/~rcarroll) wrote: I enjoyed your site and especially the music. Best wishes, Robert Carroll
166	Date: 2001-06-30 06:36:57 Nguoi an danh ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Toi dang tim cach thay cac la co cua cong san tren cac site cua cong san o trong nuoc bang la co Quoc Gia, co ai biet chi dum. Day cung la 1 y kien, co ai lam duoc xin nhiet tinh hoan ho. Nguoi an danh
165	Date: 2001-06-26 14:34:24 David Hope ( strope@surfeu.de / no homepage) wrote: I was delighted to hear your wonderful National Anthem. I was trained as a musician, but now I teach English, and I'm coming to work in Ho Chi Minh City next week. Because of my musical background, I'm always interested to hear national anthems, and I look forward to learning the words. At the moment it all seems very difficult! David Hope
164	Date: 2001-06-22 20:36:56 gaby ( gaby.didonna@wanadoo.fr / no homepage) wrote: i'ts a long time i want to find the national south vietnem!! and now i get thanks a lot my father will be happy!!!
163	Date: 2001-06-16 22:51:21 Vietnamese ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
162	Date: 2001-05-05 21:44:22 xin lo^~i ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Test Chữ việt sao kh� viết gh� l�m sao �ể mọi ng�ời c�ng �ọc Xử dụng unicode xem sao Kh�ng cần font việt nam cũng ��ợc
161	Date: 2001-04-09 04:47:01 TK C ( tk_chan@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: hi~ I am just a visitor, I have been visit this website for few times, it's very good website. also, I am studying the economic and politic of Vietnam. can u or anybody tell me what's the leader's name, title, party and political structure of Vietnam? or any websites that I can get the info from?
160	Date: 2001-04-07 18:07:50 Vietnamese ( no email / no homepage) wrote: THO^NG CA'O BA'O CHI' LA`M TA.I LHQ GENEVE NGA`Y 6.4.2001 36 Da^n bie^?u Hoa Ky` vie^'t thu+ cho U?y ho^.i Nha^n quye^`n LHQ ta.i Gene`ve ye^u ca^`u ho^~ tro+. "Lo+`i Ke^u go.i cho Da^n chu? Vie^.t Nam" cu?a Ho`a thu+o+.ng Thi'ch Qua?ng DDo^., ke`m theo 70 chu+~ ky' cu?a ca'c Da^n bie^?u Pha'p, A^u cha^u, nha^n si~, tri' thu+'c quo^'c te^' va` 308.027 chu+~ ky' cu?a ngu+o+`i Vie^.t ha?i ngoa.i U?y ban Ba?o ve^. Quye^`n Ngu+o+`i Vie^.t Nam dda~ mo+? cuo^.c va^.n ddo^.ng la^'y chu+~ ky' ha^.u thua^~n sa'ch lu+o+.c Ta'm ddie^?m trong "Lo+`i Ke^u go.i cho Da^n chu? Vie^.t Nam" cu?a Ho`a thu+o+.ng Thi'ch Qua?ng DDo^., Vie^.n tru+o+?ng Vie^.n Ho'a DDa.o, Gia'o ho^.i Pha^.t gia'oVie^.t Nam Tho^'ng nha^'t. Cuo^.c va^.n ddo^.ng na`y ddu+o+.c ddo^`ng ba`o ha?i ngoa.i nhie^.t lie^.t hu+o+?ng u+'ng nhu+ chu+a bao gio+` ddu+o+.c xa^?y ra. Mo.i gio+'i, mo.i ddoa`n the^?, ho^.i ddoa`n va` ca'c to^n gia'o cu`ng ca'c co+ quan truye^`n tho^ng, ba'o chi' Vie^.t ngu+~ dda~ tie^'p va^.n cuo^.c ho^~ tro+. na`y kha('p na(m cha^u. Chi? trong vo`ng 15 nga`y, qua thu+ ddie^.n tu+?, qua ma'y Fax, qua ddu+o+`ng bu+u ddie^.n ho?a to^'c, ngu+o+`i Vie^.t o+? Hoa Ky`, Canada, A^u cha^u, U'c dda.i lo+.i, Nha^.t ba?n dda~ gu+?i ve^` co+ so+? Que^ Me. o+? Paris 308.027 (Ba tra(m ta'm nghi`n hai mu+o+i ba?y) chu+~ ky' ha^.u thua^~n Lo+`i Ke^u go.i cho Da^n chu? Vie^.t Nam ! Ta^'t ca? dda~ ddu+o+.c cho+? dde^'n Gene`ve nha^n kho'a ho.p cu?a U?y ho^.i Nha^n quye^`n LHQ la^`n thu+' 57 dde^? go'p tie^'ng no'i vo+'i nhu+~ng nha^n si~, tri' thu+'c, da^n bie^?u, thu+o+.ng nghi. si~ quo^'c te^' ddo`i ho?i tu+. do, nha^n quye^`n va` khai mo+? tie^'n tri`nh da^n chu? Vie^.t Nam. Nhu+~ng nha^n si~, tri' thu+'c quo^'c te^' ky' te^n ha^.u thua^~n Lo+`i Ke^u go.i cu?a Ho`a thu+o+.ng Thi'ch Qua?ng DDo^. go^`m co' : Gia?i Nobel Ho`a bi`nh ba` Mairead Corrigan Maguire, Ngu.y Kinh Sinh (Nha` tranh dda^'u cho Da^n chu?, Trung quo^'c), Vladimir Boukovski (Nha` va(n, Nga), Leonid Plyush (Nha` Toa'n ho.c, Ukraine), Han Dong Fen (La~nh tu. Co^ng ddoa`n, Trung quo^'c), Andre Glucksmann (Trie^'t gia, Pha'p), Alain Touraine (Nha` xa~ ho^.i ho.c, Pha'p), Marie Holzman (Gia'o su+ DDa.i ho.c, Pha'p), Pierre Kende (Gia'o su+ DDa.i ho.c, Hung gia lo+.i), Alexander Podrabinek (Chu? nhie^.m ta.p chi' Chronicle, Nga), Aung Ko (Die^~n vie^n, Nha` tranh dda^'u Da^n chu?, Mie^'n DDie^.n), Lobsang Nyandak (Gia'm ddo^'c Trung ta^m Nha^n quye^`n va` Da^n chu?, Ta^y Ta.ng). Ca'c vi. Da^n bie^?u Quo^'c ho^.i Pha'p va` Lie^n hie^.p A^u cha^u : Emma Bonino, Marco Pannella, Marco Cappato, Marie-Arlette Carlotti, Gianfranco Dello~Alba, Benedetto Della Vedova, Jules Maaten, Olivier Dupuis, Maurizio Turco, Marie-Helene Aubert, Jean-Louis Bernard, Bernard Charles... cu`ng nhie^`u te^n tuo^?i kha'c dde^'n tu+` Hoa Ky`, Mexico, Uganda, Hong Kong, Indonesia... Ba` Loretta Sanchez, Da^n bie^?u Quo^'c ho^.i Hoa Ky`, vie^'t thu+ gu+?i ca'c Tha`nh vie^n LHQ thuo^.c U?y ho^.i Nha^n quye^`n ta.i kho'a ho.p la^`n thu+' 57 o+? Gene`ve ke`m theo chu+~ ky' ho^~ tro+. cu?a 35 Da^n bie^?u. Nguye^n va(n bu+'c thu+ a^'y nhu+ sau : "QUO^'C HO^.I HOA KY` Washington, nga`y 3.4.2001 "Ki'nh gu+?i quy' Tha`nh vie^n Lie^n Hie^.p Quo^'c ta.i Kho'a ho.p la^`n thu+' 57 cu?a U?y ho^.i Nha^n quye^`n DDie^.n Quo^'c lie^n Gene`ve (Thu.y si~) "Quy' vi. Tha`nh vie^n Lie^n Hie^.p Quo^'c ki'nh me^'n, "Mo^~i nga`y quy' vi. dde^`u cha(m lo pha't trie^?n ho`a bi`nh va` thi.nh vu+o+.ng cho toa`n the^? tra'i dda^'t. Nhu+~ng ddoa`n li'nh mu~ xanh ho`a bi`nh cu?a LHQ theo do~i va` nga(n cha^.n nhu+~ng hie^.n ti`nh co' nguy co+ ga^y tranh ca~i, trong khi nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i hoa.t ddo^.ng cu+'u te^' giu'p ddo+~ ca'c na.n nha^n ta.i no+i tranh cha^'p hay vu`ng da^n su+. ba^'t o^?n. "Tuy nhie^n, kho^ng pha?i cuo^.c chie^'n tranh na`o cu~ng xa^?y ra tre^n chie^'n tru+o+`ng. Mo^.t so^' cuo^.c chie^'n dda^'u die^~n ra tru+o+'c cu+?a nha`, no+i tru+o+`ng ho.c va` giu+~a ca'c trung ta^m thi. tra^'n, khi' gio+'i ddu+o+.c su+? du.ng kho^ng la` su'ng va` dda.n, ma` ba(`ng lo+`i no'i va` y' kie^'n. Cuo^.c chie^'n dda^'u nhu+ the^' ddang tie^'p die^~n ta.i Vie^.t Nam, no+i nha^n da^n ddem chi'nh tu+. do va` thi.nh vu+o+.ng kinh te^' cu?a ho. dde^? dda'nh ddo^?i, va` ddo^i khi, ddem chi'nh sinh me^.nh ho. ta.o co+ may cho vie^.c thie^'t la^.p mo^.t xa~ ho^.i da^n chu?. "Cuo^.c tranh dda^'u cho mu.c tie^u da^n chu? ta.i Vie^.t Nam ddang pha't trie^?n ro^.ng kha('p, va` mo^.t trong nhu+~ng tie^'ng no'i dde^` xu+o+'ng su+. thay ddo^?i a^'y la` Ho`a thu+o+.ng Thi'ch Qua?ng DDo^.. Vi. la~nh dda.o cu?a Gia'o ho^.i bi. ca^'m ddoa'n la` Gia'o ho^.i Pha^.t gia'o Vie^.t Nam Tho^'ng nha^'t, Ho`a thu+o+.ng Thi'ch Qua?ng DDo^. dda~ bi. tu` dda`y, qua?n thu'c, ro^`i la.i bi. ca^`m tu` vi` dda~ no'i le^n tie^'ng no'i ca(n ba?n cu?a nha^n quye^`n. "The^' nhu+ng, ca'c ha`nh ddo^.ng (dda`n a'p) na`y cha(?ng la`m tho^'i chuye^?n y' chi' ddem la.i da^n chu? va` tu+. do cho que^ hu+o+ng Vie^.t Nam cu?a Ho`a thu+o+.ng. Ga^`n dda^y, Ho`a thu+o+.ng Thi'ch Qua?ng DDo^. co^ng bo^' "Lo+`i Ke^u go.i cho Da^n chu? Vie^.t Nam", mo^.t sa'ch lu+o+.c Ta'm ddie^?m nhu+ ke^' hoa.ch chuye^?n ho'a la`m thay ddo^?i va` ddem la.i da^n chu? ta.i Vie^.t Nam. Lo+`i Ke^u go.i la` mo^.t bu+o+'c nha?y kho^?ng lo^` cho phong tra`o da^n chu?, vi` Lo+`i Ke^u go.i a^'y la`m chuye^?n ddo^.ng su+. ke^'t lie^n nhu+~ng nha` da^n chu? Vie^.t Nam, nhu+~ng nha` ly khai va` nhu+~ng nha` tranh dda^'u cho nha^n quye^`n thuo^.c ca'c gia ddi`nh to^n gia'o va` chi'nh tri. kha'c nhau. "Chu'ng to^i dda~ ti`m ca'ch pho^? bie^'n Lo+`i Ke^u go.i cu?a Ho`a thu+o+.ng Thi'ch Qua?ng DDo^. ta.i Quo^'c ho^.i Hoa Ky`, va` ddu+o+.c su+. ha^.u thua^~n ro^.ng lo+'n. Mo^.t so^' Da^n bie^?u Ha. vie^.n dda~ ky' bu+'c thu+ u?ng ho^. cuo^.c chuye^?n ho'a o^n ho`a cho da^n chu? ta.i Vie^.t Nam, va` chu'ng to^i hy vo.ng quy' vi. Tha`nh vie^n Lie^n Hie^.p Quo^'c se~ ho^~ tro+. cho nguye^n ta('c co+ ba?n na`y. "Ho`a thu+o+.ng Thi'ch Qua?ng DDo^. du+. ti'nh co^ng bo^' Lo+`i Ke^u go.i na`y ta.i U?y ho^.i Nha^n quye^`n cu?a quy' Vi. o+? Gene`ve, ngay tru+o+'c nga`y khai ma.c DDa.i ho^.i DDa?ng Co^.ng sa?n la^`n thu+' IX. Hy vo.ng ra(`ng, co+ ho^.i dda^`y y' nghi~a na`y se~ co' ta'c ddo^.ng thua^.n lo+.i le^n ca'c nha` la~nh dda.o Vie^.t Nam ve^` gia^'c mo+ cu?a nha^n da^n ho. va` tre^n co^.ng ddo^`ng quo^'c te^' ve^` cuo^.c chuye^?n ho'a o^n ho`a cho da^n chu? ta.i Vie^.t Nam. "Ki'nh thu+, (ky' te^n) Loretta Sanchez Da^n bie^?u Quo^'c ho^.i "DDo^`ng ky' te^n ha^.u thua^~n, ca'c Da^n bie^?u : Frank Wolf, Robert E. Andrews, James P. Moran, Nancy Pelosi, Ike Skelton , Nydia Velazquez, Dennis Kucinich, Sheila Jackson Lee, Gregory Meeks, Henry Waxman, Donald Payne, Tom Davis, William Jefferson, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cynthia McKinney, Mike Honda, Frank Mascara, Chaka Fattah, Joseph Hoeffel, Rob Brady, Dale Kildee, Rep. Baldacci, Vic Snyder, Carolyn McCarthy, Lindsey Graham, John P. Murtha, Ruben Hinojosa, Mike Thompson, Louise Slaughter, Dana Rohrabacher, Lloyd Doggett, Jim McDermott, Chris Smith, Ben Gilman, Maurice Hinchey.
159	Date: 2001-04-06 23:27:36 Vietnamese ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Chemically poisoned HANOI, April 6 (AFP) - Nearly 200 pupils and teachers have been "chemically poisoned" in at least five separate attacks on schools in Vietnam's restive central highlands, official media reported Friday. The casualties, all from two districts, were "seriously poisoned" and "rushed to hospital," the mass circulation trade union daily Lao Dong (Labour) reported in a front-page article. The poisonings were caused by "some strange chemical with a bad smell that had been brought into the classroom by some strangers," it said. The Ho Chi Minh City newspaper Thanh Nien (Youth) said the five attacks, which affected almost 200 pupils and staff, occurred between Tuesday and Thursday in the Ea Kar and Krong Bong districts of Dak Lak province. But the Lao Dong said there was also another classroom attack on a different school on Monday in which more than 40 people were "seriously injured." Both district and provincial police declined to comment on the incidents
158	Date: 2001-04-06 00:42:44 Vietnamese ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Ki'nh thua quy' vi.! Ma^'y nga`y nay ca'i Inbox cu?a to^i no' cu' cho^`ng cha^'t le^n nhu~ng e-mail dda^'u kha^?u cu?a quy' vi. To^i la` ke? ha^.u bo^'i, thuo^.c the^' he^. sau na(m 1975 nhung cu~ng muo^'n ddo'ng go'p mo^.t chu't y' kie^'n. Vu`a ro^`i to^i co' ve^` Vie^.t Nam mo^.t chuye^'n. Tha^.t su. chuye^'n ve^` Vie^.t Nam la^`n na`y to^i uo'c vo.ng co' the^? dduo.c tha(m ba` con va` duo.c vui choi vo'i ba.n ho.c cu? na(m xua cho tho?a thi'ch. Nhung su. tha^.t thi` kho^ng vui gi` ca?. DDa^'t nuo'c Vie^.t Nam ba^y gio` dda~ loa.n he^'t ro^`i. Lo'p tre? mo^.t so^' con nha` gia`u thi` co`n co' tie^`n dde^? ddi ho.c. Co`n dda so^' con nha` nghe`o thi` ddi la`m du dda~ng. Ho.c he^'t lo'p 12 muo^'n xin va`o la`m vie^.c vo'i ddo^`ng luong re? ma.t o? nhu~ng ha~ng cu?a Nam Trie^`u Tie^n (ma` nguo`i da^n Vie^.t Nam go.i la` Ha`n Quo^'c) thi` pha?i ddu't lo't ho^'i lo^. va`i ba chi? va`ng. Sau ddo' la`m dduo.c va`i tha'ng thi` no' ti`m ca'ch dduo^?i ra dde^? nha^.n nguo`i kha'c va`o dde^? kie^'m the^m. Sa`i Go`n thi` dduo.c to^ ne't the^m ba(`ng nhu~ng kie^?u a(n choi tra'c ta'ng ma` chi? co' dda'm ca'n bo^. con hoa(.c nhu~ng da^n buo^n la^.u thi` mo'i co' tie^`n. Hoa(.c la^u la^u la.i xua^'t hie^.n nhu~ng te^n Vie^.t kie^`u ve^` kie^'m ga'i. Ho. a(n choi xa xi? trong khi ddo' thi` da^n ti`nh ddo'i kho^? trong na.n ba~o lu.t. Ra^'t nhie^`u nguo`i pha?i so^'ng theo do.c nhu~ng bo` so^ng ra.ch. Quanh na(m chi? co' mo^.t hai bo^. ddo^`. Con thuye^`n la` noi ho. tru' ngu. quanh na(m. Va^~n co`n nhie^`u tre? em pha?i ba'n ve' so^' hoa(.c ddi a(n xin noi he` pho^'. To^i ddi ra DDa` La.t choi ga(.p ca'c em ba'n ha`ng rong. Chie^`u chie^`u ca'c em ta^.p trung la.i ngay bu`nh binh ddo^'i die^.n cho. DDa` La.t dde^? vui choi ba(`ng nhu~ng tro` choi nha?y da^y. Nhi`n tha^'y ca'c em ma` pha?i ddau lo`ng vi` to^i tu. ho?i kho^ng bie^'t ca'c em co' bao gio` nghi~ vi` ai ma` ca'c em pha?i ddi ba'n ha`ng rong ma` kho^ng dduo.c dde^'n truo`ng ddi ho.c dda`ng hoa`ng. Ca'c em ho^`n nhie^n vui tuoi tha^.t la` dda'ng thuong la('m. Tro? la.i Vie^.t Nam thi` ca`ng tha^'y ddau lo`ng the^m. Kho^ng bie^'t to^i co' the^? la`m gi` dde^? giu'p ddo~ cho ca'c em ddo' ngoa`i vie^.c mua giu'p ca'c em va`i vo^. va`i ca'i gio? xa'ch tay dde^? du`ng cho vie^.c ddu.ng ddo^` ddi cho. Gia' mo^~i ca'i chi? co' hai nga`n ddo^`ng. Nha` nuo'c thi` lu'c na`o cu~ng le^n TV no'i la` co' nhie^`u chuong tri`nh xo'a ddo'i gia?m nghe`o. Cu'u tro. ddo^`ng ba`o nhung tha^.t cha^'t chi? la` ca'i loa pho'ng thanh tuye^n truye^`n ma` tho^i cho' nha` nuo'c chua bao gio` cu'u tro. da^n chu'ng ba(`ng mo^.t phuong thu'c na`o ca? ma` ta^'t ca? nhu~ng tie^`n cu'u tro. na.n nha^n ddie^`u do tu` nuo'c ngoa`i gu?i ve^`. Ta.i vu`ng New England co' ho^.i ddo^`ng huong Qua~ng Nga~i gu?i tie^`n ve^` cho ba` con dde^? cu'u tro. ddo^`ng ba`o bi. ba~o lu.t. Vi` so. nha` nuo'c a(n cha^.n cho ne^n ho^.i ddo^`ng huong Qua~ng Nga~i mo'i nho` nguo`i nha` dde^'n ta^.n nha` na.n nha^n dde^? pha't cho ho. Nhung nha` nuo'c Vie^.t Nam la.i kho^ng cho pha't va` ba?o pha?i trao cho ho. pha't thi` ho. mo'i chi.u. DDa^y la` chuye^.n co' tha^.t 100% va` ne^'u quy' vi. na`o kho^ng tin thi` co' the^? lie^n he^. o^ng Nguye^~n Thanh Bi`nh, ho^.i truo?ng ho^.i ddo^`ng huong Qua~ng Nga~i vu`ng New England thi` se~ bie^'t ro? hon. Gio'i tre? Vie^.t Nam tha^.t su. va^~n chua dduo.c mo? ma('t (qua ca'ch no'i chuye^.n vo'i mo^.t so^' sinh vie^n o? Vie^.t Nam) vi` ho. va^~n co`n chi`m dda('m trong nhu~ng tu* tuo?ng ma` DDa?ng dda~ ca^'y va`o dda^`u ho. tu` nho?. Ho. va^~n co`n cho ra(`ng Ho^` Chi' Minh la` vi. anh hu`ng cu?a da^n to^.c dda~ dda'nh dduo^?i My~, Ngu.y. Ho. va^~n co`n mo tuo?ng ve^` mo^.t the^'t gio'i co^ng ba(`ng ba'c a'i ma` co^.ng sa?n Vie^.t Nam dda~ nho^`i nhe't va`o dda^`u o'c ho. Ki'nh thua quy' vi. DDa^'t nuo'c Vie^.t Nam ba^y gio` la` nhu the^' ddo'. Nha` nuo'c co^ng an thi` ha` hie^'p da^n la`nh. Gio'i tre? muo^'n tro? ve^` giu'p thi` pha?i qua xe't duye^.t cu?a nha` nuo'c. Pha?i tua^n thu? theo nhu~ng quy ddi.nh cu?a nha` nuo'c thi` mo'i dduo.c phe'p da.y sinh ngu~ hay la` da.y ky~ thua^.t cho gio'i tre? Vie^.t Nam. Thu? ho?i mi`nh tro? ve^` da.y sinh ngu~ hoa(.c da.y ky~ thua^.t cho gio'i tre? Vie^.t Nam dde^? cho tu.i no' phu.c vu. che^' ddo^. co^.ng sa?n. Ma` che^' ddo^. co^.ng sa?n ca`ng ma.nh thi` nguo`i da^n ca`ng kho^?. Thu? ho?i co' pha?i la` mi`nh dda~ vo^ ti`nh gia'n tie^'p cho nguo`i kha'c muo.n tay gie^'t nguo`i hay kho^ng? Co' pha?i la` mi`nh dda~ gia'n tie^'p gie^'t da^n cu?a mi`nh kho^ng? Trong dda^`u mi`nh thi` mang mo^.t ly' tuo?ng cao quy' la` mi`nh tro? ve^` nuo'c dde^? giu'p da^n, giu'p nuo'c . Nhung tha^.t su. mi`nh dda~ bi. lu`a ma` mi`nh kho^ng bie^'t. Cho ne^n ddu`ng bao gio` mang mo^.t y' tuo?ng la` tro? ve^` nuo'c dde^? da.y sinh ngu~ hay da.y ky~ thua^.t cho gio'i tre? dde^? ho. sau na`y tha`nh ta`i thi` co' the^? la^.t ddo^? che^' ddo^. co^.ng sa?n hoa(.c la`m suy ye^'u che^' ddo^. co^.ng sa?n. Cha(?ng nhu~ng che^' ddo^. co^.ng sa?n kho^ng bi. suy ye^'u ma` co`n lo'n ma.nh. Lu'c ddo' thi` dda'm da^n dden ca`ng che^'t the^m. Cho ne^n ddu`ng bao gio` bi. say ngu? vo'i nhu~ng lo^'i cho^'ng co^.ng o^n ho`a hay la` da.y ho.c gio'i tre? Vie^.t Nam dde^? ho. thay ddo^?i ly' tuo?ng. Nhu~ng ai co' nhu`ng suy nghi~ na`y la` nhu~ng nguo`i va^~n co`n mo' ngu? nhu ca^u chuye^.n cu?a mo^.t ba` gia` o? Sa`i Go`n nga`y xua dda~ ca?m on ca'c anh gia?i pho'ng qua^n dda~ va`o Sa`i Go`n ki.p tho`i ne^'u kho^ng la` tu.i Vie^.t co^.ng no' ta`n pha' kho^ng co`n gi`. Ma^'y lo`i tho^ thie^?n cu?a mo^.t ke? ha^.u bo^'i cha('c co' le~ se~ la`m cho quy' vi. co' nhie^`u suy nghi~ hoa(.c la` coi nhu the^m mo^.t ca'i junk mail trong Inbox cu?a qui' vi. Mong ra(`ng du` the^' na`o ddi cha(ng nu~a thi` chu'ng ta cu~ng pha?i suy nghi~ mo^.t ca'ch tha^.n tro.ng khi pha?i dduong dda^`u vo'i co^.ng sa?n Vie^.t Nam vi` chu'ng no' ra^'t la` xa?o quye^.t. Hy vo.ng la` mo^.t nga`y na`o ddo' dda^'t nuo'c Vie^.t Nam se~ dduo.c thanh bi`nh. "Ro^`i mo^.t nga`y tro? la.i que^ huong Cho con no'i tu. do muo^n va`n" John Nguyen
157	Date: 2001-04-03 04:19:57 Vietnamese ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Cha(?ng Le~ Tuo^?i Tre? Vie^.t Nam Thua Ke'm Thie^n Ha.? Tra^`n Chu'c Kha'nh Trong nhu~ng nga`y tha'ng vu`a qua to^i co' di.p ga(.p nhie^`u nguo`i tre? tu` Nha^.t Ba?n, DDa.i Ha`n, DDa`i Loan, Ho^`ng Ko^ng va` tu` ca'c nuo'c thuo^.c vu`ng DDo^ng Nam A'. To^i ga(.p ho. khi ngo^`i ddo.i chuye^'n bay dde^? ddi tie^'p qua A^u Cha^u\. Ngo^`i nhi`n ho. vui cuo`i thoa?i ma'i to^i la.i nghi~ dde^'n tuo^?i tre? Vie^.t Nam. Nhung khi no'i dde^'n tuo^?i tre? nuo'c to^i thi` to^i chi? mu`ng cho mo^.t so^' nguo`i tre? ma` tho^i, ddo' la` ca'c ba.n o? ha?i ngoa.i, i't nhie^`u dda~ dduo.c may ma('n huo?ng dduo.c ne^`n va(n minh cu?a nhu~ng nuo'c ta^n tie^'n ... va` quan tro.ng nha^'t, ca'c ba.n tre? a^'y dduo.c so^'ng trong xa~ ho^.i nha^n ba?n, co' tu. do, da^n chu?. Nhung ca'c ba.n tre? trong nuo'c thi` sao ? Nhi`n qua mo^.t va`i con so^' tho^'ng ke^ ve^` Vie^.t Nam ai cu~ng bie^'t la` nuo'c Vie^.t Nam la` mo^.t trong nhu~ng nuo'c nghe`o nha^'t tre^n the^' gio'i, tuo^?i tre? kho^ng co' tuo+ng lai\. Trie^?n vo.ng va` ddie^`u kie^.n cho gio'i tre? o? quo^'c no^.i pha't trie^?n, vuo+n le^n hie^.n nay pha?i no'i la` kho^ng co' ..., hoa(.c ne^'u co' ddi nu~a nhung vi` nuo'c ta hie^.n nay thie^'u ddu'c tri. thi` tuo+ng lai cu?a tuo^?i tre? VN cu~ng ra^'t la` mu` mi.t ma` tho^i\. Khi no'i chuye^.n vo'i nhu~ng nguo`i tre? A' Cha^u kha'c, ho. ra^'t nga.c nhie^n khi tha^'y to^i hie^?u va`i ca^u Nha^.t Ba?n, va`i chu~ tie^'ng Mandarin cu?a Trung Hoa, nhung khi ho. bie^'t to^i nguo`i Vie^.t thi` ... ho. le^~ phe'p ho?i tha(m ti`nh hi`nh trong nuo'c, nhung tha^.t ra ho. kho^ng muo^'n nha('c dde^'n nuo'c na`y nu~a. Nho' la.i truo'c dda^y, khi no'i dde^'n A' Cha^u, nguo`i ta dde^`u nha('c dde^'n Vie^.t Nam ... mo^.t nuo'c vo'i mo^.t li.ch su? va` da^n to^.c anh hu`ng, nguo`i da^n tho^ng minh, ca^`n cu` va` co?i mo?. Danh tu` "Te^'t" la` mo^.t danh tu` nguo`i Ta^y Phuo+ng va` DDo^ng Phuo+ng dde^`u ga('n lie^`n vo'i Vie^.t Nam. Nhung nga`y nay ha^`u nhu* nguo`i ta que^n he^'t nhu~ng chuye^.n ddo'. DDie^`u dda'ng buo^`n ho+n nu~a la` mo^.t so^' nguo`i tre? o? ha?i ngoa.i la('m khi cu~ng nga.i ngu`ng nha^.n mi`nh la` nguo`i Vie^.t. Ho. de` da(.t kho^ng muo^'n cho nguo`i ta bie^'t go^'c ga'c mi`nh la` nguo`i Vie^.t Nam. Vi` sao ? Co' pha?i vi` ho. kho^ng muo^'n nha('c dde^'n mo^.t nuo'c nghe`o na`n ? Hay ho. da^'u go^'c ga'c cu?a mi`nh la` vi` ho. kho^ng muo^'n di'nh li'u gi` dde^'n mo^.t nuo'c duo'i che^' ddo^. phi dda.o ddu'c chi? ddem la.i kho^? ddau cho nguo`i da^n ? Khi no'i chuye^.n va` trao ddo^?i quan nie^.m vo'i nhu~ng nguo`i cu`ng chuye^'n bay, to^i nha^.n tha^'y nguo`i Nha^.t Ba?n, DDa.i Ha`n, va` DDa`i Loan, ba nguo`i ma` to^i co' di.p no'i chuye^.n nhie^`u nha^'t ..., ho. ra^'t ha~nh die^.n ve^` dda^'t nuo'c cu?a ho., kho^ng chi? vi` nuo'c cu?a ho. dda~ pha't trie^?n mau, nuo'c ho. gia`u va` ma.nh ma` vi` ho. ha~nh die^.n vo'i nhu~ng gi` nuo'c ho. dda~ dda.t dduo.c tre^n la~nh vu.c xa~ ho^.i. Nguo`i ba.n tre? DDa`i Loan no'i vo'i to^i la` anh ra^'t ha~nh die^.n anh la` nguo`i DDa`i Loan vi` nuo'c anh ba^y gio` co' da^n chu? tha^.t su. !! Chuye^.n na`y dda~ la`m cho to^i phu.c anh ba.n DDa`i Loan na`y, vi` anh kho^ng dda(.t va^'n dde^` pho^`n thi.nh pha't trie^?n le^n truo'c ma` la` tu. do va` da^n chu? !! Ca? ba nguo`i ba.n va` to^i dda~ ddo^`ng y', khi da^n co' tu. do, thi` nie^`m tu. tro.ng va` tu. tin cu?a mo^~i ca' nha^n se~ cho ho. nhie^`u nghi. lu.c dde^? cu`ng nhau xa^y du.ng xa~ ho^.i va` dda^'t nuo'c. Co`n Vie^.t Nam thi` sao ? To^i xin dda(.t ca^u ho?i na`y vo'i tuo^?i tre? Vie^.t Nam. The^' ky? 20 dda~ qua, nhi`n la.i que^ huo+ng mi`nh, nguo`i tre? na`o ma` kho^ng ca?m tha^'y buo^`n ra^`u, ray ru't va` tu?i nhu.c trong khi ca'c nuo'c da^n chu? tre^n the^' gio'i thu hoa.ch dduo.c nhu~ng buo'c tie^'n nha?y vo.t, thi` Vie^.t Nam mi`nh la.i tu` tu` lu`i va`o ti`nh tra.ng be^' ta('c, ta^`m thuo`ng va` que^n la~ng. DDa^'t nuo'c dda~ ma^'t ra^'t nhie^`u co+ ho^.i pha't trie^?n, bao nhie^u ta`i nguye^n va` tri' tue^. cu?a Vie^.t Nam dda~ bi. pha' hu?y trong ma^'y chu.c na(m qua, cu~ng vi` da^n Vie^.t Nam ddang va` pha?i chi.u kho^? duo'i nhu~ng nguo`i ca^`m quye^`n phi nha^n, thie^'u hie^?u bie^'t va` kho^ng co' dda.o ddu'c. Thie^.t ha.i lo'n nha^'t la` Vie^.t Nam dda~ ma^'t qua' nhie^`u tho`i gian, va` tho`i co+ thua^.n lo.i\. Nguo`i Vie^.t Nam dda~ ma^'t nie^`m tin va`o nha` nuo'c ... va` ma^'t ngay ca? nie^`m tin va`o kha? na(ng va` su'c lu.c cu?a chi'nh mi`nh !! Chi? ca^`n nghi~ dde^'n nhu~ng nguo`i ba.n A' Cha^u to^i ga(.p ta.i phi truo`ng, va` chi? ca^`n nghi~ dde^'n nuo'c cu?a ho. ... DDa`i Loan, DDa.i Ha`n, Ma~ Lai, Tha'i Lan, v.v ... ma` tie^'c cho Vie^.t Nam. Ho. cu~ng co' ddo^.c la^.p, ho. cu~ng co' tu. do, ho. co' da^n chu?, va` ho. dda~ dda.t dduo.c nhu~ng mu'c ddo^. pha't trie^?n dda'ng ke^? va` dda'ng ne^?. Co`n Vie^.t Nam ? Co`n nguo`i da^n Vie^.t Nam ? ... Nguo`i da^n Vie^.t Nam pha?i so^'ng trong mo^.t xa~ ho^.i ma` chi? co' tie^`n, quye^`n lu.c va` ba.o lu.c mo'i so^'ng no^?i tho^i ... dde^? cuo^'i cu`ng dda^'t nuo'c ro+i va`o la.c ha^.u, chu'ng kie^'n su. pha't trie^?n huye^~n hoa(.c, da^n nghe`o ddo'i, tuo^?i tre? kho^ng tuo+ng lai\. Vo^ le~ nguo`i da^n Vie^.t Nam la.i thua ke'm nguo`i Tha'i, nguo`i Phi, nguo`i Nam Duo+ng ? Tri`nh ddo^. nguo`i Vie^.t tha^'p ho+n ho. ? Vo^ le~ tuo^?i tre? Vie^.t Nam thua tuo^?i tre? Nam Duo+ng, kho^ng da'm ddo`i ho?i tu. do, da^n chu? dde^? ddua dda^'t nuo'c va`o con dduo`ng pha't trie^?n la`nh ma.nh va` xa^y du.ng mo^.t xa~ ho^.i nha^n ba?n ? Vo^ le~ tuo^?i tre? tre^n kha('p the^' gio'i dde^`u muo^'n thay ddo^?i nhu~ng la.c ha^.u lo^~i tho`i ba(`ng nhu~ng tie^'n bo^., thay ddo^?i ddo^.c ta`i chuye^n che^' ba(`ng da^n chu? tu. do trong khi do' chi? co' tuo^?i tre? Vie^.t Nam la.i thu. ddo^.ng dde^? dduo.c an tha^n ti`m vie^.c la`m so^'ng qua nga`y kho^ng y' nghi~a ? To^i ra^'t la.c quan la` tuo^?i tre? Vie^.t Nam, o? ha?i ngoa.i la^~n trong nuo'c, se~ vuo.t qua the^' thu. ddo^.ng va` bi quan na`y\. Ne^'u tuo^?i tre? nuo'c kha'c dda~ la`m dduo.c thi` kho^ng co' ly' do gi` ma` tuo^?i tre? Vie^.t Nam kho^ng la`m dduo.c !! Con dduo`ng ma` to^i mong gio'i tre? Vie^.t Nam cho.n lu.a ... ddo' la` ddu'ng le^n ddo`i ho?i quye^`n lo.i cu?a mi`nh va` cu?a da^n to^.c. DDo`i ho?i tu. do va` nha^n quye^`n la` nhu~ng ddo`i ho?i chi'nh dda'ng, va` ho.p ly' dde^? ta.o ddie^`u kie^.n thua^.n lo.i cho vie^.c xa^y du.ng mo^.t xa~ ho^.i o^?n ddi.nh an la.c, va` pha't trie^?n ha`i ho`a dda^'t nuo'c mo^.t ca'ch vu~ng be^`n. Con dduo`ng na`y se~ ra^'t da`i va` ca^`n su. da^'n tha^n va` kie^n tri` cu?a ta^'t ca? chu'ng ta\. Co' the^? the^' he^. tuo^?i tre? hie^.n nay pha?i tra? gia' ra^'t cao, nhung ne^'u nghi~ dde^'n ke^'t qua? la^u da`i cho mai sau thi` to^i tin ra(`ng ca'c the^' he^. sau se~ ha~nh die^.n vo'i the^' he^. ddi truo'c ... dda~ ddem la.i tu. tin, tu*. ha`o cho da^n to^.c Vie^.t Nam.
156	Date: 2001-04-02 04:16:11 Vietnamese ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Ma^`m mo^'ng cu?a tu+. die^.t VB, 29/3/01 So+n DDie^`n Nguye^~n Vie^'t Kha'nh Nhu+~ng kho' kha(n cu?a dda?ng Co^.ng sa?n Vie^.t Nam hie^.n nay kho^ng la`m ai nga.c nhie^n bo+?i vi` no' dda~ chu+'a sa(~n ma^`m mo^'ng cu?a su+. tu+. die^.t. Kho^ng pha?i ba^y gio+` chu? nghi~a co^.ng sa?n dda~ thoa'i tra`o tre^n kha('p the^' gio+'i, ngu+o+`i ta mo+'i ddu+a ra nha^.n ddi.nh na`y. Ngay tu+` dda^`u tha^.p nie^n 50, khi Lie^n Xo^ co`n ma.nh, nhie^`u ho.c gia? tre^n the^' gio+'i dda~ no'i nhu+ va^.y va` chi? dde^'n cuo^'i the^' ky? 20, ngu+o+`i ta dda~ tha^'y lo+`i tie^n ddoa'n kho^ng sai. Nhu+ng ne^'u ba?o chu? nghi~a co^.ng sa?n mang theo ma^`m mo^'ng cu?a tu+. die^.t, ta.i sao no' co' kha? na(ng ta.o ra mo^.t Lie^n Xo^ hu`ng cu+o+`ng, dda'nh ba.i Quo^'c xa~ DDu+'c va` nha^?y le^n ha`ng sie^u cu+o+`ng nguye^n tu+?, la~nh dda.o kho^'i Xo^ vie^'t ki`nh cho^'ng ngang ngu+?a vo+'i sie^u cu+o+`ng My~ va` kho^'i NATO trong mo^.t cuo^.c chie^'n la.nh ke'o da`i ga^`n 40 na(m? Ca^u tra? lo+`i la` mo^.t su+. nghi.ch ly': ca`ng ma.nh ca`ng che^'t le., vi` ma^`m mo^'ng tu+. die^.t cu?a Co^.ng sa?n na(`m trong su+'c ma.nh cu?a no'. Va^.y ca'i ma^`m che^'t ddo' la` ca'i gi`? Ha~y tro+? la.i li.ch su+? cu?a chu? nghi~a Co^.ng sa?n vo+'i tu+ tu+o+?ng pha't sinh ra no' tu+` tho+`i cuo^'I the^' ky? 19. Nga`y nay dda~ co' ra^'t nhie^`u kha?o lua^.n va.ch ra nhu+~ng sai la^`m cu?a chu? nghi~a Ma'c (tu+` te^n o^ng to^? Karl Marx), ke^? ca? nhu+~ng ta`i lie^.u cu?a nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i na(`m trong che^' ddo^. o+? trong nu+o+'c ta'n pha't ra ngoa`i. Chu'ng to^i chi? xin ghi nha^.n, vi` lua^.n cu+' ra^'t xa'c dda'ng nhu+ng qua' da`i, kho^ng the^? to'm lu+o+.c trong mo^.t ba`i ba'o nga('n chuye^n theo do~i tho+`i cuo^.c. Ca'c nha` ho.c gia? cu~ng nhu+ nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i co' kinh nghie^.m so^'ng du+o+'i che^' ddo^. co^.ng sa?n dde^`u co' chung mo^.t nha^.n ddi.nh: ca'i xa~ ho^.i "xa~ ho^.i chu? nghi~a" cu?a Ma'c du+. kie^'n chi? la` mo^.t xa~ ho^.i kho^ng tu+o+?ng. Ngu+o+`i ta dda~ bie^'t khung ca?nh li.ch su+? ve^` ca'c ma(.t tu+ tu+o+?ng, chi'nh tri., kinh te^', xa~ ho^.i cu?a A^u cha^u khi Karl Marx vu+`a mo+'i 30 tuo^?i ddu+a ra nhu+~ng lua^.n cu+' ve^` su+? quan va` duy va^.t bie^.n chu+'ng pha'p, dda(.t na(.ng nguye^n ly' giai ca^'p dda^'u tranh dde^? kha(?ng ddi.nh ke^'t thu'c se~ ddu+a dde^'n mo^.t xa~ ho^.i ly' tu+o+?ng cho loa`i ngu+o+`i. Pha`m dda~ la` ngu+o+`i, ai cu~ng muo^'n so^'ng trong mo^.t xa~ ho^.i an vui tha'i bi`nh, "kho^ng co' ngu+o+`i bo'c lo^.t ngu+o+`i", gio^'ng nhu+ mo^.t "thie^n dda`ng" o+? ma(.t dda^'t. Marx la` mo^.t ngu+o+`i co' ly' tu+o+?ng na(.ng ve^` nha^n dda.o, kho^ng le~ o^ng muo^'n xa^y du+.ng mo^.t xa~ ho^.i ngu+o+`i a(n thi.t ngu+o+`i? Nhu+ng ca'i xa~ ho^.i "ddi.a dda`ng" cu?a o^ng kho^ng the^? co' trong hie^.n thu+.c va` ho+n 100 na(m sau, the^' gio+'i dda~ thay ddo^?i, xa~ ho^.i con ngu+o+`i dda~ co' nhu+~ng tha'ch thu+'c Karl Marx kho^ng the^? na`o ngo+` to+'i. Nhu+ng ne^'u no' kho^ng thu+.c hie^.n ddu+o+.c thi` tho^i cho+' ta.i sao la.i di ho.a cho ha^.u the^'? Mo^'i ho.a kho^ng na(`m trong cu+'u ca'nh ma` na(`m o+? phu+o+ng tie^.n, tu+'c la` ca'ch thu+'c dde^? thu+.c hie^.n ca'i mu.c tie^u ha~o huye^`n ddo'. Trong Tuye^n ngo^n dda?ng Co^.ng sa?n, mo^.t ca^?m nang dde^? la.i cho ca'c dde^. tu+?, Marx no'i muo^'n tie^'n le^n xa~ ho^.i "xa~ ho^.i chu? nghi~a" cu?a o^ng, giai ca^'p vo^ sa?n ca^`n pha?i chie^'m la^'y quye^`n chuye^n chi'nh. Mo.i che^' ddo^. ddo^.c ta`i dde^`u co' su+'c ma.nh a'p dda?o. Su+. pha^n ddi.nh hai giai ca^'p vo^ sa?n va` hu+~u sa?n (tu+'c tu+ ba?n) dda~ sai, ba^y gio+` chu? tru+o+ng mo^.t che^' ddo^. chuye^n chi'nh (tu+'c ddo^.c ta`i cai tri.) cu?a mo^.t giai ca^'p duy nha^'t la.i ca`ng sai ho+n nu+~a. No' ga^y ho.a cho ta^'t ca? mo.i con nguo+`i so^'ng du+o+'i che^' ddo^. chuye^.n chi'nh ddo', ga^y ho.a cho ca? dda?ng Co^.ng sa?n na('m quye^`n toa`n tri.. Ta.i sao va^.y? Bo+?i vi` ba^'t cu+' che^' ddo^. ddo^.c ta`i dda?ng tri. na`o cu~ng chi? ddu+a dde^'n na.n tham nhu~ng. Chuye^n chi'nh ca`ng ma.nh, tham nhu~ng ca`ng lo+'n. Va` ddo' chi'nh la` ma^`m mo^'ng cu?a su+. tu+. die^.t. O+? dda^y to^i kho^ng muo^'n no'i dde^'n nhu+~ng ly' lua^.n cao xa cu?a ca'c nha` trie^'t ho.c, to^i chi? muo^'n ddu+a ra mo^.t hi`nh a?nh "the^' tu.c" de^~ hie^?u. Ca'i ca^?m nang tha`nh la^.p dda?ng Co^.ng Sa?n cu?a Marx cu~ng gio^'ng nhu+ mo^.t bi' ki'p vo~ co^ng cu?a ca'c chuye^.n chu+o+?ng, no' ra^'t lo+.i ha.i, chi? hie^`m no' ddi va`o ba`ng mo^n ta? dda.o. Bi' ki'p cu?a Ma'c cu~ng gio^'ng nhu+ mo^n "Tha^'t Thu+o+ng Quye^`n" cu?a Ta. To^'n trong chuye^.n chu+o+?ng cu?a Kim Dung. Luye^.n mo^n vo~ co^ng na`y se~ tro+? tha`nh anh hu`ng vo^ ddi.ch thie^n ha., chi? kho^? luye^.n no' la` tu+. ta.o ra ba^?y no^.i thu+o+ng trong ca'c huye^.t dda.o cu?a mi`nh. Ca`ng luye^.n, no^.i thu+o+ng ca`ng na(.ng. DDa^y chi'nh la` ddi.nh lua^.t nghi.ch ly': vo~ ca`ng ma.nh, no^.i thu+o+ng ca`ng tha^'m va` khi no' le^n dde^'n o'c la` ho^'i kho^ng ki.p vi` he^'t thuo^'c chu+~a. Ne^'u no'i nhu+ va^.y ta.i sao mo^.t che^' ddo^. Co^.ng sa?n nhu+ Ba('c Ha`n, tu+. be^' quan luye^.n mo^n "Tha^'t Thu+o+ng Quye^`n" tu+` la^u la.i kho^ng che^'t? O+? dda^y co' mo^.t ddi.nh lua^.t mo+'i ma` tu+` khi he^'t chie^'n tranh la.nh ngu+o+`i ta mo+'i tha^'y ro~. DDo' la` ne^'u ddo'ng cu+?a ma` luye^.n thi` co`n kha' vi` chi? che^'t tu+` tu+`, nhu+ng ne^'u mo+? cu?a dde^? khi' ddo^.c tha^'m va`o co+ the^? thi` che^'t ra^'t mau. Ca'i "khi' ddo^.c" ddo' mo.i ngu+o+`i ba`ng quan dda~ tha^'y, ddo' la` su+. du nha^.p kinh te^' thi. tru+o+`ng. Chuye^n chi'nh co' ba`n tay sa('t ma'u, bo'p che^'t mo.i toan ti'nh pha?n kha'ng cu?a ngu+o+`i da^n, vi` ddo'ng cu?a ki'n mi't khua^'t ma('t kho^n coi, ne^n che^' ddo^. ddu+o+.c tu+. do nga('c ngoa?i...cho dde^'n khi no^.i bo^. bu`ng no^?. DDa^y la` the^' mo+? cu~ng che^'t ma` kho^ng mo+? cu~ng che^'t, chi? co' so+'m hay muo^.n. O+? Vie^.t Nam che^' ddo^. ddo^.c ta`i dda?ng tri. dda~ so^'ng ddu+o+.c tu+` na(m 1954 o+? mie^`n Ba('c vi` tu+. be^' mo^n, la^'y co+' chie^'n tranh thoa di.u no^~i ba^'t ma~n cu?a da^n, tie^u die^.t nhu+~ng pha?n u+'ng tu+. nhie^n trong co+ the^? che^' ddo^.. Tu+` 1975, chie^'m ddu+o+.c toa`n the^? la~nh tho^?, dda?ng va^~n la^'y chie^u ba`i "Chu? nghi~a Ma'c-Le^ ba'ch chie^'n ba'ch tha('ng" vo+'i the^' kie^u binh ho^"quye^'t ta^m tie^'n le^n xa~ ho^.i chu? nghi~a". Nhu+ng khi dda~ ne^'m mu`i ca'c "chie^'n lo+.i pha^?m" cu?a mo^.t mie^`n Nam pho^`n vinh tru` phu', ca'c con sa^u tham nhu~ng tie^`m a^?n tu+` la^u dda~ thu+`a tha('ng xo^ng le^n hoa`nh ha`nh. Chi'nh ca'c con sa^u tham nhu~ng na`y dda~ hu`a va`o vie^.c cha^'p nha^.n kinh te^' thi. tru+o+`ng dde^? co^.t va`o ddo' ca'i dduo^i "ddi.nh hu+o+'ng xa~ ho^.i chu? nghi~a". To^? chu+'c dda?ng la` mo^.t to^? chu+'c co^`ng ke^`nh, ddi song song vo+'i to^? chu+'c chi'nh quye^`n tu+` ca^'p ddi.a phu+o+ng tha^'p nha^'t cho dde^'n ca^'p trung u+o+ng cao nha^'t, ne^n to^?n phi' ra^'t lo+'n. Va^.y nga^n sa'ch dda?ng o+? dda^u ra, ne^'u kho^ng tu+` ca'c con sa^u tham nhu~ng mo+'m cho dda?ng ma.nh? Ba^y gio+` dda?ng "dda~ tha^'y quan ta`i".
155	Date: 2001-04-01 01:28:47 Vietnamese ( no email / no homepage) wrote: HA` NO^.I, Vie^.t Nam (TH) -- Ca'c vie^n chu+'c nha` nu+o+'c CSVN ho^m Thu+' Ba 27 tha'ng Ba dda~ xa'c nha^.n nguo^`n tin cho hay da^n la`ng thuo^.c khu vu+.c sinh so^'ng cu?a ngu+o+`i Thu+o+.ng thuo^.c ti?nh Gia Lai mo+'i dda^y dda~ giao chie^'n vo+'i co^ng an khi ho. trie^.t pha' mo^.t ca(n nha` du`ng la`m no+i tho+` phu+o+.ng cu?a "ho^.i tha'nh tu+ gia" mo+'i dda^y. DDa^y la` nhu+~ng chi tie^'t dda^`u tie^n ve^` nhu+~ng gi` dda~ xa?y ra ho^m 10 tha'ng Ba ta.i ti?nh Gia Lai, lie^n quan dde^'n ca'c no^~ lu+.c nha(`m dda`n a'p to^n gia'o cu?a chi'nh quye^`n CSVN va` kie^?m soa't ngu+o+`i da^n thie^?u so^' tu+` khi xa?y ra ca'c cuo^.c no^?i da^.y ho^`i tha'ng Hai na(m nay. Co' ba ngu+o+`i, bi. nha` ca^`m quye^`n CSVN cho la` trong tha`nh pha^`n la~nh dda.o, la` ca'c o^ng Siu Puoh, Siu Thuc va` Kpa Thap cu`ng ca'c tha`nh pha^`n "ngoan co^' kha'c" dda~ bi. co^ng an ba('t giu+~ trong khi ho. ti`m ca'ch nga(n cha(.n kho^ng cho lu+.c lu+o+.ng an ninh CSVN tha'o ro+~ mo^.t ngo^i nha` du`ng la`m no+i tu. ho.p tho+` phu+o+.ng cu?a ti'n ddo^` Tin La`nh trong la`ng Plei Lao, thuo^.c huye^.n Chu+ Xe^, na(`m ca'ch ti?nh ly. Pleiku chu+`ng ho+n 55 ca^y so^' ve^` phi'a nam. Theo mo^.t chu+'c co^ng an ddi.a phu+o+ng ye^u ca^`u ddu+o+.c da^'u te^n thi` co' mo^.t so^' ngu+o+`i dda~ bi. thu+o+ng trong cuo^.c xo^ xa't giu+~a da^n chu'ng ngu+o+`i Gia Rai va` co^ng an. Mo^.t vie^n chu+'c nha` nu+o+'c CSVN ta.i Chu+ Xe^ cho hay ra(`ng co' ba ngu+o+`i dda~ bi. ba('t "vi` dda~ buo^.c da^n la`ng ddo'ng tie^`n xa^y nha` tho+`". Ca'c to^? chu+'c nha^n quye^`n quo^'c te^' dda~ thu+o+`ng xuye^n le^n a'n nha` nu+o+'c CSVN ve^` vie^.c dda`n a'p to^n gia'o ta.i Vie^.t Nam, dda(.c bie^.t nha('m va`o ti'n ddo^` Tin La`nh thuo^.c ca'c "gia'o ho^.i tu+ gia" nga`y ca`ng pha't trie^?n ma.nh me~ trong ca'c khu vu+.c sinh so^'ng cu?a ngu+o+`i Thu+o+.ng. Bo^. ngoa.i giao My~ mo+'i dda^y cu~ng dda~ ke^u go.i Ha` No^.i dde^? ca'c vie^n chu+'c ngoa.i giao Ta^y Phu+o+ng ddu+o+.c dde^'n ti`m hie^?u ti`nh hi`nh ta.i vu`ng na`y. Va`o nga`y Thu+' Ba, pha't ngo^n vie^n bo^. ngoa.i giao CSVN, ba` Phan Thu'y Thanh, no'i ra(`ng "kha'ch ngoa.i quo^'c chi? co' the^? dde^'n tha(m khi na`o ca'c vie^n chu+'c ddi.a phu+o+ng co' thi` gio+` ddo'n tie^'p".
154	Date: 2001-03-31 19:10:50 Vietnamese ( no email / no homepage) wrote: > Party graft in Vietnam gets more serious - paper > > > HANOI, March 30 (Reuters) - While the number of incidents of detected > corruption involving members of Vietnam's Communist Party has fallen > in recent years, cases have become more serious, official media said > on Friday. > > The Saigon Giai Phong (Saigon Liberation) said on average 0.86 > percent of party members had been disciplined each year over the past > five years, down from more than 1.0 percent in the previous five-year > period. > > But the newspaper said cases were more serious and organised > corruption among officials had made it more difficult for the party > to fight graft. > > "The violations committed by Party cadres have not declined as the > characteristic has been more serious," the party newspaper said. > > "The fact that a smaller number of party members have been > disciplined...does not reflect the reality," it said. > > A recent survey by the Hong Kong-based Political and Economic Risk > Consultancy found Vietnam the most corrupt country in Asia, scoring > 9.75 on a scale of ten. > > The party launched a campaign in May 1999 aimed at rooting out graft > and mismanagement, but leaders have admitted it has fallen short of > expectations. > > "Recent big cases have exposed the organised corruption with > involvement of various levels, branches, localities, units and people > who have 'connections' and 'umbrellas' to protect and shield > themselves," the newspaper said. > > The Saigon Giai Phong said in some cases, while the party had > announced disciplinary steps, prompt and sufficient punishment by the > government had failed to follow. > > The report comes after the Party Central Committee announced last > week it had disciplined five senior officials for mismanagement. > > Defence Minister Pham Van Tra and army chief of staff Le Van Dung > were reprimanded while two ministerial-rank officials and a senior > executive were given official warnings. > > Hoang Duc Nghi, ministerial-rank head of the committee for ethnic > minorities and mountainous areas, and Doan Van Kien, director-general > of Vietnam National Coal Corp, were disciplined for failing to stop > corruption and misuse of funds, state media reported earlier this > week. > > Earlier in March, official media said the Party Politburo had sacked > three other senior officials, including two province chiefs, > for "mistakes and wrongdoings." >
153	Date: 2001-03-31 19:02:55 Vietnamese ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Vie^.t Nam tham nhu~ng nha^'t A' Cha^u TIN HO^`NG KO^NG (Little Saigon Radio, 19/3/01) -- Trong tho+`i ha^.u chie^'n thi` che^' ddo^. Co^.ng Sa?n Ha` No^.i dda~la`m ddu+o+.c gi` cho dda^'t nu+o+'c Vie^.t Nam? Theo mo^.t nghie^n cu+'u quo^'c te^' mo+'i dda^y, Vie^.t Nam ddang la` quo^'c gia tham nhu~ng nha^'t A' Cha^u. Mo^.t co+ quan ta.i Ho^`ng Ko^ng co' te^n la` Co^' Va^'n Ru?i Ro Kinh Te^' Va` Chi'nh Tri. (Political & Economic Risk Consultancy Ltd) va^~n thu+o+`ng theo do~i ti`nh hi`nh ta.i ca'c quo^'c gia A' Cha^u. Trong mo^.t tho^'ng ke^ ddu+o+.c thu+.c hie^.n tu+` dda^`u na(m cho dde^'n nay, ca'c doanh gia va` gia'm ddo^'c quo^'c te^' la`m vie^.c ta.i A' Cha^u dda~cho bie^'t Vie^.t Nam la` quo^'c gia tham nhu~ng nha^'t trong so^' 12 quo^'c gia A' Cha^u. Tre^n mo^.t thu+o+'c ddo ti'nh tu+` so^' 0 i't tham nhu~ng dde^'n so^' 10 tham nhu~ng to^'i dda, Vie^.t Nam dda~da^~n dda^`u vo+'i 9.75 ddie^?m. Na.n tham nhu~ng ta.i Vie^.t Nam dda~a(n sa^u tu+` ca'n bo^. ca^'p tha^'p cho dde^'n ha`ng la~nh dda.o. Xe^'p ha.ng nhi` tre^n danh sa'ch tham nhu~ng la` Nam Du+o+ng, mo^.t quo^'c gia tu+`ng da^~n dda^`u tru+o+'c dda^y. A^'n DDo^., Phi Lua^.t Ta^n, Tha'i Lan va` Trung Co^.ng dda~xe^'p ca'c ha.ng tie^'p theo. Trong khi Vie^.t Nam da^~n dda^`u danh sa'ch tham nhu~ng thi` Ta^n Gia Ba la` no+i trong sa.ch nha^'t, vo+'i ddie^?m tham nhu~ng chi? la` 0.83. Nha^.t Ba?n va` Ho^`ng Ko^ng dda~xe^'p ha.ng to^'t sau Ta^n Gia Ba. Nghie^n cu+'u ddu+o+.c thu+.c hie^.n thu+o+`ng xuye^n nha('m giu'p ca'c doanh gia co' the^? quye^'t ddi.nh tru+o+'c khi dda^`u tu+ va`o ca'c quo^'c gia A' Cha^u.
152	Date: 2001-03-31 18:54:20 Vietnamese ( no email / no homepage) wrote: By TINI TRAN, Associated Press Writer HANOI, Vietnam (AP) - Villagers clashed with police after authorities tore down a Protestant church in the central highlands province of Gia Lai recently, officials said Tuesday. The events of March 10 offer the first detailed account obtained by The Associated Press of Vietnam's efforts to control religious practices and clamp down on ethnic unrest since February protests in the area. Three men identified as protest leaders, Siu Puoh, Siu Thuc and Kpa Thap, and other ``stubborn elements'' were arrested for trying to stop police from dismantling a prayer house in Plei Lao hamlet in Chu Se district, 35 miles south of the provincial capital of Pleiku, a local police official said on condition of anonymity. The official said some people were wounded in the clash between members of the Jarai tribe and police. The official refused to say how many people were arrested or how many officers were involved. A Chu Se district official said that the three men arrested as leaders forced villagers to donate money to build the wooden prayer house. International human rights groups have criticized Vietnam for religious repression, citing its crackdown on Protestant ``house churches'' which have taken hold in ethnic minority areas. Last month, thousands of mainly Christian hill tribespeople protested in the central highlands provinces of Gia Lai and Daklak against land encroachment and government repression of their Protestant faith. Vietnam accused a U.S.-based exile group, the Montagnard Foundation, of instigating the unrest, saying the group sought an independent nation for ethnic minority people. The U.S. State Department has urged Hanoi to grant diplomats access to the region. On Tuesday, a Foreign Ministry spokeswoman said, ``Foreign visitors are welcome when local governments can arrange their schedules.'' Vietnam's poor record on human rights and religious freedom is expected to be a major obstacle to a trade deal with the United States. Email this story More from > Asian News from AP
151	Date: 2001-03-31 18:21:25 Vietnamese ( no email / no homepage) wrote: KAY JOHNSON, Hanoi Even in the most cynical of times, "wicked" and "traitor" are rarely words that come to mind when describing a priest. But then, Father Nguyen Van Ly is no ordinary priest. The 53-year-old Catholic cleric has already spent nine years in prison, and last week he was in trouble again. Vietnamese authorities detained him in the central town of Hue and jailed two of his assistants. State-run newspapers obediently denounced him; one daily ran a photo of the priest holding a crucifix, under the headline: people's traitor unmasked. In most countries, such vitriol would signal the ugliest of scandals, perhaps involving choirboys. Father Ly's crime? Challenging the government. Last month, the priest sent a letter to U.S.Congressmen urging them to reject ratification of a bilateral trade agreement until Vietnam grants greater freedom of worship. Hanoi's retaliation against Father Ly was swift, but it may be backfiring and could dim chances for the treaty's ratification. Members of the U.S. House of Representatives' powerful International Relations Committee have vowed to bring up the issue in hearings that could start as early as next month. The action against Father Ly�weeks after the reported strip-search of a prominent Buddhistdissident and the government's crushing of riots in the predominantly Christian central highlands�looks to some like Hanoi is thumbing its nose at American human rights concerns. "It's just vindictive," fumes Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican on the committee who is vowing to block ratification. "It basically shows complete contempt�for human rights and for the United States." If the religion issue is stirring up trouble in Washington, it's nothing compared with what's going on at home. By most accounts, Vietnam is in the midst of a multi-faith religious revival. Buddhist festivals are common nationwide. And Catholics take their own annual pilgrimage to a site where the Virgin Mary is said to have appeared. Last year, 200,000 of Vietnam's five million Catholics attended. Like China, Vietnam tolerates religious devotion in churches that are under effective Communist Party administration, but the government appears anxious about the rise of renegade sects. The advocacy group Freedom House recently published "top secret" documents it claims are party directives aimed at suppressing evangelical Christianity, the country's smallest but fastest-growing religion. One document, "The Problem of the Enemy Exploiting Religion," describes a purported plot by "U.S. imperialists" to convert ethnic minorities and then encourage them to topple the government. Yet Hanoi insists that every citizen has the right to religion, pointing to its millions of worshipers. Phan Thi Lan Huong is one of them. Surrounded by clouds of incense, the 59-year-old grandmother clutches her hands in prayer in front of an altar ringed with painted Buddhas. She is one of up to 20,000 who flock each day to the Chua Huong Pagodas southwest of Hanoi during the pilgrimage season. "Of course we are free to worship," she says, blinking with surprise. "The government never stops us�just those who have bad practices." The paradox is actually codified in Vietnam's laws: every citizen is guaranteed the right to worship, but "abuse of religious rights" is punishable by up to three years in prison. According to Zachary Abuza, a Vietnam expert at Simmonds College in the U.S., it is not individual faith that Hanoi opposes, but the prospect of a nationwide structure of authority that could topple the party's monopoly on power. Hanoi has thus appointed Vietnam's Catholic bishops since 1975, annoying the Vatican, which recently elevated an exiled Vietnamese bishop to cardinal. There are dissident priests in Vietnam, like Father Ly, but more troublesome are followers of the outlawed Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam, which won't allow state advisers. "The Communist Party considers churches to be another arm of the state," Abuza says. "Any deviance is dealt with harshly." But not as harshly as before. Father Ly may have been hauled in, "re-educated" and placed under church arrest, but he has not been jailed, as he was in 1983. There are other examples of official softening: Hanoi recently recognized the formerly banned Protestant Christian churches and the Hua Hao Buddhist sect. U.S. Ambassador Pete Peterson, who flew to Washington last week to lobby for the trade agreement, believes blocking the trade accord would send the wrong message. "The greatest thing we can do for human rights," he says, "is to increase economic activity." The Communist Party, for its part, seems to know that persecuting religions can actually make them more alluring. The Freedom House documents, which purport to be the party's strategies for suppressing evangelical Christianity, makes this observation: "The numbers grow slowly if we have a relaxed policy, and if we crack down harder, it grows faster." Even the party is realizing it's difficult to beat anyone fighting a holy war.
150	Date: 2001-03-31 02:38:53 Vietnamese ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Xet tre^n khi'a ca.nh mo^.t trang web dde^? cha`o co+` thi` trang na`y ta.m o^?n ( tuy nhie^n ne^n tham kha?o trang web cu?a CPUssr se~ tha^'y ho. la`m trang nghie^m ho+n dda^'y). Tuy co' ddie^`u buo^`n cu+o+`i la` quo^'c ca cu?a VNCH la.i la` do o^ng co^.ng sa?n Lu+u Hu+~u Phu+o+c vie^'t....hehehe Pha't hie^.n ra co' commie so^'ng o+? USA thi` sao?? DDi.nh ke'o nhau -de^'n gie^'t ngu+o+`i ta cha('c? Sao ma` xa~ ho^.i -den the^'? Tha^.t -da'ng buo^`n.
149	Date: 2001-03-30 19:19:57 a nephew of a former captain of the "vietnam-ranger" ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Your site delights me. The current Government is antidemocratical and so it is our duty to fight against this organisationd and I am ready to sacrifice my life in a new war to rebuild our democratic Government. We should honour all the soldiers who have died in Vietnam during their fight against the communism and its lie and the protection os democracy.#
148	Date: 2001-03-27 03:57:56 tran dan tien ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Monday March 26, 10:47 AM Vietnam restricts travel by dissident Buddhist By David Brunnstrom HANOI (Reuters) - Vietnam said on Sunday it had slapped travel restrictions on the leader of a Buddhist sect who reported being detained and beaten last week after organising a protest at which supporters planned to burn themselves to death. The Quan Doi Nhan Dan (People's Army) newspaper said Le Quang Liem, chairman of a dissident branch of the Hoa Hao sect, had been put under "administrative surveillance" for two years for using religious freedom to propagandise against the state. The order, which bars Liem from travelling outside a set area without permission, was effective from March 17. "He has many times gathered and agitated bad elements in the Hoa Hao to oppose Party and state policies on religion," the paper quoted Ho Chi Minh City police Captain Nguyen Van Muoi as saying. He said that, in the latest case, Liem had organised a demonstration, mostly of women, in the city's Le Van Tam park on March 17 when participants had planned to set themselves on fire. It quoted police as saying the protesters had banners and gasoline and seven packs of gasoline-soaked cotton. Last week, the U.S.-based Overseas Hoa Hao Buddhist Association said the 75-year-old director of the Hoa Hao Buddhist Women's League, Nguyen Thi Thu, had doused herself with petrol and burned herself to death in a village in southern Vietnam on March 19 in a protest to demand religious freedom. Officials in a village in Vinh Long province said they had found the charred body of a woman by a roadside, but rejected the suicide report and said it looked more like a murder case. Liem reported being detained by police in Le Van Tam park early on March 17 and being held in custody for 30 hours before being allowed to return to his home under police guard. COUNCIL FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM He told a source who spoke to him by telephone he was beaten by police in detention and that his house was guarded by about 20 officers. The source said Liem had said he had refused to sign a document agreeing to spend two years under house arrest. Last month, Liem and three other dissident religious leaders formed the Vietnam Interfaith Council to promote religious freedom. One, Catholic priest Thadeus Nguyen Van Ly, was put under restriction earlier this month after urging the U.S. Congress not to ratify a historic trade pact with Vietnam because of rights abuses. Vietnam's communist government is under heightened scrutiny in the United States because of the pact and U.S. officials have warned ratification could be complicated by rights issues. The newspaper said Liem was being treated leniently because of his age. "The local authorities only took him for an assessment session before the people, creating conditions for him to realise his wrongdoings so he will end his violations of the law and actions opposing the people's aspirations and true Hoa Hao followers," it added. The Hoa Hao are a neo-Buddhist sect combining Buddhism, animism, Confucianism and indigenous practices. They claim about four million adherents in Vietnam and have long complained of persecution stemming from their armed opposition to communism during the Vietnam war. Hanoi recognises a mainstream Hoa Hao church organisation but radicals from the sect, who have made suicide attempts and threatened immolations in the past, are not tolerated. Several Buddhist monks burned themselves to death in famous protests in the early 1960s against religious repression by the then government of South Vietnam. Pictures of one such immolation created some of the most enduring images of the Vietnam War.
147	Date: 2001-03-22 03:40:31 Son Truong ( bolyvn@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: toi khong rat thich trang web nay
146	Date: 2001-03-17 03:39:26 nguoi Viet Nam ( no email / no homepage) wrote: URGENT: NEWS FLASH. MR. LE QUANG LIEM, CHAIRMAN OF THE HOA HAO BUDDHIST CHURCH OF VIETNAM, CAPTURED AND IMPRISONED. The Overseas Hoa Hao Buddhist Associaiton, headquartered in Derwood, MD, received news from Saigon, Vietnam that Mr. Le Quang Liem, has been captured. At 5:00 AM March 17, 2001 (Vietnam time), over two dozen uniformed and plain cloths police officers arrested Mr. Le Quang Liem near Le Van Tam Park, District 1, Saigon Vietnam. At this time, Mr. Le Quang Liem has been transferred back to District 1 Police Barricks, Saigon Vietnam. Fellow Hoa Hao Buddhists have gathered infront of District 1 police barricks to protest and demand the release of Mr. Le Quang Liem. Several eye witnesses reported that a doezen uniformed and plain cloths officers brutally attacked and arrested Mr. Le Quang Liem. Currently, we do not know what condition Mr. Le Quang Liem is in. As news is received from Vietnam, the Overseas Hoa Hao Buddhist community will release further details. Background information about Mr. Le Quang Liem. Mr. Le Quang Liem is 82 years old. He is a resident of Quan Phu Nhuan, Saigon Vietnam. Since 1997 to the present, Mr. Le Quang Liem has spearheaded a campaign for religious freedom in Vietnam and religious freedom for Hoa Hao Buddhism. At present, Mr. Le Quang Liem is the Chairman of the Hoa Hao Buddhist Church of Vietnam and Deputy Chairman of the Vietnam Interfaith Council in Vietnam. After the establishment of the Vietnam Interfaith Council with Venerable Thich Thien Hanh, Reverend Nguyen Van Ly and Reverend Chan Tin on February 5, 2001, all members of the Interfaith Council were harassed and brutally attacked by Vietnam's state run media. The main purpose of the Interfaith Council is to promote Religious Freedom and Human Rights for Vietnam. For questions, please contact the following individuals: 1. Mr. Nguyen Van Coi, 301.675.5761, coi3450@pghh.org 2. Mr. Le Van Huong "Henry", 408.640.7800, bathotnot@aol.com 3. Mr. Nguye Chau, 301.520.9265, cnguyen54@yahoo.com 4. Overseas Hoa Hao Buddhist Association Office, webmaster@pghh.org News Source: Mr. Le Van Hien, Hoa Hao Buddhist Church of Vietnam Saigon, Vietnam March 16, 2001 07:00 PM
145	Date: 2001-03-17 02:31:18 Nguyen Van Phong ( vanpcnguyen@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Hey everybody, I found a commie living in the US. His napster screen name is VietnamPeopleArmy.
144	Date: 2001-03-12 16:48:44 Adam Le ( Adamle@vietfun.com / http://www.cashmoney.com) wrote: I am proud to be Vietnamese! Lets rise above the racial oppression of other countries, and kill them all!
143	Date: 2001-03-12 04:55:25 PATTI ( no email / no homepage) wrote: JUST AN UPDATE AS I HAVE NOT HEARD A WORD FROM MY EMAIL TO THE VIET NAM EMBASSY IN WASHINGTON, DC. I SHALL CONTINUE TO FLOOD THEM WITH EMAILS. I URGE ALL PEOPLE TO EMAIL THE EMBASSY THERE, AND EXPRESS YOURSELF REGARDING THE MIA/POW ISSUE. MY HEART GOES OUT TO EACH AND EVERYONE OF THE PEOPLE THERE IN NAM THAT ARE WANTING FREEDOM AND A BETTER LIFE. I ASK OTHERS TO PRAY THAT THERE WILL BE AN AWAKENING IN THAT COUNTRY, AND THAT THE PEOPLE WILL OVERPOWER THE COMMUNIST. TO ANY OF OUR AMERICAN MIA/POW'S THAT MIGHT BE ABLE TO STILL BE ALIVE THERE IN NAM, I JUST WANT TO SAY "MANY OF US IN AMERICA, AND THRU OUT THE WORLD, HAVE NOT FORGOTTEN YOU." I ASK OTHERS TO PLEASE KEEP THE LETTERS AND EMAILS GOING TO THE VIET NAM EMBASSY IN WASHINGTON, DC. ALSO PLEASE KEEP THE EMAILS AND LETTERS GOING TO YOUR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS TO LET THEM KNOW WE WANT ALL OUR MIA/POW'S ACCOUNTED FOR, BRING THEM HOME. SINCERELY, PATTI THANKS FOR READING THIS, TO THOSE THAT BELIEVE, PLEASE PRAY THAT THIS SHALL BECOME A REALITY SOON.
142	Date: 2001-03-12 01:59:33 Nguyen Van Phong ( vanpcnguyen@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: I feel the same way you do about not having a chance to fight in Vietnam, Harvey Nguyen, but I was fortunate enought to have been in the American Military (AMH2, US Navy, HSL-49 and USS Kinkaid). The reason I was in - because my father fought the war in Vietnam, it's kind of like a family tradition, and yes, I was once educated under the communist system, but only in first grade, and I left the country in second grade by boat to Thailand.
141	Date: 2001-03-02 20:58:16 Harvey Nguyen ( harveyhnguyen@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Dear fellow Vietnamese, I was not fortunate enough to get a chance to fight for the freedom of our country's destiny against the 'Yankees' from the North. In fact, I was educated under the evil system from second grade to twelve grade that tried to turn me into a 'little' communist. It just turned out the opposite. The fact that Vietnam today is one of the poorest country in the world and its people's basic rights have been denied are the results of more than 25 years (the entire country)being ruled by the Communists. These are the people that have applied all kinds of theories and methods that have hisrorically failed in China, Soviet Union, and in many other countries. If someone says someday Vietnam will become an Asian economic tiger, I would bet my mortgate payment that as long as the Communists are in power, there is no way Vietnam would be able to catch up other countries in the region like Thailand or even the Philipines. I occasionally joke with my colleagues that Vietnam is a stupid country because it has been represented by a stupid government for more than 25 years and, more importantly, against the will of its own people. I wish that someday Ho Chi Minh, an evil Communist, will be tried for his criminal acts committed against Vietnamese people. I was once punished by my literature professor for refusing to learn a poet allegedly written by Ho Chi Minh. Ho Chi Minh's grave in Hanoi should be smashed into pieces because he was the guy who caused all the adversities and hardships for the Vietnamese people. And all the resouses went into building and maintaining his grave could have been used, according to my calculations, to build as least 30 big high schools, or an equivelent of 10 decent universities for Vietnamese people. The Communists have to understand that history won't be kind with them. I strongly support the Republic of Vietnam's flag and it is a symbol of unity of Vietnamese people who love liberty. Regards, Harvey Nguyen
140	Date: 2001-03-02 03:12:07 paul c. conlon ( pcconlon2002@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: I served three and a half years in RVN. Both mil. and civilian service. It is still my adopted country forever.
139	Date: 2001-02-26 00:19:04 VietNam ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Le^ Vi~nh VNN, 22/02/01 - DDa~ qua ro^`i tho+`i co^.ng sa?n Vie^.t Nam tha ho^` ta`n sa't, va` co' ddu? kie^?u dde^? ta`n sa't ba^'t cu+' ai dda?ng muo^'n. Cu~ng dda~ qua ro^`i ca'i tho+`i ma` dda?ng tha ho^` ba('t giu+~ nhu+~ng ai dda?ng kho^ng u+a, ddu+a ddi ta^.p trung ca?i ta.o kho^ng co' nga`y ve^`. DDo' la` tho+`i huy hoa`ng ho^'ng ha'ch cu?a dda?ng, vi` lu'c ddo' the^' gio+'i be^n ngoa`i chu+a nhi`n va`o, da^n chu'ng trong nu+o+'c co`n khie^'p so+. ba.o lu+.c chuye^n chi'nh cu?a dda?ng. Nay ti`nh hi`nh dda~ ddo^?i kha'c, nha^'t cu+? nha^'t ddo^.ng cu?a dda?ng kho^ng the^? che da^'u ddu+o+.c the^' gio+'i be^n ngoa`i. Da^n chu'ng trong nu+o+'c kho^ng nhu+~ng kho^ng so+., ma` co`n coi thu+o+`ng, khinh mie^.t dda?ng. Bo+?i va^.y, ngoa`i nhu+~ng tro` co^ la^.p, ga^y kho' de^~ mo^.t ca'ch vo^ co+', la`m tro` cu+o+`i cho the^' gio+'i va` da^n chu'ng, thi` dda?ng va^~n lu'ng tu'ng chu+a bie^'t la`m sao dde^? nho^? cho ddu+o+.c nhu+~ng ca'i gai la`m dda?ng nhu+'c nho^'i, trong ddo' pha?i ke^? nhu+~ng tri' thu+'c pha?n kha'ng, nhu+~ng dda?ng vie^n pha?n ti?nh. DDa(.c bie^.t va` ga^`n dda^y nha^'t la` nhu+~ng vi. la~nh dda.o va` ddo^`ng ba`o ca'c to^n gia'o quye^'t ta^m giu+~ dda.o, kho^ng ba'n linh ho^`n cho dda?ng.... DDa?ng dda~ kho^ng the^? du`ng cu+o+`ng quye^`n dde^? dde` be.p ddu+o+.c tinh tha^`n dda^'u tranh cu?a gia'o da^n Nguye^.t Bie^`u, An Truye^`n, cu?a ha`ng trie^.u ti'n ddo^` Ho`a Ha?o o+? mie^`n Nam, cu?a nhu+~ng vi. cha^n tu Pha^.t Gia'o va` ddo^`ng ba`o pha^.t tu+? kha('p nu+o+'c. Su+. kie^.n na`y ca`ng ddu+o+.c to? ro~ qua qua le^~ Trai DDa`n Cha^?n Te^' o+? Hue^'. DDa?ng dda~ du`ng ddu? mo.i thu? ddoa.n dde^ he`n dde^? co^' pha' cho ba(`ng ddu+o+.c tua^`n le^~ ca^`u nguye^.n truye^`n tho^'ng na`y cu?a da^n to^.c. Su+. do.a da^~m, hoa.nh ho.e cu?a co^ng an ddi.a phu+o+ng; su+. nga(n ca^'m, ga^y kho' kha(n, nga(n tro+? cu?a dda?ng o+? kha('p no+i;.... ta^'t ca? no^~ lu+.c qua^'y pha' ddo' dda~ kho^ng ddem la.i ke^'t qua? nhu+ dda?ng muo^'n. Ha`ng nga`n ddo^`ng ba`o va^~n ba^'t cha^'p co^ng an, vu+o+.t qua bao kho' kha(n dde^? ve^` du+. le^~. Ne^'u kho^ng co' su+. nga(n cha(.n nga`y dde^m cu?a dda?ng thi` cha('c cha('n con so^' ddo^`ng ba`o tham du+. le^~ Trai DDa`n Cha^?n Te^' pha?i ddo^ng dda?o vo^ cu`ng. Tha^'t ba.i trong vie^.c pha' le^~ Trai DDa`n, dda?ng ba('t dda^`u le^n gio.ng chua^?n bi. cho nhu+~ng cuo^.c dda`n a'p, ba('t bo+' ma` co' the^? dda?ng se~ thu+.c hie^.n dde^? go+~ the^? die^.n ... dde^? ra ca'i ddie^`u dda?ng va^~n na('m giu+~ quye^`n lu+.c. DDie^`u dda'ng buo^`n la` nhu+~ng ddie^`u dda?ng ddang le^n gio.ng kho^ng giu'p cho bo^. ma(.t cu?a dda?ng sa'ng su?a ho+n, ma` chi? khie^'n cha^n tu+o+'ng ke'm va(n minh, su+. lo so+. bi. ma^'t quye^`n lu+.c, ... cu?a dda?ng lo^. ro~ ho+n. Thu+.c va^.y, lua^.n cu+' "tu+. do to^n gia'o la`m xa'o tro^.n xa~ ho^.i" tu+. no' dda~ cho tha^'y su+. to^'i ta(m ngu do^'t cu?a dda?ng, vi` no' vu+`a tra'i ngu+o+.c thu+.c te^', vu+`a tra'i ngu+o+.c vo+'i chi'nh nhu+~ng gi` dda?ng va^~n thu+o+`ng re^u rao. Trong the^' gio+'i loa`i ngu+o+`i nga`y nay, dda?ng co^.ng sa?n kho^ng the^? na`o ne^u le^n ddu+o+.c no+i na`o ma` tu+. do to^n gia'o dda~ khie^'n da^~n dde^'n xa'o tro^.n xa~ ho^.i\. Chi? co' the^? do ngu do^'t, va` do co^' y' nha^.p nha(`ng, dda?ng muo^'n lie^n he^. dde^'n mo^.t so^' ca'c cuo^.c tranh cha^'p to^n gia'o o+? mo^.t va`i no+i. Nhu+ng, ne^'u hie^?u bie^'t ho+n thi` dda?ng co^.ng sa?n se~ tha^'y la` nhu+~ng tranh cha^'p ddo' xua^'t pha't tu+` nhie^`u nguye^n nha^n kha'c chu+' kho^ng lie^n quan gi` dde^'n tu+. do to^n gia'o. DDa(.c bie^.t la` o+? Vie^.t Nam, hie^.n nay kho^ng he^` co' va^'n dde^` tranh cha^'p to^n gia'o, ma` ngu+o+.c la.i, co`n cho tha^'y tinh tha^`n ddoa`n ke^'t to^n gia'o cao ddo^. nha^'t tu+` tru+o+'c dde^'n nay. Ba?n tuye^n bo^' chung mo+'i dda^y cu?a 4 to^n gia'o lo+'n la` mo^.t ddie^?n hi`nh. Tu+. do to^n gia'o kho^ng nhu+~ng kho^ng la`m xa'o tro^.n xa~ ho^.i, ma` ngu+o+.c la.i co`n la` mo^.t ddie^`u kie^.n go'p pha^`n o^?n ddi.nh xa~ ho^.i. Ta.i nhu+~ng nu+o+'c ta^y phu+o+ng gia`u co', ddie^?n hi`nh nhu+ Hoa Ky`, khi ddo+`i so^'ng va^.t cha^'t qua' thu+`a tha~i, thi` to^n gia'o kho^ng nhu+~ng la` ddie^?m tu+.a tinh tha^`n cu?a con ngu+o+`i, ma` chi'nh phu? cu~ng tro^ng ca^.y ra^'t nhie^`u va`o ca'c sinh hoa.t to^n gia'o dde^? giu'p gia?m thie^?u nhu+~ng ma(.t tie^u cu+.c cu?a xa~ ho^.i. Trong ddo', nhu+~ng co+ quan thie^.n nguye^.n, gia'o du.c, cu?a ca'c to^n gia'o dda~ go'p pha^`n ra^'t lo+'n trong vie^.c o^?n ddi.nh xa~ ho^.i. O+? Vie^.t Nam, du` to^n gia'o bi. ki`m ke.p, nhu+ng chi? mo^.t va`i sinh hoa.t ha.n che^' cu?a ca'c to^n gia'o, ha^`u he^'t vu+o+.t qua kho?i su+. ca^'m ca?n cu?a dda?ng, dda~ xoa di.u pha^`n na`o su+. tho^'ng kho^? cu?a ddo^`ng ba`o. Ne^'u ddu+o+.c tu+. do sinh hoa.t, cha('c cha('n to^n gia'o se~ co' nhie^`u ddo'ng go'p ti'ch cu+.c va` dda da.ng ho+n cho xa~ ho^.i. Ha~y la^'y thi' du. ve^` nhu+~ng cuo^.c cu+'u tro+. ba~o lu.t mo+'i dda^y. Trong khi ca'c vie^n chu+'c dda?ng a(n cha(.n ha`ng kho pha^?m va^.t cu+'u tro+., thi` chi'nh ca'c to^n gia'o dda~ va^.n ddo^.ng, va` pha^n pho^'i ta^.n tay ddo^`ng ba`o na.n nha^n nhu+~ng nguo^`n cu+'u tro+. lo+'n lao cu?a ddo^`ng ba`o ha?i ngoa.i, ma` to^?ng so^' su+. cu+'u tro+. cu?a nha` nu+o+'c, cu?a nu+o+'c co^.ng sa?n Cu Ba, va` nu+o+'c gia`u nha^'t the^' gio+'i la` My~ cu~ng kho^ng sa'nh ba(`ng. Ve^` ma(.t ly' lua^.n thua^`n tu'y, ta ha~y ddo.c la.i pha^`n no'i ve^` to^n gia'o trong du+. tha?o chi'nh tri. cu?a dda.i ho^.i IX cu?a dda?ng, trong ddo' re^u rao la`: "thu+.c hie^.n nha^'t qua'n chi'nh sa'ch to^n tro.ng va` ba?o dda?m quye^`n tu+. do ti'n ngu+o+~ng va` kho^ng tu+. do kho^ng ti'n ngu+o+~ng to^n gia'o, quye^`n sinh hoa.t to^n gia'o bi`nh thu+o+`ng theo ddu'ng pha'p lua^.t...", so sa'nh vo+'i lua^.n cu+' "tu+. do to^n gia'o la`m xa'o tro^.n xa~ ho^.i", ngu+o+`i ta se~ tha^'y, su+. re^u rao cu?a dda?ng, va` lua^.n cu+', cu~ng cu?a dda?ng, ddo^'i cho.i chan cha't vo+'i nhau ra sao, do ddo' kho^ng ca^`n pha?i ba`n the^m. Co' le~ cu~ng trong su+. chua^?n bi. du+ lua^.n cho nhu+~ng cuo^.c dda`n a'p to^n gia'o ma` dda?ng co' the^? se~ thu+.c hie^.n, ba'o Nha^n Da^n cu?a dda~ cu~ng pha?n u+'ng gia^.n giu+~ ddo^'i vo+'i cuo^.c ddie^`u tra^`n ta.i u?y ban to^n gia'o quo^'c ho^.i Hoa Ky`, cu~ng nhu+ su+. ho^~ tro+. ddo^`ng loa.t cu?a ddo^`ng ba`o cho tua^`n le^~ Trai DDa`n, the^? hie^.n qua nhu+~ng buo^?i le^~ to^n gia'o o+? kha('p ca'c chu`a chie^`n, tha'nh ddu+o+`ng, tha'nh tha^'t, va` ca'c no+i tho+` tu+.,... tu+` U'c Cha^u sang A^u Cha^u, Ba('c My~. Bo^. ma(.t cu?a dda?ng co^.ng sa?n tu+. no' vo^'n dda~ me'o mo' va` lo. lem dde^'n cu+.c ddo^., ne^n cu~ng cha(?ng ai co' the^? bo'p me'o va` bo^i lo. the^m ddu+o+.c nu+~a nhu+ ba'o Nha^n Da^n than phie^`n. The^' nhu+ng, ba'o Nha^n Da^n la.i tu+. bo^i dden the^m ma(.t cu?a dda?ng mo+'i la` ddie^`u dda'ng no'i. Ha~y ddo.c ddoa.n sau dda^y cu?a ba'o Nha^n Da^n va` ddo^'i chie^'u vo+'i thu+.c te^': "Chu'ng to^i dda~ nhie^`u la^`n tuye^n bo^' ro~ ra`ng la` kho^ng co' ai bi. ba('t o+? Vie^.t Nam vi` to^n gia'o hay ti'n ngu+o+~ng cu?a ho.. Mo^.t so^' nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i theo dda.o Pha^.t va` nhu+~ng to^n gia'o kha'c bi. ba('t vi` ho. dda~ pha.m pha?i nhu+~ng lo^~i la^`m cho^'ng la.i lua^.t pha'p Vie^.t Nam va` ca^`n pha?i ddu+o+.c xu+? ly' theo lua^.t pha'p". Ha~y tro+? la.i thi' du. ma` ai cu~ng dda~ bie^'t, ddo' la` vie^.c cu+'u tro+. na.n nha^n ba~o lu.t. Ho`a Thu+o+.ng Thi'ch Qua?ng DDo^. dda~ ddi cu+'u tro+. dde^? co^' ga('ng trao ta^.n tay ddo^`ng ba`o na.n nha^n pha^?m va^.t cu+'u tro+.. La`m nhu+ the^' tu+'c la` Ho`a Thu+o+.ng Thi'ch Qua?ng DDo^. cho^'ng la.i lua^.t pha'p, ne^n bi. ba('t. Ne^'u Ho`a Thu+o+.ng Thi'ch Qua?ng DDo^. ngoan ngoa~n trao tie^`n ba.c cho nha` nu+o+'c dde^? ca'c vie^n chu+'c dda?ng tha ho^` a(n cha(.n, ddu.c khoe't tre^n dda^`u tre^n co^? cu?a ca'c na.n nha^n co+ kho^? thi` mo+'i ddu'ng theo lua^.t pha'p, va` kho^ng bi. ba('t hay sao? So sa'nh vo+'i nhie^`u thu+.c te^' tu+o+ng tu+., ngu+o+`i ta se~ tha^'y su+. kho^i ha`i va` ngo^ nghe^ trong lo+`i dda~ ddu+o+.c ba'o Nha^n Da^n tuye^n bo^' nhie^`u la^`n vu+`a ne^u. DDie^`u na`y mo^.t la^`n nu+~a cho tha^'y co+ quan tho^ng tin, ly' lua^.n cu?a dda?ng, du` co' quanh co thi` cu~ng chi? ddu+a ra ddu+o+.c nhu+~ng ly' lua^.n chu+?i la^~n nhau, tra'i ngu+o+.c vo+'i thu+.c te^' va` co' khi chu+?i ca? dda?ng. Lua^.n cu+' "tu+. do to^n gia'o la` la`m xa'o tro^.n xa~ ho^.i" cu~ng na(`m trong tru+o+`ng ho+.p na`y. Vi`, qua thu+.c te^' o+? kha('p no+i, ai cu~ng tha^'y la`, chi'nh tu+. do to^n gia'o dda~ go'p pha^`n giu'p xa~ ho^.i tha(ng tie^'n, chu+' kho^ng he^` ga^y ne^n ba^'t o^?n. DDu+a ra lua^.n cu+' na`y, dda?ng ddang muo^'n ta.o ne^n mo^.t ca'i co+' ra^'t la` lo^' bi.ch dde^? co' the^? de^~ be^` dda`n a'p. The^' nhu+ng, ma^'y na(m vu+`a qua cho tha^'y, tru+o+'c ca'i du~ng cu?a gio+'i tri' thu+'c pha?n kha'ng, cu?a nhu+~ng dda?ng vie^n pha?n ti?nh, cu?a nhu+~ng vi. la~nh dda.o to^n gia'o cha^n chi'nh, cu`ng vo+'i su+. ddo^`ng ti`nh cu?a ddo^`ng ba`o mo.i gio+'i, va` su+. ho^~ tro+. cu?a ddo^`ng ba`o ha?i ngoa.i, co^.ng vo+'i su+'c e'p cu?a quo^'c te^',...mo^~i la^`n dda?ng ddi.nh gio+? tro` dda`n a'p la` mo^.t la^`n dda?ng pha?i thu.t lu`i, nhu+o+.ng bo^. tru+o+'c cao tra`o dda^'u tranh cho tu+. do da^n chu? cho Vie^.t Nam. Nay dda~ qua ro^`i ca'i tho+`i dda?ng tha ho^` hoa`nh ha`nh muo^'n ba('t, muo^'n gie^'t ai tu`y thi'ch.
138	Date: 2001-02-20 20:34:34 BUI-KHAC H�o ( hao.bk@worldonline.fr / no homepage) wrote: T�i th�nh th�.t co/ d�i lo'\i khen ngo'.i quy. vi. L�u la)/m r�\i t�i mo'/i co/ di.p nghe du'o'.c b�i qu�/c ca n�\y. Hay la)/m, hay la)/m. Xin da ta.
137	Date: 2001-02-16 12:51:27 Phong ( vanpcnguyen@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: How come I can't play the anthem with lyric, I have real audio.
136	Date: 2001-02-09 09:35:08 Nguyen Hong Phong ( saigontudo@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Trong doi toi, lan dau tien toi moi nhin thay la co nay. Du sao di nua, doi voi toi day moi la la co trong trai tim toi. Than ai,
135	Date: 2001-02-06 06:09:59 PATTI ( no email / no homepage) wrote: THANK YOU NGUOI QUOC GIA FOR THE INFORMATION, I DID EMAIL THE EMBASSY IN WASHINGTON, DC. HAVE NOT HEARD BACK FROM ANYONE. THANK YOU FOR POSTING THE INFORMATION HERE. GOD BLESS. PATTI
134	Date: 2001-01-29 19:51:00 Phong ( no email / http://www.agevp.com) wrote: As a Vietnamese student in France, I hope that our 300,000 soldiers have not died for nothing. We must remember their sacrifice, especially to slower the communist's advance in Spring 75. The VCs are barbarians, they've killed their relatives ( Tet 68 ), and now they're proud to have an embassy in the US. But our flag still reminds us that the Republic Of Vietnam is a great nation, with good citizens all over the world. That's why the flag must go on floating.
133	Date: 2001-01-29 15:21:08 Joseph Pham ( no email / no homepage) wrote: To make more clearer THE WILL OF VIETNAMESE PEOPLE is Freedom, Democracy and Human Rights from which none of these is existed with the current communist goverment in Vietnam. The flag of the Republic of Vietnam with three red stripes and gold is being reflected for those-mentioned rights. I totally support this website and urge readers to do the same. Thanks.
132	Date: 2001-01-26 22:59:01 Andrew Sy Pham ( PAandrew@aol.com / http://www.angelfire.com/nc2/andrewsypham) wrote: I believe that the flag of Vietnam should reflect the will of the people.
131	Date: 2001-01-25 15:58:18 Nguoi Quoc Gia ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Dear Patti : You can send an email to Vietnam Embassy in Washington DC at info@vietnamembassy-usa.org .But I don't think they help you anything as Vietnamese communist never tell the truth. I am praying for you all and Good luck !!!
130	Date: 2001-01-25 06:23:30 PATTI ( no email / no homepage) wrote: DEAR Nguoi Quoc Gia, THANK YOU FOR POSTING TO MY STATEMENT HERE. BY ANY CHANCE DOES ANYONE HAVE AN EMAIL ADDRESS WHERE I COULD SEND AN EMAIL TO THE VIETNAMESE COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT? I SURE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW. I BELIEVE THAT THE QUESTION OF MIA IS RESTED WITH EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US THAT WANT TO SEE ALL OUR MIA/POW'S RETURNED. AS AN AMERICAN, I BELIEVE THAT WE HERE IN AMERICA ARE THE GOVERNMENT, WE ELECT THOSE IN OFFICE TO SERVE OUR COUNTRY AND IT SHOULD BE THEIR DUTY TO REPRESENT NOT ONLY US HERE IN AMERICA BUT ALSO THEIR DUTY TO MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO ACCOUNT FOR EACH AND EVERYONE OF OUR MIA/POW'S, THEREFORE, WE NEED TO CONSTANTLY REMIND THOSE WE ELECT TO OFFICE THROUGH OUR LETTERS, OUR EMAILS. FROM WHAT I HAVE BEEN HEARING IN THE NEWS RECENTLY REGARDING OUR MIAS, MAYBE THOSE IN OUR GOVERNMENT ARE FINALLY LISTENING...WE SURE PRAY SO. I WEAR A YELLOW RIBBON ON MY CLOTHING EVERY DAY AS A REMINDER TO MYSELF AS WELL AS OTHERS. TODAY SOMEONE ASKED ME, WHY THE YELLOW RIBBON ON MY JACKET, MY REPLY, "TO DAILY REMIND MYSELF AND OTHERS OF OUR MIA/POW'S." GOD BLESS EACH OF US AS WE ENDEAVER TO LIVE IN THIS COMPLICATED WORLD, AND TO EACH OF US AS WE TRY TO DO WHAT EACH CAN, TO MAKE THIS A BETTER PLACE FOR OUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN, OURSELVES AS WELL AS EACH OTHER. THANK YOU TO THE PEOPLE RESPONSABLE FOR THIS SITE. SINCERELY,PATTI
129	Date: 2001-01-23 17:55:59 Nguoi Quoc Gia ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Dear Patti (No 128) : The question of MIA is rested with US and Vietnamese Communist governments. As experienced, you alwaysdo'nt know what's the communist doing as they never tell the truth. We believe some MIAs might be alive as communists did during the French war and its MIAs. They had used POW/MIAs for bargaing. One possible theory is that they put POW/MIAs far away in rutral vicinities and happily get married with Vietnamese women there. Communist later on claim that they did not know and argued that those MIAs volunteerily stayed in Vietnam, do not go back to US therfore don't blame on us (Vietnamese govement).
128	Date: 2001-01-22 07:50:41 PATTI ( no email / no homepage) wrote: I RETURNED FOR A VISIT TO THIS SITE, I HAD POSTED HERE AWHILE BACK, I WANT TO SAY IT IS SO IMPORTANT FOR EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US TO WRITE OR EMAIL OUR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND LET THEM KNOW WE WANT ALL OUR MIA/POW'S ACCOUNTED FOR. FOR EACH AND EVERYONE OF THEM, IF THERE BE ANY STILL ALIVE, WHICH WE BELIEVE THERE ARE, WE PRAY THAT THEIR LIGHT OF HOPE AND OURS WILL BECOME A REALITY AND THAT THEY WILL BE BROUGHT BACK HOME TO THE UNITED STATES. PLEASE KEEP THE EMAILS GOING TO THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, AMERICANS CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE, LET US JOIN TOGETHER, MAKE A DIFFERENCE FOR OUR MIA/POW'S. SINCERELY, PATTI
127	Date: 2001-01-20 16:34:36 ho ci minh ( hcm@trt.com / http://www.hh.com) wrote: Chung may dien thi hay cai nhau di. Tao khong tin Cong san, cung khong tin chung may! Godfather.
126	Date: 2001-01-11 23:11:38 NguoiDanMienNam ( no email / no homepage) wrote: To 125: Du Me Mien Bac vo cuop mien Nam ma cu noi To quoc. Doi song may day du vi may an chan com cua cac tre em mo coi, cua tien vien tro nan lut. Nhung nguoi an may, cac co gai phai bo xu qua Mien lam diem cung do Tui May an chan moi co doi song day du cho dau ma ra. May khong biet nhuc ma con khoe.
125	Date: 2001-01-11 12:18:23 Patriot ( patriot@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Goi "dong chi" 123. Toi da hoan thanh nghia vu quan su, hien nay dang mang ham thieu uy. Toi da giai ngu va tro ve gia dinh sinh song. Toi dang cong tac tai mot cong ty quoc doanh, doi song kha day du. Neu To Quoc lam nguy, Quoc Gia bi bon My, Nguy... xam chiem. Toi va rat rat nhieu nguoi khac san sang mac ao linh de tiep tuc chien dau gin giu Que Huong. Chung may co ngon thi ve day danh nhau voi ong. Dung o ben do ma cho mom keu goi phan dong ! Nhuc lam ! Hen lam !
124	Date: 2001-01-09 00:52:03 Ly Thuy ( no email / no homepage) wrote: XIN CHUYE^?N DDI TIE^'NG KE^U THU+O+NG CU?A HUE^' (Nha^n ddo.c Lo+`i Ke^u Go.i So^' 4 cu?a LM. Nguye^~n Va(n Ly') Ai co' nghe nhu+~ng nghe.n nga`o tho^'ng thie^'t Cu?a ai vang Lo+`i Ke^u Go.i dda^'y kho^ng ? O^i nhu+~ng tie^'ng ke^u le^. pha ta^m huye^'t Bo+?i lu+o+~i dao kia che'm ngo.t xuo^'ng lo`ng! Ne^'u dda~ nghe, xin ngu+o+`i ddu+`ng quay ma(.t Ho+~i ba^.c Cha^n tu, Gia'o si~, Ti'n ddo^` ! Khi cu'i xuo^'ng dde^? vo^ tha^`n a'p dda(.t La` tu+. mi`nh cha^'p nha^.n nhu+~ng cay chua... La` a'nh dduo^'c soi ddu+o+`ng cho DDa.o Pha'p Xin ra tay co+?i tro'i tru+o+'c cho mi`nh Co' Vo^ Nga~ trong Vo^ Cu`ng Tue^. Gia'c Thi` mo+'i dda.t tha`nh cu+'u ro^~i chu'ng sinh ! O^i nhu+~ng lo+`i ke^u xe' gan, xe' ruo^.t Trong nghe.n nga`o, trong nu+o+'c ma('t ddau thu+o+ng Ha~y ddu+'ng le^n xo'a ba^'t co^ng, ra`ng buo^.c DDe^? Tu+. Do To^n Gia'o ddu+o+.c tru+o+`ng to^`n Xin chuye^?n tie^'ng ke^u thu+o+ng na`y cu?a Hue^' DDe^'n ba mie^`n dda^'t nu+o+'c Ba('c -Trung - Nam Kho^ng ba.o lu+.c na`o vu+o+.t qua Cha^n Ly' Ha~y sa'ng cho ddo+`i dduo^'c lu+?a vinh quang... Ngo^ Minh Ha(`ng
123	Date: 2001-01-08 13:47:41 Dang Bo Ha Noi ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Goi anh 119: Nhi�t Li�t Ca Ngoi Tinh Th�n Y�u Nuoc cua anh, Chung toi se d� nghi anh duoc trung tuyen Nghia Vu Qu�n Su va l�n bi�n gioi phia Bac chong lai bon Banh Truong Bac Kinh hoac duoc tham gia vao luc luong Thanh nien xung kich de xay dung T� Qu�c. De Nghi anh c�m thu nay toi Dai Su Quan gan noi anh cu ngu nh�t d� dang ky. Dang Bo Ha Noi
122	Date: 2001-01-07 22:40:54 VN ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Xin ca'c ba.n giu'p cho -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tu` mo^.t nguo`i ba.n go?i dde^'n ho. nho` pho^? bie^'n vi` co' lie^n quan dde^'n ti'nh ma.ng linh mu.c Nguye^~n Va(n Ly' . MT Xin qu'y vi va` qu'y anh chi. ca('t (CUT) ca'c ddia chi ngay dduo'i dday va` PASTE va`o ddia chi? dde^'n (TO) dde gui thu* dden quy vi Giam Muc cho ddo~ ma^'t thi` gio` qu'y vi. pha?i ngoi vie^'t tu`ng ddia chi? va` co' the^? sai so't. Xin nho' ky' te^n va` ghi ddia chi hoac ten thanh pho va` quoc gia qu'y vi ddang cu* ngu o? cuo^'i thu. vanthuan@justpeace.va, tgmhue@dng.vnn.vn, tgmsg@telnet.com.vn, antnnson@hcm.vnn.vn, gmhh@hn.vnn.vn, tgmdl@hcm.vnn.vn, chinhtoa@dng.vnn.vn, tgmlx@hcm.vnn.vn, vductuan@hcm.vnn.vn, bvdoc@yahoo.com, dcvsaobien@dng.vnn.vn, dinhtu@hcm.vnn.vn, tgmqnhon@dng.vnn.vn, ntct.qn@dng.vnn.vn, tgmth@hn.vnn.vn, lsn89@hotmail.com, thaiduonganh@hn.vnn.vn, gmtram@vietcatholic.net, tgmxadoai@hn.vnn.vn, lantram@hcm.vnn.vn, ntctbmt@dng.vnn.vn, andrephu.tgm@hcm.vnn.vn, veritas@mnl.sequel.net, fn021777@mail.flashnet.it, tran.van@flashnet.it, domluong@earthlink.net Ki'nh Gu+?i: Ho^.i D-o^`ng Gia'm Mu.c Vie^.t Nam 40 Pho^' Nha` Chung Ha` No^.i , Vie^.t Nam Ki'nh thu+a ca'c D-u+'c Gia'm Mu.c thuo^.c Gia'o Ho^.i Vie^.t Nam me^'n ye^u, Chu'ng con thuo^.c co^.ng d-o^`ng Da^n Chu'a ta.i ha?i ngoa.i, la` nhu+~ng ngu+\o+i suo^'t bao nhie^u na(m qua luo^n hu+o+'ng ve^` que^ nha` va` la('ng nghe tu+`ng nie^`m vui no^~i buo^`n cu?a gia'o ho^.i Me. Vie^.t Nam. Trong nhu+~ng nga`y qua, chu'ng con vu+`a vui mu+`ng vu+`a vo^ cu`ng lo la('ng khi nghe tin gia'o da^n Nguye^.t Bie^`u ma.nh da.n d-u+'ng le^n d-o`i la.i ta`i sa?n cu?a gia'o ho^.i va` d-o`i quye^`n tu+. do to^n gia'o. Chu'ng con hie^?u su+. nguy ki.ch cho nhu+~ng ngu+\o+i con Chu'a chi? co' co^~ tra`ng ha.t trong tay tru+o+'c nhu+~ng ke? vo^ tha^`n hung ha~n la(m la(m tay su'ng tay dao\. Va` cu~ng chi'nh vi` va^.y ma` chu'ng con la.i ca`ng ki'nh phu.c su+. can d-a?m vo^ cu`ng cu?a ca'c pha^`n tha^n the^? Chu'a Kito^ na`y. D-a^y d-u'ng la` su+. can d-a?m theo gu+o+ng To^? Phu. Maisen do~ng da.c d-o`i Pharao^ pha?i ca('t xie^`ng xi'ch no^ le^. Da^n Chu'a. D-a^y la` su+. can d-a?m theo cha^n cu?a chi'nh Chu'a Gie^ Su khi Ngu+\o+i do~ng da.c va.ch tra^`n su+. gia? do^'i cu?a ca? he^. tho^'ng gia'o quye^`n Do Tha'i d-ang da^~n Da^n Chu'a va`o d-u+\o+ng la^`m la.c du` pha?i tra? gia' ba(`ng Tha^.p Tu+. tre^n Nu'i So.. Va` d-a^y cu~ng la` su+. can d-a?m theo bu+o+'c ca'c Tha'nh Tu+? D-a.o Vie^.t Nam, nhu+~ng ngu+\o+i do~ng da.c tu+` cho^'i ca'c con d-u+\o+ng cho^'i d-a.o ye^n a^'m ma` hy sinh ma'u mi`nh d-e^? lu+u truye^`n la.i Gia'o Ho^.i Co^ng Gia'o Vie^.t Nam nga`y nay. Ki'nh thu+a Ho^.i D-o^`ng Gia'm Mu.c, Trong Na(m Tha'nh 2000 na`y, chi'nh D-u+'c Tha'nh Cha Joan Phaolo^ D-e^.n Nhi. d-a~ ch! i'nh thu+'c le^n tie^'ng xin lo^~i anh chi. em Do Tha'i va` nha^.n lo^~i cu?a Gia'o Ho^.i d-a~ no+~ im tie^'ng tru+o+'c ba`n tay die^.t chu?ng cu?a D-u+'c Quo^'c Xa~ trong the^' chie^'n hai\. Ha(?n la` trong tho+i gian d-o', ca'c vi. la~nh d-a.o Gia'o Ho^.i d-a~ cho tha'i d-o^. im la(.ng la` kho^n ngoan d-e^? co' the^? ha`nh d-a.o de^~ da`ng va` giu'p d-o+~ ca'c na.n nha^n trong im la(.ng. Tuy nhie^n, D-u+'c Tha'nh Cha Joan Phaolo^ I\I d-a~ chi? ro~ d-o' la` loa.i kho^n ngoan cu?a con ngu+\o+i the^' tra^`n chu+' kho^ng pha?i cu?a con ca'i Thie^n Chu'a\. Tha^.t the^', to^? phu. Maisen d-a~ kho^ng ba?o da^n Do Tha'i ho+.p ta'c vo+'i Pharao^ cho d-\o+i d-o+~ kho^?\. Chu'a Gie^ Su d-a~ kho^ng giu+~ im la(.ng tru+o+'c ca'c tha`y Lua^.t Si~ d-e^? co' the^m tho+i gi\o+ thie^'t la^.p gia'o ho^.i cho vu+~ng cha('c. Ca'c Tha'nh Tu+? D-a.o Vie^.t Nam d-a~ kho^ng gia? bo^. cho^'i Chu'a d-e^? a^m tha^`m pha't trie^?n co^.ng d-o^`ng gia'o da^n. Theo lo+i gia?ng da^.y cu?a D-u+'c Tha'nh Cha, chu'ng con tin vie^.c d-o`i ho?i cu?a ca'c con ca'i Chu'a ta.i gia'o xu+' Nguye^.t Bie^`u la` chi'nh d-a'ng kho^ng nhu+~ng theo lu+o+ng ta^m ngu+\o+i d-\o+i ma` ca? theo lu+o+ng ta^m, tra'ch nhie^.m cu?a ngu+\o+i Kito^ hu+~u\. Chu'ng con cu~ng tu+. nha^.n pha?i he^'t lo`ng u?ng ho^. va` va^.n d-o^.ng Da^n Chu'a tre^n kha('p the^' gio+'i u?ng ho^. gia'o xu+' Nguye^.t Bie^`u\. Mo^.t khi ta`i sa?n Gia'o Ho^.i va` tu+. do to^n gia'o co' d-u+\o+.c ta.i Nguye^.t Bie^`u thi` ta`i sa?n Gia'o Ho^.i va` tu+. do to^n gia'o tre^n kha('p nu+o+'c Vie^.t Nam co' nhie^`u hy vo.ng d-u+o+.c phu.c ho^`i. Chu'ng con la`m vie^.c na`y vi` d-o' la` bo^?n pha^.n chu+' kho^ng chi? la` mo^.t vie^.c la`m nha^n d-a.o bi`nh thu+o+`ng. Gia'o Ho^.i Co^ng Gia'o Vie^.t Nam kho^ng the^? cu+' d-u+'ng ma~i be^n le^` li.ch su+?\. Nhu+ng quan tro.ng ho+n he^'t, chu'ng con kho^ng muo^'n nghe tie^'ng Chu'a Gie^ Su than va~n trong nga`y pha'n xe't: "Ta d-o'! i kha't ca'c con kho^ng cho Ta a(n. Ta tra^`n truo^`ng ca'c con kho^ng cho Ta ma(.c. Ta bi. tu` to^.i ca'c con kho^ng tha(m vie^'ng", va` ra^'t co' the^? "Ta bi. ba'ch ha.i nhu+ng ca'c con va^~n giu+~ im la(.ng". Vo+'i ta^'t ca? lo`ng ki'nh tro.ng tuye^.t d-o^'i, chu'ng con tha thie^'t mong mo?i Ho^.i D-o^`ng Gia'm Mu.c Vie^.t Nam se~ chi'nh thu+'c le^n tie^'ng ve^` nhu+~ng d-o`i ho?i d-u'ng d-a'ng va` can d-a?m cu?a ca'c con ca'i Chu'a ta.i Nguye^.t Bie^`u. Chu'ng con tin tu+o+?ng lo+i no'i cu?a Ho^.i D-o^`ng Gia'm Mu.c kho^ng nhu+~ng la` lo+i khi'ch le^. vo^ cu`ng lo+'n lao cho gia'o xu+' Nguye^.t Bie^`u ma` co`n la` su+. kha(?ng d-i.nh Gia'o Ho^.i Co^ng Gia'o Vie^.t Nam la` Gia'o Ho^.i cu?a Chu'a Kito^, cu?a To^? phu. Maisen, cu?a ca'c Tha'nh Tu+? D-a.o Vie^.t Nam, va` cu?a D-u+'c Gia'o Hoa`ng Joan Phaolo^ D-e^. Nhi.. Chu'ng con ha(`ng ca^`u nguye^.n o+n soi sa'ng va` quan pho`ng cu?a Thie^n Chu'a xuo^'ng tre^n Gia'o Ho^.i Vie^.t Nam, Ho^.i D-o^`ng Gia'm Mu.c Vie^.t Nam, va` gia'o xu+' Nguye^.t Bie^`u me^'n ye^u. Ha?i ngoa.i nga`y 22 tha'ng 12 na(m 2000, Chu'ng con cu`ng ky' te^n,
121	Date: 2001-01-06 11:08:41 Fuck this site ( no email / no homepage) wrote: F U C K ! F U C K ! ======o ( )( ) You're My Penis !!! Ha ha ha ha !
120	Date: 2001-01-06 10:59:46 Bac Ho ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Nay cac chau. Bac co vai loi muon noi. Truoc kia, cha me cac chau, nhung nguoi bi My, Nguy lam mo mat da quay sung ban vao dong bao minh. Ngay nay, cac chau da thay ro ban chat cua cuon chien tranh Bac-Nam, da thay ro bo mat that cua My thi tai sao cac chau lai co hanh dong qua khich, chia re moi doan ket dan toc ? Cac chau cu thu huong ve To Quoc Viet Nam voi mot trai tim, mot tam long ma xem, khong co mot nguoi nao o Viet Nam thu ghet cac chau dau. Ho luon luon mo rong vong tay chao don cac chau tro ve Que Huong. Hay nghe loi bac, neu co co hoi, cac chau hay ve Viet Nam de thay Dat Nuoc ta ngay cang giau manh, van minh hon rat nhieu roi. Do la do Dang, Cach Mang va quan chung Nhan Dan dong long xay dung To Quoc. Cac chau khong nen lam loi nua. Bac rat mong co ngay cac chau hoi tam...
119	Date: 2001-01-06 10:51:38 Patriot ( patriot@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Hoi nhung ten phan dong ngu si kia ! Cai Viet Nam Cong Hoa cua cac nguoi da bi Dang, Cach Mang danh duoi tu nam 1975 roi. Da hon 25 nam ma cac nguoi van con ngu muoi. Chang thay nuoc Cong Hoa Xa Hoi Chu Nghia Viet Nam dang ngay cang vung manh sao ? Cac nguoi cu ho hao, cu pha dam cung chang ich gi. Dang Cong San Muon Nam ! CHXHCN Viet Nam Muon Nam ! Bac Ho Vi Dai !!!
118	Date: 2001-01-04 22:34:56 Loi Doan ( webmaster@vn-pro.com / http://www.vn-pro.com) wrote: CD,VCD, and DVD for sales
117	Date: 2001-01-04 14:57:26 Ho Phuong ( no email / no homepage) wrote: To #109 : VNCH khong bao gio chet, chi co Xa Hoi Chu Nghia Vietnam(tuc la CSVN) se chet theo trao luu cua CS the gioi. VNCH van song va se song mai mai doi doi de tranh dau cho Tu Do Dan Chu cua que huong Viet Nam. Nguoi #109 hay nhin mat ngoi cho dang CSVN tu tieu diet, vi khong co chinh nghia. Lam gi con chu thuyet Cong san Marx, Lenine... tren the gioi nay nua ma bam viu. VNCH mai mai muon nam de thay the CSVN rat gan day. #109 chuan bi "hoi chanh" thi vua.
116	Date: 2000-12-22 05:29:19 VN ( no email / no homepage) wrote: LM Nguye^~n Va(n Ly' tuye^.t thu+.c Repost www.lmvntd.org/presse/0012mlnvly_net.htm LM Nguye^~n Va(n Ly' tuye^.t thu+.c vo^ tho+`i ha.n d-e^? d-o`i quye^`n tu+. do to^n gia'o "Ha~y d-e^? d-u+o+.c tu+. do d-i te^' le^~ Thie^n Chu'a... Ta truye^`n cho con d-ie^`u gi` con pha?i no'i..., d-u+`ng so+. chi ca?..." Tre^n d-a^y la` nhu+~ng lo+`i nha('n nhu? cu?a LM Nguye^n Va(n Ly' trong ba?n Tuye^n Ngo^n d-u+o+.c pho^? bie^'n kha('p no+i nga`y 22/11 vu+`a qua. LM Nguye^~n Va(n Ly', thuo^.c Gia'o Xu+' Nguye^.t Bie^`u d-a~ gu+?i d-i, ba?n Tuye^n Ngo^n na`y go^`m 10 d-ie^?m d-e^? to^' ca'o ti`nh tra.ng ti.ch thu d-a^'t d-ai cu?a ca'c gia'o pha^.n o+? Hue^', nha^'t la` ti`nh tra.ng kie^?m soa't sinh hoa.t cu?a gia'o ho^.i Co^ng Gia'o ta.i Vie^.t Nam, d-a(.c bie^.t la` ca'c gia'o pha^.n o+? Hue^'. Sau na(m 1975, Gia'o Xu+' Nguye^.t Bie^`u d-a~ bi. Ho+.p Ta'c Xa~ No^ng Nghie^.p tru+ng thu 10.000 m2 ruo^.ng va` 5000 m2 d-a^'t kho^, trong d-o' co' 1905 m2 na(`m trong khuo^n vie^n nha` tho+`. Theo Nghi. Quye^'t 297/CP ban ha`nh nga`y 11/11/1997 cu?a chi'nh quye^`n, Ho+.p Ta'c Xa~ pha?i d-e^? la.i cho nha` tho+` toa`n bo^. 1905m2 na`y co^.ng vo+'i tu+` 3000 - 5000 m2 ruo^.ng, nhu+ng tre^n thu+.c te^' Ho+.p Ta'c Xa~ chi? d-e^? la.i 250m2 ruo^.ng va` 250m2 ma(.t ao ma` tho^i. D-a~ the^', co`n chie^'m du.ng ho+n 200m2 d-a^'t khuo^n vie^n nha` tho+` d-e^? la`m mu+o+ng thu?y lo+.i. Sau nhie^`u la^`n khie^'u kie^.n ye^u ca^`u chi'nh quye^`n d-i.a phu+o+ng cu+'u xe't la.i vie^.c na`y ma` chi'nh quye^`n va^~n kho^ng cu+'u xe't, ca'c gia'o da^n Nguye^.t Bie^`u d-a~ quye^'t d-i.nh xa^y mu+o+ng thu?y lo+.i na`y vo`ng theo khuo^n vie^n nha` tho+` d-e^? la^'y d-a^'t tro^`ng tro.t kie^'m the^m nguo^`n lo+.i cho Gia'o Xu+' hoa.t d-o^.ng. Tu+` chie^`u nga`y 16 d-e^'n 20 tha'ng 11, co^ng an d-a~ d-e^'n nga(n ca?n kho^ng cho gia'o da^n mang xe cho+? d-a^'t d-e^'n thu+.c hie^.n co^ng tri`nh na`y, la^'y mo.i ly' do d-e^? nga(n ca?n. Nhu+ng ca'c gia'o da^n mo^.t lo`ng cu+o+ng quye^'t, tie^'p tu.c khai mu+o+ng va` la`m d-a^'t d-e^? ki.p gieo tro^`ng tre^n thu+?a d-a^'t na`y. Nga`y 4/12, gia'o da^n Nguye^.t Bie^`u d-a~ mang ca'c ta^'m ba?ng vie^'t chu+~ tha^.t to "Chu'ng to^i ca^`n tu+. do" ca('m xuo^'ng ruo^.ng va` ba('t d-a^`u gieo tro^`ng. Co^ng an d-e^'n la`m a'p lu+.c, ha.ch xa'ch LM Nguye^~n Va(n Ly', do+? hai ta^'m ba?ng vu+'t xuo^'ng ho^`. Pha?n u+'ng la.i nhu+~ng d-a`n a'p na`y, LM Nguye^~n Va(n Ly' d-a~ ba('t d-a^`u mo^.t cuo^.c tuye^.t thu+.c vo^ tho+`i ha.n sau khi gu+?i d-i Lo+`i Ke^u Go.i tho^'ng thie^'t ye^u ca^`u d-o^`ng ba`o trong va` ngoa`i nu+o+'c ha~y ti'ch cu+.c d-a^'u tranh cho quye^`n Tu+. Do To^n Gia'o ta.i Vie^.t Nam. Nguye^.t Bie^`u la` mo^.t gia'o xu+' ra^'t nho? va` nghe`o, qui tu. d-u+o+.c khoa?ng 150 gia'o hu+~u, la` ho. nha'nh cu?a Gia'o Xu+' Phu+o+`ng D-u'c o+? Hue^'. Chi'nh ta.i no+i d-a^y, LM Phe^ro^ Nguye^~n Hu+~u Gia?i, cu+.u gia'm d-o^'c Chu?ng Vie^.n Hoan Thie^.n (Hue^') d-a~ bi. qua?n che^' tu+` na(m 1987 d-e^'n na(m 1993. Sau d-o', LM Nguye^~n Va(n Ly' cu~ng bi. qua?n thu'c ta.i d-a^y tu+` na(m 1995 d-e^'n nay, sau khi bi. giam o+? Ha` No^.i ga^`n 10 na(m. LM Ly' la` cu+.u thu+ ky' cu?a D-u+'c To^?ng Gia'm Mu.c Philipphe^ Nguye^~n Kim D-ie^`n d-a~ che^'t vi` d-a.o nga`y 8/6/1988 ta.i Sa`i Go`n.
115	Date: 2000-12-03 05:16:17 PATTI ( no email / no homepage) wrote: I HAVE CAME HERE TO THIS SITE TO ASK THAT ANYONE KNOWING OF ANY OF OUR AMERICAN POW'S THERE IN VIET NAM, TO PLEASE TELL THEM, MANY OF US HERE IN THEIR HOMELAND IS PRAYING FOR THEIR RETURN TO US. MANY OF US HAVE NOT GIVEN UP HOPE, AND THEY ARE IN OUR PRAYERS DAILY. I BELIEVE AS MANY OTHERS DO, THAT THERE ARE THOSE STILL ALIVE IN VIET NAM AND WE WANT THEM RELEASED AND BROUGHT HOME. I AM ASHAMED THAT MORE EFFORT HAS NOT BEEN MADE FOR THEIR RELEASE. WE NEED MORE AND MORE IN THIS WORLD TO HAVE COMPASSION FOR ONE ANOTHER AND TILL MAN LEARNS THIS, THERE WILL ALWAYS BE TURMOIL. I PRAY THAT GOD WILL ANSWER MY PRAYER THROUGH THIS EMAIL AND THAT SOMEHOW, SOMEWHERE, THAT MY WORDS HERE WILL HAVE MEANING TO YOU THERE IN VIET NAM AND TO PLEASE, ALSO ASK YOUR LEADER THERE, TO HELP FOR THIS CAUSE TO PLEASE RETURN ALL OUR MIA/POW'S HOME. THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS YOU. SINCERELY, PATTI
114	Date: 2000-11-25 23:26:27 Tong Bi Thu LKP ( toasoan@nhandan.org.vn / no homepage) wrote: To 109 Thang can bo ngu,ho.p Da?ng thi` no'i chuy�.n l�`n ddi~,ngo�i DDa?ng thi` gio)? gi.ong y�u nuoc gia? Ong se gu)?i cho m�`y ba?n Tu). Ki�?m.
113	Date: 2000-11-24 18:13:01 tough guy ( no email / no homepage) wrote: communist stink!!!!!!whoever replys to me i beat them up
112	Date: 2000-11-24 18:06:04 Daniel ( no email / no homepage) wrote: i dont like you dissin my grandpa
111	Date: 2000-11-20 20:28:36 anonymous coward ( no email / no homepage) wrote: to the communists: After Clinton visited to your country, Now, how do you call your uncle: uncle "Ho" or uncle "Bill" ?????
110	Date: 2000-11-19 15:48:12 Nguoi Vietnam ( no email / no homepage) wrote: RAT DUNG, dang cong san VN "forever" doi voi lu can bo tham o trong nuoc va voi lu con chau can bo dang phe phon hang ngay o Las Vegas. Hay hoi nguoi dan luong thien trong nuoc la dang cong san VN co xung dang de quang vinh khong?
109	Date: 2000-11-18 21:00:00 Nguoi Yeu Nuoc ( elof_hoa@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Day la mot website rat phan dong. Khong mang tinh chat xay dung dat nuoc Viet Nam cua chung ta. Hien tai khong con ton tai cai ma cac nguoi goi la Viet Nam Cong Hoa nua. Viet Nam Cong Hoa da bi tieu diet vao nam 1975.
108	Date: 2000-11-18 20:52:57 Nguoi Yeu Nuoc ( elof_hoa@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Dang Cong San Viet Nam quang vinh muon Nam Forever great Vietnam Communist Party
107	Date: 2000-11-16 15:54:05 Viet Cong ( hochiminh@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: This site suck
106	Date: 2000-11-01 01:23:08 Ly' Thu.y ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Vie^.t Co^.ng du. ba'n CamRanh dde^? tru+` no+. Washington, Moscow and Beijing Covet Vietnam�s Ports 0032 GMT, 000316 U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen�s visit to Vietnam, which ended March 15, is the latest in a flurry of diplomatic activity between Hanoi and officials from China, Russia and the United States. Given Vietnam's grim economic outlook, the sudden enthusiasm of these countries to strengthen relations seems rather unusual. But Vietnam does have one priceless asset. Its long coastline provides direct access to the South China Sea, the supply line to Northeast Asia. Vietnam has one of the few major naval bases directly on the sea. For the United States, control of these waters is the key to defending Taiwan, South Korea and Japan. Neither China nor the United States has a military presence in Vietnam. Only Russia has access to a Vietnamese base. The Russian navy leases facilities at Cam Ranh Bay, once the center of U.S. military power in the country, near the southern tip of Vietnam. The lease will expire in 2004, and Russia has been involved in tense negotiations with Vietnam to extend it. During the 1980s, the bay was Russia's largest overseas naval base, although it has since scaled back its presence. The United States would also like to have access to Vietnam�s ports and military bases. As U.S. influence in Southeast Asia diminishes � particularly in Thailand and Indonesia � the United States is shifting its attention to the South China Sea. Vietnam offers one of the only major bases in this region. Singapore continues to be willing to harbor U.S. ships, but the city-state is not located on the South China Sea. Until the mid-1990s, the United States maintained a base in Subic Bay in the Philippines; now the United States has begun to court Manila again. Besides Vietnam and the Philippines, the northern coast of Malaysian-controlled Borneo provides the only direct port access. But Malaysia�s government is unlikely to welcome U.S. warships in its ports. Moreover, its existing facilities can't compare to Cam Ranh Bay. Because of its key location, the United States, Russia and China are all courting Vietnam, which will use this popularity to its advantage. From the United States and China, Vietnam will seek trade and investment bonuses. China may soon take a more conciliatory stance toward Vietnam regarding disputed territory in the Spratly Islands. Vietnam ultimately may have the most to gain from Russia, its ideological big brother during the Cold War. Hanoi has discussed with Moscow the possibility of Russia forgiving billions of dollars of debt in exchange for continued use of the Cam Ranh Bay base, according to Deutsche Presse-Agentur. Although the cash-starved Russian government has so far refused to budge, competition for the base could provide the necessary incentive. Speaking to reporters after his talks, Cohen himself alluded to the one vital U.S. interest in Vietnam. He said he "foresaw a day when U.S. warships will call on Vietnam's ports," reported Agence France-Presse. In the upcoming months, the three countries' competition for influence in Vietnam will likely intensify. www.stratfor.com/asia/com...160034.htm
105	Date: 2000-10-29 02:27:29 TAN KHOA TRUONG ( tankhoa@aol.com / no homepage) wrote: RE: VNCH cha`o co` quo^'c ky`. DE^"? NA^NG CAO TINH THA^`N YE^U NUO'C VA` VINH DANH LA' CO` TO^? QUO^'C VNCH CU?A CHU'NG TA. HO?I: TO^I CO' THE^? TI`M BA`I CA CHA`O CO` VNCH TRONG DA.NG "WAV" O? -DA^U KHO^NG ? ..XIN VUI LO`NG CHOI BIE^'T GA('P !!! VI` TO^I MUO^'N INSTALL BA`I CA MO^~I KHI MA'Y PC TURN ON. CA'M O*N NHIE^`U.
104	Date: 2000-10-20 09:19:46 Satcong ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
103	Date: 2000-10-09 17:40:08 Da^n DDen ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Nha` Va(n Du+o+ng Thu Hu+o+ng ddo`i tu+ ba?n ddo? bo? tie^`n cu+'u lu.t Du+o+'i dda^y la` cuo^.c pho?ng va^'n dda(.c bie^.t cu?a Kicon.com tu+` Nam Cali vo+'i nha` va(n Du+o+ng Thu Hu+o+ng ta.i Ha` No^.i ve^` ti`nh hi`nh cu+'u tro+. na.n lu.t, trong ddo' nha` va(n ba^'t ddo^`ng chi'nh kie^'n no^?i tie^'ng na`y dda~ ca'o buo^.c ca'c la~nh tu. CSVN chi? lo ke^u go.i da^n nghe`o quye^n go'p trong khi kho^ng ai xin ca'c tay tham nhu~ng go^.c - nhu+ Vo~ Va(n Kie^.t co' tin tu+` Ha` No^.i la` dda~ tham nhu~ng 500 trie^.u ddo^, hay Le^ DDu+'c Anh vo+'i 200 trie^.u ddo^ - nha? bo+'t tie^`n ra cu+'u tro+.. Pho?ng va^'n nhu+ sau. Nha` va(n Du+o+ng Thu Hu+o+ng: "Che^' ddo^. ddo^.c dda?ng chi? co' lo+.i cho gio+'i ca^`m quye^`n. Co`n ngu+o+`i da^n ua^'t ho^.c ma'u mo^`m ma` ta^'t ca? dde^`u pha?i ca^m la(.ng. -Kicon: Lu~ lu.t ddang hoa`ng ha`nh ta.i ca'c ti?nh vu`ng ddo^`ng ba(`ng so^ng Cu+?u Long khie^'n nhie^`u ngu+o+`i bi. thie^.t ma.ng va` ha`ng tra(m nga`n ngu+o+`i la^m va`o ca?nh ma`n tro+`i chie^'u dda^'t. DDo^`ng ba`o mi`nh ngoa`i Ba('c co' no^~ lu+.c na`o nha(`m cu+'u tro+. ruo^.t thi.t trong Nam kho^ng a.? -Nha` va(n Du+o+ng Thu Hu+o+ng: Tru+o+'c tie^n to^i pha?i no'i nga`y ra(`ng, ma^'y na(m nay, ti`nh hi`nh lu~ lu.t ra^'t nhie^`u chu+' kho^ng pha?i ba^y gio+` mo+'i xa^?y ra. DDie^`u na`y cha('c ddo^`ng ba`o mi`nh o+? ha?i ngoa.i cu~ng dda~ bie^'t. Trong ma^'y na(m ga^`n dda^y, Vie^.t Nam cu~ng nhu+ nhie^`u nu+o+'c kha'c tre^n the^' gio+'i bi. thie^n tai lie^n tu.c. DDo+`i so^'ng kinh te^' cu?a ngu+o+`i da^n dda~ nghe`o kho^? la.i co`n bi. thie^n tai lu~ lu.t ne^n ca`ng ro+i va`o ti`nh tra.ng tra^`m kha ho+n. Cu~ng nhu+ nhu+~ng na(m tru+o+'c khi xa^?y ra thie^n tai o+? Hue^', o+? Ca` Mau, la^`n na`y, ta^'t ca? ca'c khu pho^' o+? Ha` No^.i ddang quye^n go'p dde^? cu+'u tro+. ddo^`ng ba`o. O+? ca'c khu pho^', ta^'t ca? ca'c to^? tru+o+?ng dde^`u ddi dde^'n tu+`ng nha` dde^? quye^n go'p. Khu to^i o+? la` mo^.t khu ta^.p the^?. To^i va^~n thu+o+`ng no'i ddu`a la` to^i va^~n o+? khu Harlem, tu+'c la` khu ngu+o+`i nghe`o. Nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i chung quanh to^i la` nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i ca'n bo! ^. bi`nh thu+o+`ng, nhu+~ng ba` ca^'p du+o+~ng, hoa(.c nhu+~ng ba` giu+~ tre?, nhu+~ng ca'n bo^. tha^'p, tu+'c la` nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i ca'n bo^. xoa`ng xi~nh, lu+o+ng ho. chi? co' tu+` ho+n 200 dde^'n 300 nga`n(tu+'c khoa?ng 20 ddo^ My~) mo^.t tha'ng. Va^.y ma` ho. va^~n cu+' ddo'ng tie^`n cu+'u tro+.. To^i tha^'y ra(`ng nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i na`y, du` ba?n tha^n ho. ra^'t kho^?, nhu+ng ho. ra^'t thu+o+ng ddo^`ng ba`o, ho. va^~n ddo'ng go'p giu'p ddo^`ng ba`o trong khi nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i la~nh dda.o a(n ca('p cu?a da^n ha`ng ma^'y tra(m trie^.u My~ kim thi` ta.i sao kho^ng "no^n" ra cho da^n, nhu+ o^ng DDo^~ Mu+o+`i dda~ tu+`ng "no^n" ra cho tre? ta`n ta^.t. Co' nhie^`u ngu+o+`i no'i vo+'i to^i ra(`ng ta.i sao cu+' quye^n go'p ma~i o+? nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i nghe`o kho' nhu+ the^', trong khi thu+.c te^' la` o+? nu+o+'c na`y, co' ra^'t nhie^`u ngu+o+`i ma(.c qua^`n ho^`ng, nghi~a la` nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i thuo^.c giai ca^'p tu+ sa?n ddo?. To^i nho+' ca'ch dda^y va`i na(m co' nhu+~ng cuo^.c bie^?u ti`nh lie^n tu.c cu?a nhu+~ng ca'n bo^. ve^` hu+u nha(`m ye^u ca^`u dda?ng co^.ng sa?n pha?i tra? lo+`i ve^` va^'n dde^` o^ng cu+.u To^?ng bi' thu+ DDo^~ Mu+o+`i dda~ "no^n" ra 1 trie^.u ddo^. Xin lo^~i, danh tu+` "no^n" ra co' nghi~a la` a(n va`o thi` pha?i no^n ra. The^' thi` o^ng DDo^~ Mu+o+`i co' u?ng ho^. tre? em ta`n ta^.t 1 trie^.u My~ kim. Vu. vie^.c na`y khie^'n ca'c cu. ca'n bo^. la~o tha`nh ra^'t ua^'t u+'c va` ddi bie^?u ti`nh ma^'y cuo^.c co^ng khai, vi` ho. tha('c ma('c ra(`ng, ta.i sao lu+o+ng o^ng DDo^~ Mu+o+`i cu~ng nhu+ lu+o+ng cu?a ca'c nha` la~nh dda.o nu+o+'c na`y, du` co' dde^? da`nh ca? ddo+`i cu~ng kho^ng dde^? da`nh ddu+o+.c ! 1 trie^.u ddo^. The^' thi` so^' tie^`n 1 trie^.u ddo^ ma` o^ng DDo^~ Mu+o+`i cho tre? ta`n ta^.t o^ng a^'y a(n ca('p o+? dda^u ra? To^i xin no'i, cho ra(`ng o^ng DDo^~ Mu+o+`i a(n ca('p 10 trie^.u DDo^ hoa(.c 20 trie^.u ddo^, thi` so^' tie^`n a(n ca('p na`y va^~n co`n ra^'t i't, ra^'t i't so vo+'i ngu+o+`i cu`ng tho+`i vo+'i o^ng a^'y. Ty? nhu+ o^ng Vo~ Va(n Kie^.t, o^ng Phan Va(n Kha?i cha(?ng ha.n. Ro^`i anh em o^ng Le^ DDu+'c Tho. nu+~a. Mo.i ngu+o+`i dde^`u bie^'t ta^'t ca? nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i na`y na(`m trong danh sa'ch 26 mafia Vie^.t Nam co' tie^`n go+?i ta.i ca'c nha` ba(ng lo+'n tre^n the^' gio+'i. Danh sa'ch ddo' thi` nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i no^ng da^n kho^ng bie^'t, chu+' trong Ha` No^.i thi` ngu+o+`i da^n dda~ ddo^`n tho^?i va` ngu+o+`i ta dda~ lie^.t ke^ tu+` A dde^'n Z. Nhu+~ng du+ lua^.n thi` kho^ng chi'nh xa'c 100%, nhu+ng to^i bie^'t cha('c la` ga^`n dda^y, ta^'t ca? nhu+~ng cu. la~o tha`nh ca'ch ma.ng dde^`u xo^n xao ve^` vu. Ban Cha^'p Ha`nh Trung U+o+ng DDa?ng Co^.ng Sa?n Vie^.t Nam ye^u ca^`u o^ng Vo~ Va(n Kie^.t va` o^ng Le^ DDu+'c Anh pha?i kie^?m ddie^?m ve^` va^'n dde^` tham nhu~ng. Nghe dda^u la` o^ng Vo~ Va(n Kie^.t tham nhu~ng 500 trie^.u ddo^ la co`n o^ng Le^ DDu+'c Anh la` 200 hoa(.c la` 250 trie^.u, hoa(.c la` 120 trie^.u ddo^ la. Ca? hai o^ng na`y dde^`u no'i ra(`ng la` kho^ng tie^'p tu.c kie^?m ddie^?m vi` ne^'u kie^?m ddie^?m nu+~a thi` ca'c o^ng a^'y se~ ddu+'t ma.ch ma'u na~o ma` che^'t.! Nhu+~ng chuye^.n loa.i tie^'u la^m chi'nh tri. na`y hie^.n ddang la`n tra`n ta.i ta^'t ca? ca'c qua'n nu+o+'c, ta^'t ca? ca'c qua'n ca` phe^. Bi`nh thu+o+ng thi` loa.i chuye^.n na`y co' the^? khie^'n ngu+o+`i ta cu+o+`i ddu+o+.c. Nhu+ng trong lu'c hie^.n nay, mo^.t nu+?a nu+o+'c ddang bi. lu~ lu.t, kho^ng nhu+~ng o+? ddo^`ng ba(`ng Nam bo^., ma` ca? mie^`n Trung va` Ta^y Ba('c nu+~a va` so^' a(n ma`y tra`n ve^` Ha` No^.i ra^'t la` nhie^`u thi` ca'i ca^u chuye^.n tie^'u la^m chi'nh tri. ma` hai o^ng Vo~ Va(n Kie^.t va` Le^ DDu+'c Anh do.a ddu+'t ma.ch ma'u na~o ddo' kho^ng la`m ngu+o+`i da^n cu+o+`i ma` khie^'n ngu+o+`i ta chu+?i. To^i chi? dda(.t mo^.t ca^u ho?i la` ta.i sao ma` nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i la~nh dda.o o+? Vie^.t Nam la.i khinh xua^'t dde^'n the^'. Ca'c o^ng nghi~ ra(`ng da^n chu'ng kho^ng bie^'t gi` ve^` ha`nh vi cu?a ca'c o^ng a^'y va` ta.i sao la.i cu+' bo`n ru't cu?a nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i da^n kho^ng ddu? a(n. DDa^y la` va^'n dde^` nha^n quye^`n cu?a Vie^.t Nam. Ta^'t ca? nhu+~ng vu. a(n ca('p ddo' da^n chu'ng ai cu~ng bie^'t, nhu+ng kho^ng ai no'i to+'i. Ba'o chi' o+? Vie^.t Nam ba^y gio+` la` ba'o chi' cu?a dda?ng co^.ng sa?n, pha't thanh cu~ng cu?a dda?ng, ti vi cu~ng cu?a dda?ng. Ca'i che^' ddo^. ddo^.c dda?ng no' co' lo+.i cho gio+'i ca^`m quye^`n nhu+ the^' dda^'y. Ngu+o+`i da^n ua^'t ho^.c ma'u mo^`m ma` ta^'t ca? dde^`u pha?i ca^m la(.ng. Ba'o dda`i cu?a nha` nu+o+'c cu+' ra ra? suo^'t nga`y, kho^ng co`n chu't lie^m si? na`o. Tha`nh tri` cu?a che^' ddo^. ddo^.c dda?ng khie^'n da^n chu'ng kho^ng no'i ddu+o+.c nhu+~ng ua^'t u+'c cu?a ho., trong khi gio+'i la~nh dda.o thi` da ma(.t ho. ra^'t da^`y, tim ho. kho^ng he^` bie^'t rung ddo^.ng tru+o+'c no^~i cu`ng cu+.c cu?a ngu+o+`i da^n.
102	Date: 2000-10-07 18:03:49 Hoa`i Vie^.t ( no email / no homepage) wrote: HANOI, Oct 7 (Reuters) - Police in southern Vietnam detained a dissident Buddhist monk and a group of followers on Saturday to stop them making an independent aid distribution to Mekong Delta flood victims in defiance of a government ban. Penelope Faulkner of the Paris-based International Buddhist Information Bureau said Nobel Peace Prize nominee Thich Quang Do, deputy leader of the outlawed Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam (UBCV), was detained in An Giang province and was being held at a customs office. The worst floods for decades in the low-lying Delta have killed 298 people, including 226 children, and an official of the southern anti-flood committee told Reuters over 50,000 people are going hungry and 100,000 may run short of food. The government said earlier in the week that all aid to Mekong Delta flood victims was welcome but must be channelled via three state-affiliated organisations to ensure supplies are effectively and fairly distributed. Faulkner said Do and about 30 followers had started distributing aid parcels in Vinh Hoi Dong, a hamlet near the Cambodian border, in defiance of this ruling when police told them they were not allowed to distribute aid marked with UBCV labels. "They were detained in the morning. As far as we know no formal charges have been brought. But they have been banned from continuing the distribution." She said all 30 followers may have been detained, but a customs office official told Reuters only Do and four or five others were being held. He gave no more details and a Foreign Ministry spokesman said he had no information on the case. When 73-year-old Do, nominated for this year"s Nobel Peace Prize by a group of 30 U.S. Congressmen, attempted a similar aid mission in 1994 he was arrested and jailed for three-and-a-half years. He has said he is not afraid of arrest this time. PROTEST AHEAD OF CLINTON VISIT Do"s protest comes at a sensitive time for Vietnam"s communist rulers, who are preparing for a historic visit by U.S. President Bill Clinton in mid-November. Clinton, the first U.S. president to visit Vietnam since the Vietnam War, is expected to raise the issue of human rights, including the treatment of unrecognised religious groups. Just last month, Vietnam jailed five members of the Hoa Hao Buddhist sect for one to three years for abusing democratic rights and slandering the government. Their church said they had complained of abuses of power by provincial authorities. Faulkner said the police had told Do he could distribute the parcels if he removed the labels, but he had refused to do this. The police were now waiting for instructions from higher up. Do had planned to make the trip with 50 followers but all but 12 had been intercepted before leaving their monasteries. The Buddhist Information Bureau said police stopped 17 of Do"s followers from distributing $22,000 of aid last month. The International Red Cross said on Friday it was rushing to get further emergency rice supplies to the Delta and would start a big rice handout next week. Do has spent more than 20 years in detention or in prison for his campaigns for religious freedom and greater democracy and before his latest detention said he was living under "indirect" restriction at his heavily policed monastery in Ho Chi Minh City. Faulkner said Do"s campaign was driven by his belief that Buddhists should take an active part in welfare programmes. The UBCV was effectively outlawed when the government authorised a single pro-government Buddhist church in 1981. Before leaving for his trip on Friday, Do had not left his monastery, except for monthly medical checkups, since March 1999, when he went to visit UBCV patriarch Thich Huyen Quang, who has been under pagoda arrest in central Vietnam since 1981. Police escorted him back to his monastery that time after two-and-a-half days. o0o
101	Date: 2000-10-06 17:23:40 Tuan ( no email / no homepage) wrote: HO+~I NHA^N LOA.I NGHE CHA(NG LO+`I CA^`U CU+'U Ho+~i nha^n loa.i, co' nghe kia`, tie^'ng the't Tu+` An Giang trong phie^n xu+? ti'n ddo^` Vo+'i to^.i danh lo+.i du.ng chu+~ tu+. do To^.i vu kho^'ng va` la.m quye^`n da^n chu? Da^n co' quye^`n chi ? xin ddu+`ng ru ngu? Ne^'u co' quye^`n sao bi. ba('t, bi. giam Ne^'u co' quye^`n sao kho^ng ddu+o+.c kho'i nhang Kho^ng ddu+o+.c so^'ng cho ddie^`u mi`nh ti'n ngu+o+~ng ? Da^n co' quye^`n ta.i sao da^n cha(?ng ddu+o+.c Tha(?ng tha('n tri`nh ba`y nguye^.n vo.ng ngu+o+`i da^n ? Ke? tu ha`nh sao pha?i tu+. thie^u tha^n ? Sao ti'n dda.o pha?i oan ti`nh, mo^? bu.ng ? Da^n co' quye^`n sao ngu+o+`i da^n pha^~n u+'c ? Ta.i sao da^n tuye^.t thu+.c o+? trong tu` ? Da^n co' quye^`n va` da^n co' tu+. do Sao bi. ba('t, bi. tha(?ng tay dda`n a'p ? Ho+~i nha^n loa.i nhi`n xem da^n ca'c nu+o+'c Co' tu+. do, da^n chu?, co' nha^n quye^`n Ho. tu+. thie^u ? mo^? bu.ng ? chi.u oan khie^n ? Va` ho. pha?i hy sinh ba(`ng no^~i che^'t ? The^' ma` o+? nu+o+'c to^i, ngu+o+`i da^n Vie^.t Pha?i tu+. thie^u, mo^? bu.ng bo+?i vi` sao ??? To^i no'i muo^n ca^u kho^ng he^'t nghe.n nga`o Kho^ng ta? he^'t ddau thu+o+ng vi` Co^.ng Sa?n Na`y ho+~i Lu+o+ng ta^m, Co^ng bi`nh, Nha^n ba?n Co' nghe cha(ng lo+`i ca^`u cu+'u da^n to^i ? Ho+~i nhu+~ng va(n minh tie^'n bo^. loa`i ngu+o+`i Ha~y ru+.c ro+~ cho lu.n ta`n a'c ddo^.c! N M H
100	Date: 2000-10-05 20:24:08 To^'t DDen ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Hay!!!!!! Nhu+~ng di ti'ch cu?a "Quo^'c ca va` Ba'c Ho^` muo^n na(m" dde^? la.i o+? dda^y ddu? chu+'ng minh ra(`ng thi` la` ca'i ma` go.i la` "DDa.o ddu+'c ca'ch ma.ng" cu?a ca'c ddi?nh cao tri' tu.e^ chi? la` mo^.t mo+' nhu+~ng ca^u ba^?n lo^~ tai . Thi` ra nhu+~ng pha^`n tu+? hoa.t ddo^.ng "Ngoa.i za^.n" cu?a ba'c chi? la` nhu+~ng loa.i nhu+ va^.y Ca'm o+n ca'c "DDo^`ng Cho'e" nha'
99	Date: 2000-10-04 05:56:03 Hoa`i Vie^.t ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Xin ddo^`ng y' vo+'i Ngu+o+`i Vie^.t Nam va` ne^'u ddu+o+.c , xin di.ch sang tie^'ng Anh, tie^'ng Pha'p dde^? Nhie^`u ngu+o+`i tha^'y ro~ su+. ba^?n thi?u cu?a ho. ho+n
98	Date: 2000-10-04 05:49:22 NguoiVietNam ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Ca'i cung ca'ch cu?a 98 chi? la`m ta(ng the^m ve? xa^'u xa va` su+. ke'm da.y ba?o ve^ tu+ ca'ch cu?a nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i co^.ng sa?n. Ho. dda~ tu+. to^' ca'o ho. Ba(`ng nhu+~ng lo+`i le~ ba^?n thi?u. Xin cu+' giu+~ la.i la`m ky? nie^.m va` gio+'i thie^.u cho mo.i ngu+o+`i bie^'t tu+o+`ng ta^.n su+. vo^ gia'o du.c cu?a ho. Ho. kho^ng xu+'ng dda'ng ddu+o+.c ddo^'i cha^'t hay tra? lo+`i vi` dda~ he^'t thuo^'c chu+~a Mo^.t la' co+` ddo? ma`u ma'u va` nhu+~ng lo+`i no'i tho^ tu.c ddi ddo^i vo+'i nhau kho^ng the^? la` mo^.t mo^.t hi`nh a?nh to^'t ddu+o+.c
97	Date: 2000-10-03 23:34:46 Quoc Ca ( khoviyeu99@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote:
96	Date: 2000-10-03 23:14:50 Ba'c Ho^` Muo^n Na(m ( tam1700@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Dde^? tao da.y cho tu.i ma`y bie^'t nhe'..tui. may` chi? l` con bo` ddu.c tho^i chu' kho^ng co' la`m dduoc. cai con ca(.t gi` he^'t chi? bie^'t no'i gio^'ng thoi..cai' bu' ca(t. cho Ba'c Ho^` ddi cai' ddo^` pha?n ddo^ng. chi? co' cai' mo`ng tho^i..co' gio?i cho^'ng co^.ng sa?n thi` ve^` vietnam ma` strike....chi? co' ca'i mie^.ng thuo^'i la to o? be^n na`y tho^i...tui cho' dde^? co^.ng ho`a na`y ddi bu' lo`n ddi, cai'i ddo^` ba.i tra^.n......Ba'c Ho^` la` Cha cu?a Co^.ng Ho`a...tui. ma`y ha?y nho' nhe'........Co^.ng Sa?n Muo^m Na(m Ba'c Ho^` Muo^n Na(m Nguoi` La` Cha cu?a la` la?nh Tu. Vi? Ddai. cu?a da^'t nuo'c Vietnam Co^.ng Sa?n Muo^m Na(m Ba'c Ho^` Muo^n Na(m Co^.ng Sa?n Muo^m Na(m Ba'c Ho^` Muo^n Na(m Co^.ng Sa?n Muo^m Na(m Ba'c Ho^` Muo^n Na(m Co^.ng Sa?n Muo^m Na(m Ba'c Ho^` Muo^n Na(m Co^.ng Sa?n Muo^m Na(m Ba'c Ho^` Muo^n Na(m Co^.ng Sa?n Muo^m Na(m Ba'c Ho^` Muo^n Na(m Nguoi` La` Cha cu?a la` la?nh Tu. Vi? Ddai. cu?a da^'t nuo'c Vietnam Nguoi` La` Cha cu?a la` la?nh Tu. Vi? Ddai. cu?a da^'t nuo'c Vietnam Nguoi` La` Cha cu?a la` la?nh Tu. Vi? Ddai. cu?a da^'t nuo'c Vietnam Nguoi` La` Cha cu?a la` la?nh Tu. Vi? Ddai. cu?a da^'t nuo'c Vietnam
95	Date: 2000-10-01 20:39:26 Ngu+o+`i lu+u vong ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Xin mo^.t va`i chia se? vo+'i so^' 90. Qua ca^u no'i cu?a ba.n thi` co' ve? nhu+ mo^.t ngu+o+`i ddu+'ng ngoa`i xem cho+i,. Kho^ng bie^'t to^i co' ne^n chia se? vo+'i ngu+o+`i kho^ng co' lo`ng hay kho^ng ? Bo+?i vi` "Vo^ tri ba^'t mo^." Tuy nhie^n hy vo.ng ba.n co' the^? hie^?u ne^'u tha^.t ti`nh muo^'n hie^?u. To^i muo^'n no'i dde^'n khi'a ca.nh ta^'m lo`ng. Thi' du. nhu+ ne^'u vi` lo`ng thu+o+ng ma` mo^.t ngu+o+`i me. tu+. ddan a'o cho con, nhu+ng ddu+'a con la.i che^ no' xa^'u qu'a kho^ng the`m ma(.c thi` ....gi'a tri. o+? ca'i a'o gia?m ddi hay gi'a tri. ddu+'a con gia?m ddi ? DDo^'i vo+'i Ba`i quo^'c ca va` la' co+`, chu'ng ta ne^n nhi`n du+o+'i khi'a ca.nh kha'c ho+n la` khi'a ca.nh gi'a tri. va^.t cha^'t. Ha~y nhi`n qua nhu+~ng ve^'t thu+o+ng cu?a da^n to^.c, nhu+~ng ba^'t co^ng ma` dde^'n ho^m nay ngu+o+`i da^n pha?i chi.u ddu+ng, ha~y nhi`n nhu+~ng ke? go.i la` chie^'n tha('ng ddang so^'ng ra sao, ho+n la` nhi`n nhu+~ng ho+n thua ba(`ng lo+`i le~. No' ta^`m thu+o+`ng, la`m gia?m gi'a tri. ngu+o+`i tha('c ma('c vo+' va^?n . Sau cu`ng, to^i chi? xin ne^u le^n mo^.t ddie^`u: "ke? na`o tu+. tu+` cho^'i mi`nh thi` ddu+`ng mong ngu+o+`i kha'c co^ng nha^.n" NGU+O+`I LU+U VONG
94	Date: 2000-10-01 00:18:21 Hoang Quoi ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Tra? lo+`i so^' 92 : Ne^'u ba.n kho^ng co^ng nha^.n chi'nh phu? VN hie^.n nay(CSVN), va` ddang o+? tre^n ca'c nu+o+'c Tu+. Do, thi` ba.n ddu+o+ng nhie^n pha?i cha`o va` ha't quo^'c ca cu?a VNCH. La' co+` na^`y hie^.n nay la` bie^?u tu+o+.ng cho mo^.t the^? che^' Tu+. Do Da^n Chu? cho Vie^.t Nam, ma` ca? co^.ng ddo^`ng ngu+o+`i Vie^.t quo^'c gia ddang tranh dda^'u dde^? la^.t ddo^? che^' ddo^. co^ng sa?n hie^.n nay.
93	Date: 2000-09-27 23:41:52 Phong ( ntphong@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Your site is great, and very instructive for us, the young. Phong, from France.
92	Date: 2000-09-27 18:35:47 Dan boatpeople Sau 75 tu mien Bac ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Toi muon hoi : doi voi nhung nguoi vuot bien sau nam 1975 tu mien bac, hien gio song o cac nuoc tu do, khong cong nhan che do hien nay o Vietnam thi` cha`o quoc ky` va` hat quoc ca gi` .? Cam on da doc !
91	Date: 2000-09-27 03:58:40 Hoang ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Neu mot ngay nguoi dan Viet Nam van con phai bo nuoc ra di de di tim tu do, chung ta phai cuong quyet dau tranh de danh chet lu~ cho' Co^.ng Sa?n, lu~ Qui? Do?, lu~ ban' nuoc. Chung toi la nhung nuoi sinh vien, hang mong duoc noi got Cha, Anh, mot long mot da quyet tam dau tranh cho mot Viet Nam Tu Do. Xin Cam On Uy Ban Bao Ve Quoc Ky Viet Nam Cong Hoa voi nhung viec quy vi da lam. Viet cho Lu Cho Cong San: Tui bay khong phai la loai nguoi. Tui bay la loai thu vat khong co cha, khong co me, khong co to tien giong noi. Tui bay da giet chet chinh nguoi than cu tui bay de tranh quyet cai tri. Chinh nghia se trung tri tui bay. Mot ngay nao do, tao se chat dau tat ca tui.
90	Date: 2000-09-26 21:51:00 Dan -Da.i Vie^.t ( DaiCoViet@vietnam.vn / http://DaiCoViet.vn) wrote: Quoc ky` thi` coi duoc, quoc ca thi` te? nha.t , ye^'u o'/t . O'anh nhau thua la` pha?i
89	Date: 2000-09-24 04:52:52 Pham Do Ky Chau ( ckpham@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Ca'm o'n ca'c anh chi, ra^'t nhie^`u. Ho^m nay du''a con ga'i to^i ho?i ve^` quo^'c ca cu?a VN. To^i va^~n nho'' nhu'ng muo^'n cho cha'u nghe tie^'ng nha.c. Ra^'t la` ca?m do^.ng khi tha^'y ca'i site na`y.
88	Date: 2000-09-10 20:01:30 Ron Evans ( panamas@gtcom.net / no homepage) wrote: I enjoyed your site very much. Keep up your good work! R.E. 5th Special Forces Group (Prov) 1st Special Forces (Abn) RVN 1964- 1966
87	Date: 2000-08-20 07:06:31 Richard Williams ( richmw@netzero.net / no homepage) wrote: Great works honoring those who sacrified for the Republic of Vietnam
86	Date: 2000-08-07 21:26:36 Jack Smith ( grh00@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: i was looking for the picture of the viet cong guerilla being executed by a north vietnamese, supposedly it is very famous. perhaps someone could help me out.
85	Date: 2000-07-31 13:15:51 Ariel Steiner ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Cool Language
84	Date: 2000-07-30 19:53:44 NguoiVietNam ( no email / no homepage) wrote: To 82: I Totally support your Idea: We must restore VNCH
83	Date: 2000-07-24 01:56:06 le tien lap ( lap-le@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: I cried of watching these pictures as well as my belove flag that I missed out for a long long time. Thank for remind me our heroics pass.Keep going.
82	Date: 2000-07-23 18:10:47 anonymous coward ( no email / no homepage) wrote: After 25 years, the VN Communist does not have any future at all. Same as China, Cuba, North Korea, VN communist did not bring any good to the ordinary people. But it cost those people a lot of humiliation, suffering, and innocent victims. The VN communist has already sufficiently proved the inability in its own political and economic system. It's a big trash. It's time to restore the Republic of Vietnam, I totally support this website. Thanks
81	Date: 2000-07-19 13:56:12 van khiem nguyen ( nguyen_van_khiem@hotmail.com / http://vietnam.qc.ca) wrote: Dear Sirs, I would like to have the vietnamese national anthem (version with lyrics) downloaded.I could not do that because you don ``t have that option.If you please, send us one copy of that version by e-mail or it would be better if you create an option for downloading it from your page for every one. We appreciate your cause and thank you very much for your cooperation. Van Khiem Nguyen
80	Date: 2000-07-18 19:26:09 DOAN NHAN ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Xin gop y kie^'n cho vi"BAC KY" Theo to^i nghi~, ba('c ky`, trung ky` hay nam ky`. chuye^.n nay kho^ng co' gi` pha?i pha^n bie^.t ca?. vi` chu'ng ta nga`y ho^m nay de^`u la nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i vie^.t ty. nan co^.ng sa~n. Hie^n dang so^'ng tha phu+o+ng noi da^'t kha'ch que^ ngu+o+`i... die^`u quan tro.ng ma` con ngu+o+`i kha'c vo+'i xu'c va^.t la` con ngu+o+`i bie^'t suy nghi~ va` nha^.n thu+'c du+o+.c da^u la` le~ pha?i, dau la` sai la^`m, da^u la chi'nh nghi~a ma` mi`nh ca^`n pha?i tra^n tro.ng ma` ba?o ve^.
79	Date: 2000-07-14 01:01:53 nguyen hien tai ( crazykenny911@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: i think you got a very good site here. I've been looking for these kind of sites for a very long time.I think you should have our national anthem available for download because i would like to have it in my computer.Just for the record my father was an airborne major for the south vietnamese, he's from vobi dalat K20.
78	Date: 2000-06-25 05:01:46 nguoi luu vong ( nguoi_luu_vong@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Ca'm o+n mo^.t nha('c nho+?, mo^.t ky? nie^.m, mo^.t go+.i nho+' ma` du+o+`ng nhu+ ddo+`i so^'ng dda~ la`m con ngu+o+`i que^n ddi. To^i tha^.t su+. sao xuye^'n khi ddu+o+.c nhi`n tha^'y , nghe tha^'y la' co+` va` ba`i quo^'c ca. To^i kho^ng da'm no'i dde^'n nhu+~ng y' nghi~a thie^ng lie^ng , hay la.m ba`n ve^` la' co+` va` quo^'c ca. Chi? xin no'i ve^` ky? va^.t. To^i va^~n ha(`ng tra^n tro.ng va` na^ng niu. DDo+`i so^'ng co' qu'a khu+', hie^.n ta.i, tu+o+ng lai. Qu'a khu+' co' ky? nie^.m. Ky? nie^.m co' vui buo^`n. Go+.i nho+' vu`ng ky? nie^.m co' ky? va^.t. Ne^'u co`n giu+~ gi`n ky? nie^.m thi` co`n na^ng niu ky? va^.t. Ky? va^.t ddo^i khi ta^`m thu+o+`ng nhu+ng ky? nie^.m dda~ la`m ky? va^.t tha`nh vo^ gi'a. Trong ti`nh ye^u, ky? va^.t ddo^i khi la` mo^.t ca`nh hoa kho^, mo^.t chie^'c nha^~n, mo^.t chie^'c a'o cu~. Ti`nh ye^u co' khi vui, co' khi buo^`n nhu+ng ky? va^.t va^~n ddu+o+.c na^ng niu. Ky? va^.t ddo^i khi cu?a cha dde^? la.i cho con, cu?a vo+. dde^? cho cho^`ng, cu?a cho^`ng da`nh cho vo+. hay cu?a ngu+o+`i ye^u da`nh cho ngu+o+`i ye^u, ngu+o+`i ba.n da`nh cho ngu+o+`i ba.n. Tra'i tim to^i co`n ta^'t ca? nhu+~ng ti`nh ye^u a^'y, to^i va^~n co`n ky? nie^.m, va^~n co`n na^ng niu ky? va^.t. La' co+`, ba`i quo^'c ca, chi? la` nhu+~ng ta^`m thu+o+`ng nhu+ nhu+~ng la' co+` ba(`ng va?i kha'c, hay nhu+~ng ba`i ha't kha'c . Nhu+ng ddo^'i vo+'i to^i, dda` tro+? tha`nh ky? va^.t ddu+o+.c trao ta(.ng tu+` cha, anh, nhu+~ng hy sinh , nhu+~ tha^n xa'c kho^ng co`n no+i ru+`ng tha(?m, nhu+~ng phe^' nha^n lang thang kha('p no+i. Nhu+~ng co^ phu. ma^'t ma't ngu+o+`i tha^n ye^u, nhu+~ng tre? mo^` co^i ma^'t cha, nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i me. ma^'t con. Nhu+~ng hy sinh ddo' chi? dde^? la.i cho mo^.t u+o+'c vo.ng dang do+? "tu+. do cho con ngu+o+`i" va` nhu+~ng ky? va^.t na`y dda~ co' mo^.t linh ho^`n . To^i xin ma~i gi`n giu+~ ky? va^.t na`y.
77	Date: 2000-06-22 10:11:18 le tien lap ( lap-le@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: I have broken in tears of what I hear and see that I missed out for a long long time. Thank for that
76	Date: 2000-06-07 06:54:04 noname ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Thank cu`, hehehehee BK
75	Date: 2000-06-01 14:51:39 Quoc Thai ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Xin co' ca^u ho?i vo+'i o^ng tu+. nha^.n la` ngu+o+`i BK o+? so^' 73. Va`o na(m 1954 o^ng co' di cu+ va`o Nam VN dde^? tra'nh na.n CS VN kho^ng ? Ne^'u co', thi` tu+` 1954-1975 o^ng cha`o quo^'c ky` VN ba(`ng la' co+` na`o ? Ne^'u o^ng kho^ng cha`o la' co+` VNCH cu?a South Vietnam, thi` o^ng thuo^.c loa.i VC na(`m vu`ng. Co`n ne^'u kho^ng di cu+ va`o nam, o^ng o+? la.i vo+'i CS BV lu'c ddo' thi` o^ng pha?i cha`o co+` CS BV cho dde^'n ba^y gio+`,nhu+ the^' ca^u ho?i cu?a o^ng chi? la` co` mo^`i cu?a CSVN tre^n die^~n dda`n na^`y, kho^ng ca^`n thie^'t dde^? chu'ng to^i ddo^'i thoa.i la`m gi`. Quo^'c ky` VNCH (tu+'c South Vietnam) muo^n na(m va` cu+o+ng quye^'t du+.ng la.i la' co+` na^`y tu+` nam chi' ba('c dde^? mang la.i Tu+. Do Da^n Chu? va` Nha^n Quye^`n cho toa`n la~nh tho^? VN.
74	Date: 2000-05-24 21:52:17 ky ( no email / no homepage) wrote: ca'i do' thi` tu`y theo y' tuo?ng cu?a ba.n.... Neu ba.n ddi theo y' nghi~a cho^'ng la.i che^' ddo^. ddo^.c ta`i co^.ng sa?n thi co` cu?a South Vietnam la` bie^?u tuo.ng cu?a nuoc tu. do Vietnam. Nguoi o mien na`o khong co' quan trong, an thua ca'i tu* tuong cua nguoi do' thoi.... VC va VNCH cu~ng co' nguoi o*? ddu? mien: Bac, Trung, Nam.....
73	Date: 2000-05-21 03:06:47 No Name ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Xin ho?i tui la` Ba('c Ki`, tui co' pha?i ba?o ve^. la' co*` cu?a South Vietnamese hay kho^ng dza^.y :o)
72	Date: 2000-05-19 19:12:04 JamesVo ( JamesV9@aol.com / no homepage) wrote: we have to protect the South Vietnamese Flag
71	Date: 2000-05-15 21:10:04 Tony Le ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Well, I didn't mean to use those profanity words, but if it wasn't for them starting a flame war then I didn't have to, ya know. UBBVQKVNCH, I forgot to tell you what a great work you guys did. As long as people know their place, then I'll return to my own place, too.
70	Date: 2000-05-15 02:05:37 *Su? Ho.c** ( no email / http://www.congsanquen.com) wrote: Hey Tony Le, dung co loi dung cho nay ma` vo day chui the nay no, ca'i do vo giao duc nhu may ong tui nay biet tong roi, ve` VN ma chui lon voi tui VC kia`, OKKKK
69	Date: 2000-05-14 22:23:11 Tony Le ( no email / no homepage) wrote: THAT STATEMENT BELOW IS NOT ME!~! WHO THE FUCK TAKES MY NAME?!!!!!! CAN YOU THINK UP YOUR OWN NAME, DUMB ASSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!
68	Date: 2000-05-14 21:54:25 Tony Le ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Chac la khong co' vua Tay hay vua Tau "na`o cua nuoc ngoai ta'n thuong nhung chien cong hien hach cua Hung Dao Vuong luc danh bai quan Mong Co hay la vua Quang Trung luc dda'nh giac Thanh va thuc dan Phap" dau, nhung chac cung khong co'vua Tay hay vua Tau nao bi. danh thua ta toi ma con dam xung ho "Quan doi ta la anh dung" dau, A` co' chu, vua VNCH do':o))
67	Date: 2000-05-14 20:08:33 *Su? Ho.c** ( no email / http://www.congsanquen.com) wrote: Hey cai thang "just a name" kia, ong noi nghe thi hay lam, nhung sao lai giong may thang ngu qua troi... Khong phai cai gi cung phai di theo sach vo, sach vo noi cai gi thi tin me. cai do'. Neu nhu o^ng noi la khong co' sach nao noi VNCH anh dung thi chang qua o^ng phi? ban luon ca dan toc VN. To tien, ong cha ta dda dau tranh chong lai ddo^ ho^. Ta`u, Ta^y suot hon mot ngan nam su?....Thu ho?i co' tha(`ng vua Ta`u na`o, thang Ta^y na`o khen nhu~ng vi. anh hu`ng cua dan toc VN la anh hung khong? Co thang Tay na`o cho rang nuoc Vietnam that la anh dung hay khong? Co' su*? na`o cua nuoc ngoai ta'n thuong nhung chien cong hien hach cua Hung Dao Vuong luc danh bai quan Mong Co hay la vua Quang Trung luc dda'nh giac Thanh va thuc dan Phap hay khong? Cho nen khong co' ai no'i trong sach vo, cung khong co' nghia la su that khong co'....Neu nhu khong co ai noi VNCH la anh dung thi chi co' may tha(`ng bu` ddo^'p cong san nhu o^ng thoi...Chac neu sach vo phi? ba'n dan toc Vietnam la nhung nguoi yeu duoi thi chac ong cung tin theo......
66	Date: 2000-05-14 18:51:33 Tony Le ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Are you just another frickin' person who has no pride for your fellowmen, huh freak? If so, you're not worthy to be called Vietnamese!!!! Call yourself <............>
65	Date: 2000-05-14 14:56:14 just a name ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Thoi di may cha oi, may cha luon mom la" VNCH anh dung", Di ma' hoi khap the gioi di, (Dung hoi chinh may cha !!!) thu coi co' ai biet VNCH cua may cha hay khong, co ai cong nhan hay khong, coi het sach trong thu vien di, coi co sach nao noi VNCH anh dung hay khong, neu co' thi xin ghi ra day cho ba con tham khao, chu o do' ma noi hoai, ai ma tin, chan lam!!!!
64	Date: 2000-05-14 09:52:50 Tony Le ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Jame Smith Tran....What the fuck are you talking about, fu? If you love your fucking Hochiminh and your damned Communist Vietnam so much, then why the fuck are you living in the US? GO BACK TO VIETNAM AND EAT SHIT!!!! If Hochiminh was a great man like you said, then why the fuck did you run for? Stay there and celebrate with your damn loving country...OH YEAH....before calling anyone as stupid as dog, you should look at yourself first....If you are damned imbecile, then you don't have the permission to judge anyone else....
63	Date: 2000-05-14 09:33:44 kim cuong ( no email / no homepage) wrote: No'i nhu* va^.y tha^.t la` ddu'ng. Kho^ng co' VNCH chie^'n dda^'u anh du~ng thi` la`m sao gio` na`y ma`y co' ma(.t o? dda^y. Ne^'u nhu* kho^ng pha?i nhu~ng nguo`i dda~ na(`m xuo^'ng o? tra^.n dda'nh Xua^n Lo^.c dde^? cha(.n dduo`ng tie^'n cu?a co^.ng sa?n Ba('c Vie^.t thi` la^'y dda^u tho`i gian cho ma`y bo? cha.y ha?.....Truo'c khi no'i ra ddie^`u gi` thi` cu~ng pha?i ne^n coi la.i chu'. Ddu'ng la` kho^ng bie^'t xa^'u ho^?
62	Date: 2000-05-14 07:47:27 NoName ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Hayyyy qua''''' vo^~~~ tayyyyyy, "Kho^ng co' VNCH, ma^`y qua My? dduuoo.c sao ?" which mean nho` VNCH dda'nh gia(.c hay qua', cho ne^n bi. Co^.ng Sa?n duo^?i qua to'i xu' co` Hue^ na^`y......Thank you VNCH, co' VNCH dda'nh gia(.c gio?i hon nu~a thi` tu.i tao le^n... thie^n dduo`ng
61	Date: 2000-05-09 21:36:39 Le^ Kha? Phie^u. ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Goo?i Jame Smith Tran thie^'n "buo^`i" co^.ng sa?n ba('c ky`. DDi.ch me. Ho^` Chi' Minh. Ve^` Vie^.t Nam m� aan cuu'c co^.ng sa?n. Coo? ma^`y tu.i co^.ng sa?n cu?ng coi khinh. DDo^` aan chao' dda' ba't. Kho^ng co' VNCH, ma^`y qua My? dduuoo.c sao ?
60	Date: 2000-05-09 20:47:49 ho chi mihn ( vgarg@hotmail.com / http://urbanwearz.com) wrote: I think you webpage could look a lot better.. i couldn't read that shit at the top.. Please make it viewable in English.. Since i know there are no computers in Vietnam that means that you didn't make the webpage there.. so write it in english for me thanks.. Later.. Vikas Garg :)
59	Date: 2000-05-04 20:47:28 Jame Smith Tran ( buoito2000@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: E Tuan, to: minhtuan_vo@hotmail.com May ngu nhu mot con cho. U are as stupid as a dog. Vietnam Cong Hoa was finished longtime ago. What's the point to ask for a anthem??? I FUCK YOU and Your Mother altoghether
58	Date: 2000-05-04 20:43:14 Jame Smith Tran ( buoito2000@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Hi, What the fuck are you doing there. Stop it. No matter what COmmunist or Viet Nam Cong Hoa, it is Vietnam. It is your country. What have U contributed to develop your country??? YOU all, RATS. Fuck you!!!! I ran way in 1975. But I love Vietnam, no matter what communist your VN Cong Hoa. I trust Ho Chi Minh, He's great man who united our country. I fuck the mothers of any people who are against Ho Chi Minh or Vietnam. Jame Smith Tran
57	Date: 2000-05-04 20:34:06 Jame Smith Tran ( buoito2000@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: I think it is a stupid idea to protect something that was damned. Stop it. Not matter what it is, whether Vietnam Communist or Vietnam Cong Hoa, it is your country. OK.
56	Date: 2000-05-01 04:55:59 gene ( geno@gtec.com / no homepage) wrote: I found this site while researching Tuy Hoa Air Force Base,which was in South Veit Nam. I was stationed there in 1969-1970. I display your flag every Memorial Day and on the 4th of July in my front yard.
55	Date: 2000-04-23 20:22:45 Calvin Mai ( AndyMai82@Aol.com / http://nohomepage.com) wrote: Fuck you, Jan Vahlenkamp You know what the hell are you
54	Date: 2000-04-05 16:58:01 anonymous coward ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Wow, stupid Jan Vahlenkamp you forgot to put Hitler, Pol Pot and yourself next to Ho chi minh...
53	Date: 2000-04-03 20:16:05 Jan Vahlenkamp ( vahlenkamp@angelfire.com / http://www.vahlenkamp.de) wrote: Ho Chi Minh forever!
52	Date: 2000-03-30 17:42:35 Calvin Mai ( AndyMai82@Aol.com / no homepage) wrote: thanks for the site
51	Date: 2000-03-29 07:57:13 quangphucquehuong ( no email / no homepage) wrote: may chu may co gioi thiet co' 1 la co dep qua choi dep ban quoc ky cung nghe hay thiet nghen la co ma bon viet cong thay la chay xanh mat hehehe
50	Date: 2000-03-19 04:32:38 chinh nghia vnch ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Yes, man chung ta thie^t la` ha`o hu`ng, qua^n ddo^.i cu?a chu'ng ta dda'nh dda^u tha('ng ddo', co^ng sa?n dda'nh dda^u thua ddo' Muo^n na(mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
49	Date: 2000-03-14 12:49:24 our flag ( no email / no homepage) wrote: great work ! I really love what you have done. Thankyou, I really appreciate your spirit.
48	Date: 2000-03-11 01:20:21 SINLE ( SINLACLE@YAHOO.COM / no homepage) wrote: HOAN TOAN UNG HO CAC BAN TRONG CONG CUOC BAO VE LA CO CHINH NGHIA VIET NAM CONG HOA
47	Date: 2000-03-08 16:49:08 HHC ( lndtf@yahoo.com / http://victorian.fortunecity.com/abbey/88/) wrote: Kho^ng ngo+` va`o dda^y la.i ti`m ddu+o+.c Midi Quo^'c Ca VN . Tha`nh tha^.t ca'm o+n !
46	Date: 2000-03-01 22:34:42 chongcong ( chongcong@haingoai.com / http://nohomepage.net) wrote: Cam on qui' vi da~ bao ve^ la' quoc ki cua chung ta 1 cach hu hieu. VNCH muon nam Da dao cong san tong thong NGUYEN VAN THIEU cua chung ta da tung noi DUNG NGHE NHUNG GI CONG SAN NOI MA HAY NHIN KI NHUNG GI CONG SAN LAM Hay sat canh cung tong thong cua chung ta de co 1 ngay nao do chung ta co the tro ve quang phuc que huong
45	Date: 2000-03-01 00:17:25 satcong ( comtam@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Your website bao-ve quoc-ky VNCH rat hay. Can bo-tuc nhieu mau sac, nhieu hinh-anh chong cong ( 1 tam hinh bang van loi noi); can link toi nhieu website to chuc chong cong khac ; e-mail " chui" may website congsan dung email gia. thank you. Hen ngay mai tro ve VietNAM voi co vang ba soc do. Chung ta can nhieu web site hon de moi sac dan khac biet che do doc tai sac mau cua cong san. Chung ta co the thua cuoc-chien 1975 nhung chung ta se thang chien tranh. " We lose the battle(1975) but we'll win the war" Mot lan nua cam on , hen thu sau. Note: sorry phai dung nickname "satcong" de tren duong tranh-dau ve nhieu mat: Tinh-bao,tam-ly chien...
44	Date: 2000-02-24 10:12:35 Do Quang Khanh ( do_q_khanh@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: That tinh co, hom nay moi vao duoc trang nay. Cam ta
43	Date: 2000-02-23 05:49:17 HoangYen ( TinanCS@yahoo.com / http://geocities.com/gigawop/Coolio.html) wrote: Di me no', c'ai tha`ng cho' na`o so^' 37 & 38 theo duo^i co^ng sa?n bu' lo^`n co^.ng sa?n
42	Date: 2000-02-22 04:56:05 Nguyen Xuan Oa'nh ( vchunter@vnn.vn.net / no homepage) wrote: Mo.i nguoi dde^`u bi^'t la` o? dda^u la' Quoc Ky VNCH cu~ng bi. bo.n Co^.ng sa?n pha' pha'ch ba(`ng nhu~ng phuong ca'ch he`n ha., tu.c ti~u va` dde^ tie^.n nha^'t, ddie^`u na`y ca`ng la`m no^?i ba^.t le^n ca'i cha'nh nghi~a, ca'i cha'nh dda.o cu?a ly' tuo+?ng Tu+. Do ma` la' co+` VNCH la`m tie^u bie^?u ddo^`ng tho+`i cu~ng la`m ro~ le^n ca'i ta'c phong Truo+.ng Phu Qua^n Tu+? va` anh hu`ng cu?a nguoi li'nh VNCH.
41	Date: 2000-02-21 16:21:34 HoangYen ( TinanCS@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Nha('n nhu? vo+'i so^' 37&30 : Hai ngu+o+`i chi? la` mo^.t te^n ma` tho^i. Ho. dda~ lo^. ba?n cha^'t va` bo^. ma(.t tha^.t cu?a con ngu+o+`i vo^ va(n ho'a, gia'o du.c qua ca'c lo+`i va(n dda~ vie^'t ra. Chu'ng ta kho^ng ne^n dde^? y' de^'n nhu+~ng ke? ngu do^'t ho+n co.ng sa?n na^`y.
40	Date: 2000-02-20 05:12:32 Jimmy Tong ( vccatcher@home.com / no homepage) wrote: To 37&38 (the same guy): Your e-mail name is your soul, no better than that! Go back to Cu Chi tunnels Mr. Rat
39	Date: 2000-02-20 04:43:48 Nguyen thi Lan ( ngthilan_01@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Ca'c em nho? tuo^?i nho+' ra(`ng forum gio^'ng nhu+ mo^.t xa~ ho^.i nho?, ta^.p trung ddu? ha.ng nguo+`i: tri' thu+'c, vo^ ho.c, li.ch su+. va` tho^ bi? vv..ne^'u ca'c em "xui" ddo.c tha^'y ma^'y ca'i tho^ tu.c, xa^'u xa cu?a "gio^'ng ngu+o+`i" na`o ddo' trong forum na`y thi` ca'c em cu~ng ddu+`ng buo^`n la` ta.i sao o+? dda^y va^~n co`n nhu+~ng nguo+`i VN ha. ca^'p nhu+ va^.y.
38	Date: 2000-02-16 22:10:35 Ho?i lam Chi? ( nhuconcat@mail.com / http://culon.com/index.html) wrote: Tao ca(m thu` co^.ng sa?n ba^y nhie^u thi` tao cu~ng coi thuo`ng ca'i tu.i VNCH tu.i ba^y ba^'y nhie^u, chi? o? kho^ng ro^`i mua' vo~ mo^`m, co' tha(`ng na`o ngon thi` ve^` VN cha`o co` cu? tu.i ba^y ddi, ddu`ng co' o? dda^y ma` bi.p bo.m ba` con co^ ba'c nu~a, bie^'t bao nhie^u tie^`n cu?a cu?a ba` con be^n VN bi. bo.n vie^t co^ng cuo'p cu?a thi` co' bao nhie^u tie^`n cu?a cu?a ba` con ha?i ngoa.i bi. tu.i ba^y ri?a ru't. T.i ba^y co' hay ho gi` ho*n co^.ng sa?n dda^u ma` khoe khoang
37	Date: 2000-02-16 22:04:31 Fuck U ( fuckU@concat.com / http://FuckU.Concattao.com) wrote: Fuck U, ngo^`i kho^ng kho^ng co' chuye^.n gi` la`m ha?, cha`o co` ca'i con ca(.t tao ne`, La' co` gi` dda'nh dda^u thua ddo', ba'o ha.i ma^'y trie^.u nguo`i nhu* tu.i tao pha?i cha.y theo qua be^n dda^y, Co^.ng sa?n nhu* con ca(.t thi` tu.i ba^y cu~ng nhu* ca'i lo^`n que` chu*' co' con me. gi` ma` khoe khoang khoa'c la'c
36	Date: 2000-01-28 23:34:06 Marc Luong van My ( swissguy_2000@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: I'm from Switzerland, I was born in 1982, seven years after the fall of Saigon. My father is from Vietnam and I lived in Saigon from 1995 to 1999. It's the first time in my life I could hear the South-Vietnamese anthem, it was a great emotion. Thank you for bringing it to the net! Marc Luong-van-My
35	Date: 2000-01-24 03:29:44 keola ( gigawop@yahoo.com / http://geocities.com/gigawop/Coolio.html) wrote: lovely page you got here. perchance the sheet music or notes to the national anthem could be added? i would love to be able to play it on the piano. also, i could not play the anthem with lyrics for some odd reason (probably my computer). again, wonderful page! i enjoyed!
34	Date: 2000-01-01 09:29:36 Free Vietnam ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Happy New Millennium to everyone. There will be no communist in the 21st century.
33	Date: 1999-12-28 00:53:00 Alex ( traitimkny@hotmail.com / http://frozenheart.webhostme.com) wrote: Truoc' tien chau' xin co' loi` chao` dde^n' cac' bac' lam` ra cai' homepage nay`. Chau' ddang kie^m' cai' midi file cua? bai` quoc ca viet nam. Xin hoi? cai' bac' co' the^? chi? cho chau' cho nao` dde^? download hay cac' bac' co' the^? sent cai' file ddo' cho chau' hay khong? xin cam' on cac' bac' rat nhieu.
32	Date: 1999-12-26 06:40:31 Dave Murray ( xdave43@injersey.com / http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Barracks/5434/ ) wrote: The struggle will continue until Vietnam is free God bless J.David Murray Chairman - POW/MIA Committee New Jersey State Council Vietnam Veterans of America
31	Date: 1999-12-20 15:47:56 NguyenKha ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Day la lan dau tien NK vao chon nay. NK rat cam dong, va cam on co/chu da lam ra webpage nay. Tu nho lon len duoi la co cua Cong San, chua mot lan duoc chao duoi co cua VNCong Hoa, nhung sao nhin thay no, chau cam thay than thuong va luyen tiec. Cam on nhieu, co chu nhe.
30	Date: 1999-12-02 01:03:57 Nguyen Viet ( no email / no homepage) wrote: This is definitely the flag historically and eventually representing the patriotic Vietnamese. North Vietnam government claimed it to be the yellow star on the red background. Our people in North Vietnam accepted it just because they believed that was for their freedom and independence. Russian and other peoples in communist countries thought the same way. Bottom line is the flag means the direction, the will of the nation. And history has strongly proved that the Yellow Flag with Three Red Stripes is the will of the nation. If you have different opinion, please voice and support your belief, should you be nationalist, communist or somethingelse. To whom that created this webpage, my personal congratulations. What you have done is great, but you have to do much more, more not only to remember but also more to convince. Give people a chance to debate and find out the truth that some of us were blocked.
29	Date: 1999-11-28 15:15:36 le su bay ( johnsu2000@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: good job
28	Date: 1999-11-23 14:57:25 Truong Nguyen ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Minh Tuan Duong Vo co the download quoc ca viet nam tai http://www.rfvn.com hoac http://come.to/ngayvietnam
27	Date: 1999-11-23 05:25:14 Johnny Hoang ( johnnyhoang@vietline.net / http://www.vietline.net) wrote: Chau xin chao` ca'c chu'/co^ Wensite rat la hay, chau cam on ba`i ha't...dda~ mang la.i ho^`i nho*' la.i cho chau'...VNCH forever..
26	Date: 1999-11-19 12:21:11 Minhtuan Duong Vo ( minhtuan_vo@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Ma^'y co^ chu' co' ba`i quoc ca VNCH na`o ma` co' lo`i ca thi` lam on cho cha'u xin hoac chi cho^? chau download. Ca'm o*n nhie^`u. Minhtuan Vo
25	Date: 1999-11-18 20:27:18 Al Cain ( bac-si@excite.com / no homepage) wrote: This is a very interesting site. I was not aware that there existed and organization to bring democracy and the S. Vietnamese Flag to Viet Nam. I serve with the 3rd Marine Division in Viet Nam in 1966..Khe Sahn, Cam Lo, Con Thien, etc. It's nice to know that my and thousands of other US servicemen's efforts are not in vain.
24	Date: 1999-11-17 03:44:41 Vietnam in my heart ( no email / no homepage) wrote: I have a few thought in regard to comment no 8 and the like. The question should not be who will be the leader. My god, do you think someone from the sky will be leading us. No. The issue must be HOW the people will be leading themselves. And who ever are chosen to be leading, that person must be seen as the CHILD of the nation, NOT THE FARTHER, REMEMBER?, NO ONE CAN BE THE FATHER OF THE NATION. The people should fight to have the right to choose there own leader. The fact that someone was leading through the war should not guarantee that they will be the leader forever!? No 8 also say that too many people already die and there should be no more to die! Of course there was already too many people die but now there are just more people who, can not be considered to be living. They exist but don't live. Their lives are not a human life anymore. Has anyone been to the contry side, just a few km away from any "city" and see how the people are "living"? ask them what their parents, grand parents fight for. Did they fight and die for something like what it is now? THINK ABOUT IT.
23	Date: 1999-11-16 01:27:26 Lan nguyen ( gnolan52@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: Rat boi hoi khi nghe bai QUOC CA cua chung ta, xin cam on cac chien huu.
22	Date: 1999-11-14 08:00:05 Phucnguyen ( vietnam_chet_doi@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Fucking viet nam Viet nam cong hoa muon nam muon nam !! Memberdeath@HTK
21	Date: 1999-11-08 15:17:20 UBBV/QK/VNCH ( UBBV_QKVNCH@hotmail.com / http://ChaoCoVNCH.homepage.com) wrote: This is in reponse to comments on #18 and 19. For Mr. Smith : We don't keep VC archival information, but you may contact Vietnam Embassy in Washington DC for direction (we already provided you their Website). For Mr. Wession Jr. : We appreciate for your very nice comment and hope you continue to support us for an early regaining Democracy and Freedom in Vietnam. Thank you all for visiting our "Salute RVN Flag Website". CPF/RVN(UBBV/QK/VNCH)
20	Date: 1999-11-07 21:32:28 Lu+u La.c ( central@planet.com / no homepage) wrote: Nu+o+'c Ma^'t, Nha` Tan, Vo+. Bo?, Con Di Hoan Nga`y ho^m nay Chu'ng Ta co`n la.i gi`sau ga^`n 25 na(m tro+`i xa xu+' ? CS Da~ ha`nh xu+~ O^ng Ba` Cha Me. To^? Tie^n cu~a chu'ng ta nhu+ the^ na`o Trong Tho+`i gian vu+`a qua ? Nu+o+'c VN co' pha?i la`mo^.t nha` tu` Kho^ng sao ma` to^i kho^ng tha^'y " Tu+. Do, Da^n Chu? va` Nha^n Quye^`n " Da^u he^'t va^.y ? Da^n VN nga`y Nay co' pha+?i ddang la`nhu+~ng te^n "No le^. Ha.nh Phu'c" Tre^n chi'nh mie^`n da^'t me. cu~c mi`nh pha?i kho^ng va^.y ? Ba.n O+i, Co`n la.i Chi ! ! ! chi? Mo^.t la' quo^'c ky` cu`ng ho^`n thie^n so^ng nu'i. Chu'ng Ta, Nhu+~ng ngu+o+`i con da^n Vie^.t Tha Phu+o+ng, Ha~y cu`ng nhau Giu+~ Vu+~ng ngo.n co+`. Do+.i mo^.t nga`y Cu`ng nhau ve^` Co^' Quo^'c.
19	Date: 1999-11-07 20:37:43 EDWARD J. WESSON JR. ( edwardJWfromAR@webtv.net / no homepage) wrote: I WANT TO THANK GOD ALMIGHTY FOR SPEAKING TO YOU BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE. I HAD ALWAYS ADMIRED YOUR ANCIENT CULTURE FOR ALL TIME NOW. IT'S BEEN NICE FOR YOU HAVING ME ON YOUR WEB SITE. GOOD DAY.
18	Date: 1999-11-05 15:06:50 LEW SMITH ( iaccair@bellsouth.net / no homepage) wrote: I'm seeking archival information on the operations of the 501st VC Battalion during 1966. Can you direct me to an internet site which has such information? Thanks.
17	Date: 1999-10-31 18:32:35 to Mr. stopby ( no email / no homepage) wrote: how many communist country still exists in this world? I think less than the fingers in one of my hands.
16	Date: 1999-10-31 17:43:57 Nguyen Thanh Tung ( no email / no homepage) wrote: I totally agree with number #15. Thanks. Tung
15	Date: 1999-10-31 05:29:26 a stop by ( no email / no homepage) wrote: It looks like all the communists are the same: No education. Need to be courteous and use more serious words , don't act like an uneducated person (#8,9,11,12) even if your ideology is different. Remember one more thing: communist is totally obsolete, how many communist country still exists in this world? Sooner or later the communist will be vanished in this planet. Don't defend your regime. Awake young men.
14	Date: 1999-10-30 20:16:22 Hung Son ( no email / no homepage) wrote: T�i l� ngܩi Vi�t s�ng t�i Th�y S�, r�t vui m�ng �ܮc nghe b�n Qu�c Ca Vi�t Nam tr�n Internet. T�i xin ph�p �ܮc thu l�i tr�n m�y �i�n to�n ǋ ph� bi�n ǉn c�c b�n t�i t�i Th�y S�. H�ng-S�n
13	Date: 1999-10-30 13:57:50 Quoc Bao ( TiNanCS@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote: We are highly respecting your efforts in keeping of the Flag of the Republic of Vietnam alive to serve on the Democracy and Freedom for Vietnam. The current communist regime must go by the wishes of more than 70 millions of the Vietnamese people. By the way, I feel so sorry for the people who have written their comments from numbers 9,11 and 12 below. I don't know who you are but you seem to confuse and do harm yourself. Be courteous and better language even if we disagree one another. Please act like a nationalist not a communist. Thanks.
12	Date: 1999-10-29 17:51:19 NO ( no email / no homepage) wrote: I think you should use your time to do something that may benefit for other people. Please do not depend on the welffair, and do something like jerk. A person who makes minimum wage is more valuable than your whole group.
11	Date: 1999-10-28 21:54:34 Damn ( no email / no homepage) wrote: An com Cong San ma` tho may cha Quoc Gia
10	Date: 1999-10-26 19:06:06 Viet Quoc Home Page ( webmaster@vietquoc.com / http://www.vietquoc.com) wrote: Dear friends, Your efforts sre highly appreciated. You should have additional articles about the history of the RVN national anthem and flag. Visit our wewbsite. Best wishes. Mot co gang rat dang ca ngoi. Tiep tuc, dung thay cuong quyen manh ma so. Moi xem VQ Home Page. VQHP
9	Date: 1999-10-26 08:13:08 yu ( tttp@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Mot lu ngu ngoc
8	Date: 1999-10-25 21:24:56 GiaDinh ( hung_vuong16@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Tell me what can you change?...,, how? Do you guarantee that it people will leave happier than now?..,It is good that war is ended? Dont you think that there are enough people die, losing their familly?, and who will be a new leader if suppose viet communist is down?.. those people who fought for the war? The question is, Can they do it? Will they be a better leader?, will be any fight of who will be a leader?, please answer me these questions.
7	Date: 1999-10-21 07:18:41 VIETNAM ( no email / no homepage) wrote: NO COMMENT!WHAT WILL BE, WILL BE! BELIEVE IT!
6	Date: 1999-10-19 20:14:28 Tri Dung ( coolsurfer@gmx.net / http://come.to/beany) wrote: Just visited, no comments! Politic is not my thing!
5	Date: 1999-10-14 16:14:40 none ( no email / no homepage) wrote: My father would not allow me to have Email address publish on this page (I don't know why) but I have to respect him. This is the first time I realize the Republic of Vietnam Flag must be remained in the Vietnamese communities. I never see this flag when left Vietnam for United States. At school, my teacher told me that this is not a Vietnam flag but the other one with red and yellow star officially. My parents repeatedly advise me that we have to respect the flag of Republic of Vietnam only. Thanks to your Web site, I now understand my father's stand and love him more. Thanks for your help. Kim Lesly Tran.
4	Date: 1999-10-10 16:22:40 Nguyen Phuc Quang ( PQNguyen@hotmail.com / no homepage) wrote: Toi la mot nguoi Viet ti nan o Hoa ky, sau nhieu nam bi di tu trong tai cai tao Cong san Viet Nam. Anh em HO chung toi rat cam phuc co gang cua cac Ong da dem la Quoc Ky VNCH tren dien dan man luoi Internet de vinh danh chinh nghia quoc gia. Kinh chuc Uy Ban Bao Ve Quoc Ky VNCH giu vung niem tin ngay ve dung lai co vang ba soc do o que huong yeu dau Viet Nam.
3	Date: 1999-10-10 04:11:22 HongQuoc ( no email / no homepage) wrote: Dear Vietnam Cong Hoa; my country First, my real identity will be kept a secret. I am a vietnamese living abroad. I was not there during the time of the struggle for the freedom in Vietnam (1945-1975), but my parents, much respect, has taught me how important it IS that I should remember and protect the South Vietnamese Flag (SVF). Many brave and committed soldiers of the days have fought and have died for her. They have given us their lives for the freedom of millions--but unfortunately fortune did not grant them this sacrifice. One thing, they have passed on this value to the children living abroad. I am one of them. I have been resurrected from the brave soldiers. Hear me, I will return and save her.
2	Date: 1999-10-07 17:35:32 Jesse Terrico ( TErricoj@wss.sd73.bc.ca / no homepage) wrote: This site is not fast enough for my liking!! If I were you I would find a faster server
1	Date: 1999-10-05 20:17:27 Tran Tu ( no email / no homepage) wrote: This is a good site. We love our Flag. Thanks.